Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Reverse Supra brake conversion? Loosing the TT 4pots?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 05:34 PM
  #1  
EUROJulian's Avatar
EUROJulian
Thread Starter
Intermediate
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 400
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default Reverse Supra brake conversion? Loosing the TT 4pots?

I just noticed interesting trend on supraforum where people are trading their TT brake setups for NA ones?
What is actually happening? I wasn`t there for a while and I`m out of touch aparently. Anybody knows?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 05:38 PM
  #2  
siniquezu's Avatar
siniquezu
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 0
From: TheOC
Default

slicks
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 05:53 PM
  #3  
AutoCoutureSC's Avatar
AutoCoutureSC
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Originally posted by siniquezu
slicks
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 08:55 PM
  #4  
verylost's Avatar
verylost
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default

Who needs big brakes when you got a parachute
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 06:10 AM
  #5  
CleanSC's Avatar
CleanSC
Pole Position
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 29
From: Florida
Default

Originally posted by siniquezu
slicks
I'm assuming this is for drag racing since downgrading your brakes for auto-x or similar is not exactly smart. With that established:

Why would you need slicks on the front of your Supra?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 10:36 AM
  #6  
G Star's Avatar
G Star
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,973
Likes: 48
From: California
Default

Originally posted by CleanSC
I'm assuming this is for drag racing since downgrading your brakes for auto-x or similar is not exactly smart. With that established:

Why would you need slicks on the front of your Supra?
Only thing that comes to my mind is that, it's a trend...
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 03:29 PM
  #7  
EUROJulian's Avatar
EUROJulian
Thread Starter
Intermediate
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 400
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

Originally posted by Xotic sC
Only thing that comes to my mind is that, it's a trend...
Interesting responses... Yes trend, I care to know though what is behind it...

Anybody else?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 03:41 PM
  #8  
ACleanSC4's Avatar
ACleanSC4
Lead Lap
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,010
Likes: 8
From: California
Default

i don't think they're trading their front brakes...only the rears to fit big slicks in the back...
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 04:05 PM
  #9  
rscott's Avatar
rscott
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

They trade their fronts to safely run the skinnies up front. With the slicks its almost necessary to go with the skinnies up front for stability and to save rotating weight. Bias ply skinnies ensure the most stability.
When going with 16" rear wheels like the rx-7 stock wheels for slicks all that is needed is a little shaving of the rear caliper to get them to fit. If going with a 15" slick, they would need to go with the NA rears.
As for the fronts the minimum to clear the front brakes is 16" and the only company that makes them in the right fitment is CCW and those can get costly real quickly. Also on the note of the 16" CCW skinnies, they require a pretty hefty spacer to get them to clear since the disc is very shallow on them (they are only 4" wheels). Safety become an issuewhen running that big of a spacer. Anyway, they trade down for the NA parts so that they can run a 15" setup both front and rear. The combination gives the best mix of safety, traction at low speeds and stability top end.

Anyway it boils down to running slicks almost requires skinnies up front for stability and the safest/most cost effective way to do it would be to run smaller brakes to run the right sized skinnies. So if any of you guys are going to be drag racing, keep your brakes
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 10:12 AM
  #10  
SPORTcoupe's Avatar
SPORTcoupe
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: California
Default



Who cares.....it's cheaper TT brakes

~Alan
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 03:16 PM
  #11  
THE_CEO's Avatar
THE_CEO
Pole Position
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 51
From: Michigan
Default

Originally posted by SPORTcoupe


Who cares.....it's cheaper TT brakes

~Alan
yep!

CEO
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 04:38 PM
  #12  
rscott's Avatar
rscott
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

lol damn.
i thought people really wanted to know.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 10:27 PM
  #13  
SPORTcoupe's Avatar
SPORTcoupe
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally posted by rscott
lol damn.
i thought people really wanted to know.
I was just kidding.
That was a perfect explanation.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 08:56 AM
  #14  
mteele's Avatar
mteele
Lexus Champion
CL Folding 10,000
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,113
Likes: 3
From: North Carolina
Default

Yeah, good explanation. I was getting worried that no one else knew the answer the further down the post I read, and I didnt want to explain it out
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2004 | 07:11 AM
  #15  
BoostCrazy's Avatar
BoostCrazy
Driver
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Rscott told it pretty well....Im running NA brakes all around on my supra for that exact reason...16" bogarts all around with skinnies up front
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Richie
Car Chat
7
Sep 16, 2004 12:10 PM
JtWo
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
8
Sep 9, 2004 02:17 PM
TLW
Car Chat
18
May 14, 2004 11:54 AM
JohnGS4
Suspension and Brakes
3
Feb 28, 2004 06:09 AM
Lex Luthor
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
15
Sep 9, 2003 07:37 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:15 AM.