Notices
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015) Discussion topics related to the 2010 - 2015 RX350 and RX450H models

Brake Pad Life ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2018 | 03:13 PM
  #1  
relax221's Avatar
relax221
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default Brake Pad Life ?

41000 miles on my RX is it time for brakes?
Reply
Old May 15, 2018 | 04:57 PM
  #2  
fastnoypi's Avatar
fastnoypi
Racer
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 87
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by relax221
41000 miles on my RX is it time for brakes?

maybe ..maybe not. Have your rotors mic'd for thickness and inspect your pads..that will tell you the answer.
Reply
Old May 15, 2018 | 05:06 PM
  #3  
takeshi74's Avatar
takeshi74
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 582
Likes: 36
From: TX
Default

^ This. You can't rely on mileage. Person A at X miles could need new brakes while Person B at the same X mileage might not.

While this is the non-hybrid forum, keep in mind that there are those of use with hybrids in here so be sure to include the number. Our hybrids, for example, can go much longer between brake replacements because the regenerative brakes are used for much of the braking.
Reply
Old May 16, 2018 | 08:58 AM
  #4  
RealWing's Avatar
RealWing
Pit Crew
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 142
Likes: 51
From: Ontario
Default

I just replaced the rear rotors and pads for the first time at 50,000 Km (31,000 miles). A couple of the pads were down to minimum thickness and were very close to the steel backing plate. Front had lots of material left.
Reply
Old May 16, 2018 | 10:08 AM
  #5  
Clutchless's Avatar
Clutchless
CL Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,145
Likes: 1,710
From: VA
Default

My rear pads also worn out at about 31,000 miles. Fronts were fine. I attribute it to city driving.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2018 | 04:59 AM
  #6  
RX in NC's Avatar
RX in NC
Racer
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 599
From: NC
Default Factory Brake Pad Life ?

2015 RX350 FWD with the factory 19-inch wheels....

We purchased this vehicle four weeks ago with 32,750 miles on the odometer and the remainder of the factory warranty until mid-August 2019. It was a well-maintained corporate lease vehicle in Florida. It is now my wife's daily driver, she has put just over 500 miles on it to date, and thus far she is quite pleased with it. From August 2003 until February 2012 she had a 2000 RX300 AWD and a 2004 RX330 AWD so she has a certain familiarity with the model (although this one is more powerful and has more amenities). I know brake pad lifespan is dependent upon driving conditions and individual driving styles, but I am curious regarding how long the factory pads are lasting for you long-time owners here. What can you tell me?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2018 | 07:54 AM
  #7  
Clutchless's Avatar
Clutchless
CL Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,145
Likes: 1,710
From: VA
Default

My rear pads wore out by 35,000 miles. The fronts lasted much longer, but the front rotors rusted out within the cooling vents after 4 years. I would have your brake pad depth inspected to know how much life remains.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2018 | 09:16 AM
  #8  
RX in NC's Avatar
RX in NC
Racer
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 599
From: NC
Default

Thanks for your feedback. When I do my first tire rotation on this vehicle at 35,000 miles, I will take a good look at the brake pads on all four corners. When replacement time rolls around, I plan to go with the appropriate Wagner ThermoQuiet brake pads (probably sourced from rockauto.com). I have run them on our Jaguars and on my Ram for close to a decade and typically get at least 50,000 miles out of them regardless of the vehicle. I also had them on my wife's two previous RX models. Still a great bang-for-the-buck brake pad.

Reply
Old Nov 27, 2018 | 09:55 AM
  #9  
iolmaster's Avatar
iolmaster
Racer
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 247
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Clutchless
My rear pads wore out by 35,000 miles. The fronts lasted much longer, but the front rotors rusted out within the cooling vents after 4 years. I would have your brake pad depth inspected to know how much life remains.
I hope you just got the words backward. I have never heard of back brakes wearing out before the front.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2018 | 10:37 AM
  #10  
RX in NC's Avatar
RX in NC
Racer
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 599
From: NC
Default

Rear pads wearing out before front pads may not be common, but it can certainly be characteristic of some vehicles. It was for my now-sold 2005 Jaguar S-Type sedan. The front pads typically did 60,000 miles, but the rear pads were typically done by 45,000 miles.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2018 | 11:46 AM
  #11  
iolmaster's Avatar
iolmaster
Racer
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 247
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by RX in NC
Rear pads wearing out before front pads may not be common, but it can certainly be characteristic of some vehicles. It was for my now-sold 2005 Jaguar S-Type sedan. The front pads typically did 60,000 miles, but the rear pads were typically done by 45,000 miles.
I am 66 and have never paid for a brake job. I have been doing them since I was a kid. I have had all sorts of cars both foreign and domestic and I have never had rear brake pads not last longer than front. That includes the current 2015 RX I have now. I have 40K miles on the car and I have already replaced the front pads. The rear have lots of pad left. I am not saying it is not possible, but I am saying it is not the norm. My 2006 SC430 had the rear pads last about 80K and the fronts only last about 35K.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2018 | 11:59 AM
  #12  
MellonC00's Avatar
MellonC00
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 938
Likes: 71
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by RX in NC
Rear pads wearing out before front pads may not be common, but it can certainly be characteristic of some vehicles. It was for my now-sold 2005 Jaguar S-Type sedan. The front pads typically did 60,000 miles, but the rear pads were typically done by 45,000 miles.
dont know why but this seems to be the case with RX’s. My gen 1 RX always ran down the rear pads first.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2018 | 01:24 PM
  #13  
paperthin's Avatar
paperthin
Pit Crew
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 129
Likes: 17
From: Ontario
Default

This type of question will render all sorts of answers. My wife RX450 i change rears at 230k kms and the front at 140k kms. My cars have been similar in the past.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2018 | 01:50 PM
  #14  
iolmaster's Avatar
iolmaster
Racer
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 247
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by MellonC00


dont know why but this seems to be the case with RX’s. My gen 1 RX always ran down the rear pads first.
Wow, I don't know where this is coming from. I had a 2000 RX, my daughter currently has a 2004 RX, and I own a 2015 RX. I have never had that happen and we have owned the two older cars for years. I have always had the front pads go first. By a long shot!
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2018 | 02:10 PM
  #15  
louczar's Avatar
louczar
Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 157
Likes: 24
From: TX
Default

My last 4 brand new vehicles all had their brake pads last into the 120K+ range...that is about where I traded them in. But, I drive ~100 miles round trip every day to and from work and it is all highway miles.

I will keep an eye on my wife's 2015 RX350 brakes. I've never seen or heard of the rear going out first. Like lolmaster above...I am 50 and have been doing my own brakes since my dad taught me when I was 16. I have never seen the rear wear out before the front.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:08 PM.