Hey piggybackers
The Ultimate and FIC8 both can drive a V8 engine. How much boost are you planning on running?
ROPADOPA, the car is still running on the GE ecu believe it or not haha. That's the only way it's possible for the car to pass the OBD-II inspecion. To read the datastream for the JDM ecu, just order a scan tool from overseas and that should work ok.
ROPADOPA, the car is still running on the GE ecu believe it or not haha. That's the only way it's possible for the car to pass the OBD-II inspecion. To read the datastream for the JDM ecu, just order a scan tool from overseas and that should work ok.
ROPADOPA, the car is still running on the GE ecu believe it or not haha. That's the only way it's possible for the car to pass the OBD-II inspecion. To read the datastream for the JDM ecu, just order a scan tool from overseas and that should work ok.
The Ultimate and FIC8 both can drive a V8 engine. How much boost are you planning on running?
Around 6 psi of boost
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
ting.
However I don't think unplugging the o2 snesors is a good idea. Yes it'll force open loop operation but you're also not sure how many other failsafe mode issues you're running into. I wouldn't be surprised if the systems will also affect timing and shift logic as a by product. You'll loose cruise control if you have it functioning as well.
And it will cause your AFR's to be off based on ethanol content and fuel temperature.
The emanage ultimate and AEM FIC allow you to send a skewed reading back from the o2 so the stock ecu will not learn it out. The AFC does not have that capability. Hence why the greddy and FIC are better options amongst other reasons.
Then either system will be ok. The emanage can't control ignition timing on a v8 because of the way it operates. You will basically just run on the factory ignition map. The FIC can pull timing only.
However I don't think unplugging the o2 snesors is a good idea. Yes it'll force open loop operation but you're also not sure how many other failsafe mode issues you're running into. I wouldn't be surprised if the systems will also affect timing and shift logic as a by product. You'll loose cruise control if you have it functioning as well.
And it will cause your AFR's to be off based on ethanol content and fuel temperature.
The emanage ultimate and AEM FIC allow you to send a skewed reading back from the o2 so the stock ecu will not learn it out. The AFC does not have that capability. Hence why the greddy and FIC are better options amongst other reasons.
The car will just run a static map all the time if you run with no O2 sensors. Shifting does not change, and the cruise control still works. It's a bad idea to do it because your AFR will not stay at a targeted 14.7. You will have to flash different maps during the day and night when the temperature changes.
Also, when tuning, you do not have to skew the O2 signal(unless you want to change the narrowband voltage oscillation a little bit to save some gas). Just tune so that the fuel trims stay in check and you're golden.
However I don't think unplugging the o2 snesors is a good idea. Yes it'll force open loop operation but you're also not sure how many other failsafe mode issues you're running into. I wouldn't be surprised if the systems will also affect timing and shift logic as a by product. You'll loose cruise control if you have it functioning as well.
And it will cause your AFR's to be off based on ethanol content and fuel temperature.
The emanage ultimate and AEM FIC allow you to send a skewed reading back from the o2 so the stock ecu will not learn it out. The AFC does not have that capability. Hence why the greddy and FIC are better options amongst other reasons.
If I needed to go piggy back I would run an HKS Fcon iS. You still have awesome resolution for tuning as well as good closed loop functionality. Nothing beats HKS's feedback compensation setups in the Vpro. It can use a 100Hz wideband sensor to it's full potential. You can change the correction volume as well as the sensor cycle time. It's also the fastest correction I've ever seen.
Only catch is you'll need an HKS Pro tuner to tune it, which is a good thing because typically HKS Pro certified tuners know their **** and will tune your car properly.
So we are talking about the same thing only you assume that ecu compensates soley on o2 input which I'm going to tell you, you're wrong.
I know O2 input isnt the only compensation table, I never said it was, that's your assumption. All the other fuel comp tables in the ECU are fixed values (water, air, accel, decel, speed, etc) the only one that changes is the O2 feedback table.
Just out of curiosity, what have you tuned, and what ecu's have you used?
Last edited by Bippu147; Feb 17, 2012 at 12:47 PM.
You assumed that our conversation shards strictly air temp has extended to barometric pressure as well.
Since you seem to want to push credentials now, I've tuned haltech, AEM, emanage, autronic, open source on Subaru. I'm also an engineer for a major oe.
Thinking more to the issues Jeff has seen with it swinging without having O2 input, I'm wondering if latency difference becomes the issue. Piggyback is doing stricly a pulse width compensation based on % size difference with no regard to lantency and how it alters your mid to low pulse width areas.



