Notices
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015) Discussion topics related to the 2010 - 2015 RX350 and RX450H models

WITH NAVIGATION OR WITHOUT?? rx 350 2010

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2013 | 06:45 PM
  #1  
sk52's Avatar
sk52
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: ny
Default WITH NAVIGATION OR WITHOUT?? rx 350 2010

I was intending on buying a 2010 rx 350 with a navigation system and am now having second thoughts. Any feedback on your experience? worth it or not? is it great or not?
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2013 | 10:16 PM
  #2  
markrivers's Avatar
markrivers
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 11
From: California
Default

my iphone 5 and other smart phones have better navigation than the OEM navigation that comes with the RX.
Stand alone GPS (Garmin, Tomtom) have better screen than the RX Navi ( now, they're using glass instead of the plasticky capacitive screen).
and these stand alone GPS units, even the top of the line ones are below $400.

Since it's 2010, i'm pretty sure you will need to update it unless you're getting it from a dealer and they can update the maps for you.
However, RX 350 that have navigation usually have something else ( premium, comfort packages etc) which a Non-navi RX might be missing.

and if you plan to trade or sell the RX a few years down the road, the Navigation comes handy.

So to answer your question: Worth it or not? as a Navigation. Nope. BUT as a cleaner INFOtainment system, YES.
Is it great or not. Definitely not. and map updates are costly.

Last edited by markrivers; Jun 9, 2013 at 06:53 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 02:15 AM
  #3  
DunWkg's Avatar
DunWkg
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 27
From: Iowa
Default

Drive both, one with navigation and one without, then make your decision. I maybe in a minority, but I love the navigation/audio/climate control/destination/bluetooth/telephone/built-in dashboard system with the remote touch control.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 04:40 AM
  #4  
kitlz's Avatar
kitlz
No, I don't play soccer!
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 177
From: NJ
Default

Definitely a good suggestion David because it's not just about nav. There are other functions integrated in the screen including the back up camera. Without nav, the screen is much smaller and displays limited information. Also you get an extra storage space in place of remote touch. For directions, GPS is probably better since it can be updated frequently and costs less if not free. Lexus nav updates are behind by at least a year. It's also $300 installed. But you are not obligated to do it. Getting traffic alerts is another feature of nav. When a destination is entered, a notice will pop up if there's trouble ahead. It may change your route. That runs another $25/quarter. I recently updated nav for the first time more so for the points of interest. Roads rarely change around here. Finally there's resale consideration. A nav-equipped RX is more desirable.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 08:26 AM
  #5  
azinn's Avatar
azinn
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 216
Likes: 10
From: Tampa Bay
Default

Originally Posted by sk52
I was intending on buying a 2010 rx 350 with a navigation system and am now having second thoughts. Any feedback on your experience? worth it or not? is it great or not?
I would go with a Garmin or TomTom rather the factory GPS on any make or model of any car manufacture. Much more flexible and can use in any vehicle you own or rent. Also on most new GPS units the updates are free for life. Just my 2 cents.

Last edited by azinn; Jun 10, 2013 at 08:27 AM. Reason: GPS update info added.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 08:51 AM
  #6  
dapimpee's Avatar
dapimpee
Pole Position
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 210
Likes: 1
From: va
Default

Originally Posted by sk52
I was intending on buying a 2010 rx 350 with a navigation system and am now having second thoughts. Any feedback on your experience? worth it or not? is it great or not?
To answer your question. When i first bought my rx , almost every one i know asked me this question " Does it come with a nav?" I know that there are many cheaper alternate ways to navigate out there but i believe that the car comes with a factory navigation looks much better and cleaner than the one without it ( after market nav mounts on dashboard or windshield doesn't give the car a clean look at all) However, it's your money so buy what you think it's good for you.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 05:25 PM
  #7  
Hawkeye70's Avatar
Hawkeye70
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

I have a 2010 RX350 with NAV. The primary reason I purchased this car was the bi-Xenon headlights & associated characteristics. But, they only were available with the NAV package.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 09:43 PM
  #8  
ecr72's Avatar
ecr72
Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 171
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by azinn
Quote:
I would go with a Garmin or TomTom rather the factory GPS on any make or model of any car manufacture. Much more flexible and can use in any vehicle you own or rent. Just my 2 cents.
I own a portable GPS for when I'm on th go, but both of our verhicles have built in Nav units. I prefer the cleaner look of a factory unit. The screens are bigger than you'll get on a phone or portable unit. If I need to glance at the screen to see something, I want something I can see quickly so I can get my eyes back on the road.

These questions come up all the time and to be honest, if you set out looking for a vehicle with Nav, then don't settle or you'll regret it every single time you see the ugly Garmin sitting above your dash.


Posted from ClubLexus.com App for Android
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 05:28 AM
  #9  
JPJump's Avatar
JPJump
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

I initially thought about buying the non-NAV RX but a buddy of mine who buys and sells used cars for a dealership highly recommended I consider the RX with a NAV especially if my intention is to sell it in a few years. The trade-in will be higher obviously and it's an easier sell if I opted to sell privately.

Aside from that, I really like the setup/look of the NAV so I'm glad I got it.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 06:22 AM
  #10  
robartin's Avatar
robartin
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: GA
Default

Get the Nav. The whole interior looks better with it. The maps are really convenient.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 06:29 AM
  #11  
GoGiantsNJ's Avatar
GoGiantsNJ
Pole Position
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

I also agree that the Nav is essential in a luxury Make. I actually like my Nav, I don't know how many times my portable Magellon fell off the suction cup on my dashboard mount. I won't buy a new car without Nav.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 06:55 AM
  #12  
tfischer's Avatar
tfischer
CL Community Team
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 394
From: Ohio
Default

Get the NAV. I have it in both of my cars because I liked it so much in the first one.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 11:24 AM
  #13  
dapimpee's Avatar
dapimpee
Pole Position
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 210
Likes: 1
From: va
Default

I have a factory gps and also carry a portable as a back up.

Last edited by dapimpee; Jun 10, 2013 at 01:27 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 11:34 AM
  #14  
Joeb427's Avatar
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11,670
Likes: 20
From: SC
Default

The new generation IS has a new NAV system that is said to be nicer.I don't know if the lousy directions improves but it has a 3D building screen,whole address voice input instead of city,then street,number etc.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 12:41 PM
  #15  
RXinNJ's Avatar
RXinNJ
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 3
From: NJ
Default

As a non-NAV owner, one thing I will say that is that the ipod interface is pretty bad. Just in case that's something that's important to you.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 PM.