1999 - 2003 Lexus RX300 in the snow
#1
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
1999 - 2003 Lexus RX300 in the snow
Hello. I'm new to the forum and I've always loved the Lexus RX300 & 350 models. I'm looking to purchase my first one and my main concern is how they are in the snow? As much as I want this car for the style and luxury of the vehicle, I really need something that is good in the snow to get me to work and back. It's about a 15 minute trip so it's not too bad but we live in PA and we get some pretty big storms and our driveway is up a pretty steep mountain and we don't get plows on our driveway so I'm a little worried on the snow performance. Thanks for any help you can give to a newbie.
#2
Moderator
AWD/FWD?
Quality of tires for winter is the key.
Salim
Quality of tires for winter is the key.
Salim
#3
I was about to ask a similar question, I have an RX300 AWD and understand that quality tires aer key.
SO my question is besides tires what would make a RX300 AWD, Subaru AWD, Rav4 AWD CR-V AWD, NIssan AWD better or worse than each other in the snow? Is it the programming of the transmission / differential?
SO my question is besides tires what would make a RX300 AWD, Subaru AWD, Rav4 AWD CR-V AWD, NIssan AWD better or worse than each other in the snow? Is it the programming of the transmission / differential?
#4
Moderator
Please excuse the rambling ... so read at your own discretion
The whole issue is providing torque to the wheel(s) which has traction in slippery conditions. At the same time when you are driving in dry condition how the torque is limited to the wheel that does not want to spin at the same rate as the other [turning, one wheel going over a bump]. So different manufacturers have come up with different solution. Fixed [all time] typically tune it for the dry condition.
First gen RX AWD is by no means the superior system. Some were equipped with LSD which made its better. Surprisingly FWD with traction control [used to be an option] worked better than AWD [but needed traction on one of the front two]. Keep in mind first gen is now almost 20 yrs old and back then you had two choices amongst cross over SUVs ... RX and ML (Benz). So Benz jury rigged an elaborate rollers based set-up and demonstrated the ineffective RX AWD system. In response Lexus started offering Trac in all offerings.
Moving along to current times, Subaru's AWD is considered a superior system. Open to discussion though.
At the end, I say, know your system well, so that you dont get into a situation that you cant handle. Even track based tanks have a limitation where they cant go.
Worst is when folks get into the false security and think their AWD can drive through any condition ... but physics says once traction is lost on all fours you are riding a puck.
Salim
The whole issue is providing torque to the wheel(s) which has traction in slippery conditions. At the same time when you are driving in dry condition how the torque is limited to the wheel that does not want to spin at the same rate as the other [turning, one wheel going over a bump]. So different manufacturers have come up with different solution. Fixed [all time] typically tune it for the dry condition.
First gen RX AWD is by no means the superior system. Some were equipped with LSD which made its better. Surprisingly FWD with traction control [used to be an option] worked better than AWD [but needed traction on one of the front two]. Keep in mind first gen is now almost 20 yrs old and back then you had two choices amongst cross over SUVs ... RX and ML (Benz). So Benz jury rigged an elaborate rollers based set-up and demonstrated the ineffective RX AWD system. In response Lexus started offering Trac in all offerings.
Moving along to current times, Subaru's AWD is considered a superior system. Open to discussion though.
At the end, I say, know your system well, so that you dont get into a situation that you cant handle. Even track based tanks have a limitation where they cant go.
Worst is when folks get into the false security and think their AWD can drive through any condition ... but physics says once traction is lost on all fours you are riding a puck.
Salim
#5
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Please excuse the rambling ... so read at your own discretion
The whole issue is providing torque to the wheel(s) which has traction in slippery conditions. At the same time when you are driving in dry condition how the torque is limited to the wheel that does not want to spin at the same rate as the other [turning, one wheel going over a bump]. So different manufacturers have come up with different solution. Fixed [all time] typically tune it for the dry condition.
First gen RX AWD is by no means the superior system. Some were equipped with LSD which made its better. Surprisingly FWD with traction control [used to be an option] worked better than AWD [but needed traction on one of the front two]. Keep in mind first gen is now almost 20 yrs old and back then you had two choices amongst cross over SUVs ... RX and ML (Benz). So Benz jury rigged an elaborate rollers based set-up and demonstrated the ineffective RX AWD system. In response Lexus started offering Trac in all offerings.
Moving along to current times, Subaru's AWD is considered a superior system. Open to discussion though.
At the end, I say, know your system well, so that you dont get into a situation that you cant handle. Even track based tanks have a limitation where they cant go.
Worst is when folks get into the false security and think their AWD can drive through any condition ... but physics says once traction is lost on all fours you are riding a puck.
Salim
The whole issue is providing torque to the wheel(s) which has traction in slippery conditions. At the same time when you are driving in dry condition how the torque is limited to the wheel that does not want to spin at the same rate as the other [turning, one wheel going over a bump]. So different manufacturers have come up with different solution. Fixed [all time] typically tune it for the dry condition.
First gen RX AWD is by no means the superior system. Some were equipped with LSD which made its better. Surprisingly FWD with traction control [used to be an option] worked better than AWD [but needed traction on one of the front two]. Keep in mind first gen is now almost 20 yrs old and back then you had two choices amongst cross over SUVs ... RX and ML (Benz). So Benz jury rigged an elaborate rollers based set-up and demonstrated the ineffective RX AWD system. In response Lexus started offering Trac in all offerings.
Moving along to current times, Subaru's AWD is considered a superior system. Open to discussion though.
At the end, I say, know your system well, so that you dont get into a situation that you cant handle. Even track based tanks have a limitation where they cant go.
Worst is when folks get into the false security and think their AWD can drive through any condition ... but physics says once traction is lost on all fours you are riding a puck.
Salim
Thank you for your response. I guess I need to do my homework before I jump into one of these older models. I e been learning so much. Thank you again, I truly appreciate it!
#6
Moderator
Another way to look at int would be, even if your vehicle is capable of driving through a bad patch of road, would you like to share it with other crazy drivers. Not in my lux-ute.
Salim
#7
Lexus Test Driver
For what it's worth, I have two AWD '99's with all-weather Michelin tires, and I've never had any trouble in Iowa winters getting anywhere. Never had a need for dedicated winter tires. I would recommend a first-gen RX without hesitation!!
Trending Topics
#10
Driver School Candidate
I would also recommend the first generation RX without hesitation. I have been driving mine through all seasons for the past two years and never has there been a problem, even with several inches of snow on the ground. I prefer driving it to a Subaru Forester in the snow.
I should add that I have the AWD, which I think is better for winter driving than the FWD.
I should add that I have the AWD, which I think is better for winter driving than the FWD.
Last edited by NYJim; 01-13-18 at 12:18 PM.
#11
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Thank you for your reply. The one I found is missing 2 lugnuts, can you buy them at a local Auto Parts store or do you have to get them through a dealer?
#12
Moderator
The other option would be to buy wheel locks (sold by McGaurd and you will free up 2 nuts.
Salim
#14
Plz
Make sure you look at the stud threads. A lot of times, the reason why the lugnutd are missing is because the threads galled and the nuts wouldn't go back on. If this is the case you'll need new studs pressed in(which normally means removing the wheel hub).
#15
Lexus Test Driver
My wife's '02 AWD was remarkable on half-worn OEM tires in about 4" of snow (no ice). I attempted to get it to break traction in a parking lot...full steering lock, attempting to do snownuts.
Nope.
Even tried backward, using the weight over the nose as a 'tail' to wag the dog.
The VSC was not happy with me, but it kept the car perfectly in-line. I've even had it off-road with opposite corners in the air, not a problem (besides the truly odd feeling of teetering).
Never got to do anything fun with it while it had BFG A/T kos in the OEM size, though.
Nope.
Even tried backward, using the weight over the nose as a 'tail' to wag the dog.
The VSC was not happy with me, but it kept the car perfectly in-line. I've even had it off-road with opposite corners in the air, not a problem (besides the truly odd feeling of teetering).
Never got to do anything fun with it while it had BFG A/T kos in the OEM size, though.