Notices
Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

Gs400 exaust mods question

Old Jul 14, 2022 | 06:07 PM
  #1  
Frontage's Avatar
Frontage
Thread Starter
3rd Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: M
Default Gs400 exaust mods question

I want to know what would be a good piping size for my 1998 gs400. I want to do a catback , was looking at the one from dna and it says it has 2.75 piping. idc about sound really I just want the best performance . I’ve heard people say even with Borla Exaust they lost a little power and they are the brand I’ve heard about the most at far as the 1998 Gs400 Goes. But if losing power is something that I’ll just have to deal with because I want an exaust then oh well, just let me know though so I know what I’m getting myself in to

so bottom line my question is what is “too big” as I do not want to loose low end or mid end power.And If I do get an exaust that loses power and I also get my car tuned (Apexi Maybe) , will that lost power be regained via tune? I’m a noob I’m sorry.

Couldn’t find anything on the forum about this and I’ve been looking around for about a week. Also I don’t know much about exaust in general so explaining it in terms a 8 year old would understand would be nice, .

Please no “I thinks”. im looking for cold hard facts only, nothing less. Preferably but not exclusive to people who’ve actually owned this car and mod but anything thats facts would help. Thanks



Last edited by Frontage; Jul 14, 2022 at 06:14 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2022 | 10:38 AM
  #2  
DrC10's Avatar
DrC10
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 23
Likes: 7
From: AZ
Default

I have a 2000 GS400. Removed single in/single out center resonator and installed a 2.25" X pipe to replace it. Went 2.25" pipe from back side of cat flanges to x pipe, same size pipe back to 12" long glass packs in place of factory resonators, and 71235 Flowmaster Flow F/X rear mufflers with 4" double wall angle cut tips. Looks just like factory, does not drone at highway speeds, and has an excellent tone at WOT that turns heads. No complaints at all after 2 years of daily use.
IMHO anything over that pipe diameter would be excessive and might cause fitment issues around the rear subframe.
Performance gain was NOTABLE right away.
I have used the X pipe mod on my SC430 as well, with noticeable results.
Can get you part numbers on the resonators and X pipe if you want...easy to find on FleaBay or Amazon.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2022 | 12:31 PM
  #3  
Frontage's Avatar
Frontage
Thread Starter
3rd Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: M
Default

@drc10 Yes please that would be Amazing Bro, so you are saying anything over 2.25 will cause a lost in performance?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2022 | 12:45 PM
  #4  
DrC10's Avatar
DrC10
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 23
Likes: 7
From: AZ
Default

RESONATORS 3512002S, best price I found was on eBay
X PIPE Lawson 66922 on Amazon
TIPS https://www.ebay.com/itm/16120564617...53.m1438.l2649

I don't think going to a 2.5" pipe would net you any more performance. The system is only going to be as efficient as its smallest diameter upstream. The 2.25 pipe is almost exactly the same diameter is the catalyst outlets, so that's what I ran with. Local exhaust shop did an awesome job of bending the pipe and installing everything for about $350, and it uses all of the factory hangers!
The mufflers I used have the correct offset to center the rear mufflers in the space, and also puts the tips right in the rear valance cutouts. I didn't have to trim anything.
I will post some pics tonight, driving the SC today and enjoying the 110+ weather here in Tucson...

Cheers
Jack




Reply
Old Jul 20, 2022 | 12:42 PM
  #5  
captainva's Avatar
captainva
Instructor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 273
From: Virginia
Default

Too large and you lose low end power and torque as well
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2022 | 12:56 PM
  #6  
Frontage's Avatar
Frontage
Thread Starter
3rd Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: M
Default

Originally Posted by captainva
Too large and you lose low end power and torque as well

@captainva what diameter/specs would be considered just Right for the GS400 ? I was going to order the parts @drc10 sent but if I can get a second voice with other options that would be cool too
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2022 | 09:41 AM
  #7  
captainva's Avatar
captainva
Instructor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 273
From: Virginia
Default

2.25" is probably the sweet spot for a GS400 with a for a stock engine and is personally what I would use if it were my vehicle. 2.5" would probably be ok too but that's getting into the too large of diameter IMO. Even 2.25" is too large for a stock GS300
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Atazeon
Performance
4
Sep 20, 2022 03:12 PM
Greg1976
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
36
Feb 23, 2016 11:02 AM
pitmanr200
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
10
Jan 9, 2008 04:08 PM
w_star_001
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
7
Jul 16, 2006 08:57 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:43 AM.