Notices
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003) Discussion topics related to the 1999 -2003 RX300 models

I have a bad gas mileage, how about yours ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2018 | 08:18 PM
  #346  
rmk9785e's Avatar
rmk9785e
Driver
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 89
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Baetke
Yes, the IAT is part of the MAF sensor. You can get the part number right off the top of the unit. Its in the intake snorkel between the air filter and the throttle body. It has a connector with 5 wires going into it. The part number on mine is 22204-07010.
On second look at your data PIDS I see that there is a line for "Short Term Fuel Trim - Bank 2" and "Bank 2 Sensor 1 Short Term Fuel Trim". This is peculiar. They should have the same value and I don't know why there would be two descriptions for the same sensor. The value on the second one looks reasonable. Can your scan tool plot data? If so, make a graph of the B2S1 data and go for a drive. It should go rich on wide open throttle and lean when you coast. It should be <10% at a steady cruise.
Thank you. My scan tool is kind of old and only runs on Windows with limited ability to graph. Which Bluetooth ODB device and app do you recommend?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2018 | 04:26 AM
  #347  
joetifosi's Avatar
joetifosi
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 21
Likes: 3
From: NY
Cool use quality gas

It may sound strange but i have found that the cheaper economy gas stations have gas that may have more alcohol content or lacks the additives that quality gas has.I only use brand name fuel and get about 17.1 MPG.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 10:55 PM
  #348  
rmk9785e's Avatar
rmk9785e
Driver
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 89
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default P0171 + p1155

Originally Posted by Baetke
Yes, the IAT is part of the MAF sensor. You can get the part number right off the top of the unit. Its in the intake snorkel between the air filter and the throttle body. It has a connector with 5 wires going into it. The part number on mine is 22204-07010.
On second look at your data PIDS I see that there is a line for "Short Term Fuel Trim - Bank 2" and "Bank 2 Sensor 1 Short Term Fuel Trim". This is peculiar. They should have the same value and I don't know why there would be two descriptions for the same sensor. The value on the second one looks reasonable. Can your scan tool plot data? If so, make a graph of the B2S1 data and go for a drive. It should go rich on wide open throttle and lean when you coast. It should be <10% at a steady cruise.
Attached is the best I could do with my current software. I am getting P0171 and P1155 together and the engine idles rough as if it is going to shut down.
Does this provide any hints at what may be causing the rough idle and fuel efficeinecy of around 11 mpg?


The two codes at this time












Attached Files
File Type: pdf
test results.pdf (75.1 KB, 164 views)
File Type: pdf
Fuel Trim.pdf (109.9 KB, 173 views)
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2018 | 05:50 PM
  #349  
TechyInAZ's Avatar
TechyInAZ
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 21
Likes: 2
From: AZ
Default

I get around 20-21MPG in my 1999 RX 300. Used to be at 15mpg with previous owners, but since i've had the car i used 91 octane fuel and have also given the car several engine cleaners and switched to a full synthetic oil.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2018 | 08:27 PM
  #350  
rmk9785e's Avatar
rmk9785e
Driver
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 89
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by TechyInAZ
I get around 20-21MPG in my 1999 RX 300. Used to be at 15mpg with previous owners, but since i've had the car i used 91 octane fuel and have also given the car several engine cleaners and switched to a full synthetic oil.
That's impressive if it's in city driving. I'm getting around 15mpg in city driving with regular gas. I didn't realize a combination of higher octane/engine cleaners/synthetic oil could boost it by 25%.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2018 | 09:11 PM
  #351  
TechyInAZ's Avatar
TechyInAZ
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 21
Likes: 2
From: AZ
Default

Well I don't do HEAVY city driving, I'd say light to medium amounts, cause where i live there isn't a whole lot of traffic. Mostly HWY driving. But I don't drive like a granny either. My best guess is that there was a lot of sludge in my engine.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2018 | 06:33 PM
  #352  
dindih's Avatar
dindih
Driver School Candidate
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 1
From: DE
Default Your main problem is your Bank 2 A/F ratio sensor 1

rmk9785e,
Focus on P1155 first and ignore P0171 initially (general too lean code usually goes away after you fix P1155).

You should change your Bank 2 sensor 1, that is the one you have easy access from the front of the car. Its electrical (heater) circuit is gone. After that, clear all the codes, drive and see what code comes next, if any. This is your best plan of action. Search this forum and elsewhere, it is not a difficult DIY. There are excellent write-ups on how to fix P1155 (or change B2S1 A/F ratio sensor).

You can buy the Denso A/F ratio sensor (OEM) from Ebay, Amazon, or elsewhere. Don't buy a knockout, buy a Geniune OEM Denso 234-9009, in this case the OEM really does matter due to tight controls on these sensors. I am speaking from the personal experience. Make sure the Toyota or Denso name is on the packaging. Below are some examples, you may find even better deals if you search. (I have no connections to any of the three below, buy at your own risk/reward):

https://www.ebay.com/itm/OEM-AIR-FUE...-/253585820753
https://www.ebay.com/itm/234-9009-De...-/273289772811
https://www.amazon.com/Denso-234-9009-Oxygen-Sensor/dp/B000C5YCZ2 https://www.amazon.com/Denso-234-9009-Oxygen-Sensor/dp/B000C5YCZ2


[QUOTE=rmk9785e;10157749]Attached is the best I could do with my current software. I am getting P0171 and P1155 together and the engine idles rough as if it is going to shut down.
Does this provide any hints at what may be causing the rough idle and fuel efficeinecy of around 11 mpg?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2018 | 08:26 AM
  #353  
ssgi4in12's Avatar
ssgi4in12
Rookie
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 50
Likes: 1
From: Ab
Default

I am still not able to figure out why my car consumes way too much fuel. On a full tank with 50-50 between city and highway, I am getting about 17.5l/100km. That's about 13.44 MPG. Let me add that my car is a 2002 awd European spec. And it has about 183,000 miles on the odo. Any help will be appreciated.

Simon
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2018 | 11:16 AM
  #354  
dindih's Avatar
dindih
Driver School Candidate
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 1
From: DE
Default

Originally Posted by ssgi4in12
I am still not able to figure out why my car consumes way too much fuel. On a full tank with 50-50 between city and highway, I am getting about 17.5l/100km. That's about 13.44 MPG. Let me add that my car is a 2002 awd European spec. And it has about 183,000 miles on the odo. Any help will be appreciated.

Simon
I am getting 15-16 mpg in city driving using regular gasoline with my 2000 RX300 AWD which is at 150,000 miles.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2019 | 11:19 PM
  #355  
Kabuku's Avatar
Kabuku
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

I second that! I inherited an RX and the previous owner said they’d used nothing but mid grade since buying new from the dealership. I came home, filled up with low grade and within a week or so, blew an AF sensor (bank 1). Was an easy fix, but I haven’t had any issues by using mid grade since then.
Reply
Old May 4, 2019 | 09:37 AM
  #356  
TenaClubz's Avatar
TenaClubz
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 36
Likes: 1
From: WI
Default

Originally Posted by zombie
I add a bottle of chevron fuel injector cleaner every time i change my oil,
Your not putting that stuff in the oil I hope, it's supposed to go in your fuel
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2019 | 04:17 PM
  #357  
clayota's Avatar
clayota
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 4
Likes: 1
From: AZ
Default

My 2003 RX300 with AWD gets about 18 in the summer in Scottsdale and 20 in the winter. I do notice a slight bump in fuel economy when using the high test from Costco. I do a mix of freeway and sidestreet driving. I drive it like I stole it. Gentle on the accelerator and brake pedal. Still runs strong for a car with only 207k miles on it.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2019 | 07:48 PM
  #358  
rohanp's Avatar
rohanp
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: VIC
Default RX 300 (1999) Fuel Consumption

I own an RX300 1999, 100k on the odo and have a problem with fuel consumption.
Orginal fuel consumption until recently was 6 km/l which dropped to 3.3 km/l.
Used Toyota diagnostic tool and it showed that one O2 sensor was bad.
Therefore, I changed all three O2 sensors and in addition cleaned all 6 injectors, found a small exhaust gas leak and this was attended too.
Reset the onboard computer. Then the reading starts from 6 km/l and drops again to 3.3 km/l.
Can anyone tell me what could possibly be wrong?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2019 | 02:51 AM
  #359  
carguy07's Avatar
carguy07
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 77
From: OH
Default

Is it still showing any code(s)?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2019 | 10:17 AM
  #360  
onetongwa's Avatar
onetongwa
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: louisiana
Default I have decent gas mileage.

I have the 2001 AWD model, and Either everyone else gas sucks or Im just lucky, I easily get the 19 miles per gallon city And even 20 on great no traffic conditions. And on good long out of town highway cruising days I sometimes see 26 mpg or more average. I will say this vehicle cannot compete with my previous 2014 kia optima that was seeing 32 or 34 highway all the time and 28 city, however this vehicle is built similar to a truck and gets similar mileage for some people. I can go through ditches and mud and rain and ice easily and I feel safe. And I cannot drive that way in my car. I deal with the trade off. I do hope you guys can see better fuel economy. I agree these vehicles can drink fuel. My vehicle sticker said 18 to 22, So I knew upfront and most of you guys should at least be getting that. These engines do have great gas mileage, however for the Rx was tuned for more power and the greater weight causes fuel mpg loss.

Last edited by onetongwa; Nov 5, 2019 at 11:53 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:04 PM.