Dyno Tomorrow!!! any estimates???
Kharizma,
I do remmber seeing your dyno post and have always been very curious as to what it was done on. Your # are very high most for only getting to 3500rpm. your TQ of 300 is far higer than any I've seen on even w/ SRT. Not saying that it is wrong just curious. It could be that be a spike or something while trying to keep the wheels on the dyno.
Try and do it in 4th gear if possibe. I lot do it in 3rd since it is easier.
At least your using the sme dyno that is good. As what DaveGS$ was saying, most w/ your set up were not getting 360+ rwhp w/ that pulley & significant FMU I think from what I recall the 3.12 pulley was only getting less than 5psi. Morris is one of the rare few that got HP #'s w/ just S-AFC someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Good luck on your dyno today. You should do good if you have a decent tuner.
I do remmber seeing your dyno post and have always been very curious as to what it was done on. Your # are very high most for only getting to 3500rpm. your TQ of 300 is far higer than any I've seen on even w/ SRT. Not saying that it is wrong just curious. It could be that be a spike or something while trying to keep the wheels on the dyno.
Try and do it in 4th gear if possibe. I lot do it in 3rd since it is easier.
At least your using the sme dyno that is good. As what DaveGS$ was saying, most w/ your set up were not getting 360+ rwhp w/ that pulley & significant FMU I think from what I recall the 3.12 pulley was only getting less than 5psi. Morris is one of the rare few that got HP #'s w/ just S-AFC someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Good luck on your dyno today. You should do good if you have a decent tuner.
Last edited by GILLEXUS; Apr 20, 2007 at 09:21 AM.
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 8,702
Likes: 5
From: California
Doing some simple math I would say:
SAFC, 330CC injectors, 3:12 pulley = 5lbs of boost = 75HP + 244HP = 319 rwHP ( 334 rwHP max.)
As I can best recall, the performance that RMM advertised on their site 5+ years ago, they did claim power gains in the range of 75 to 90 HP.
SAFC, 330CC injectors, 3:12 pulley = 5lbs of boost = 75HP + 244HP = 319 rwHP ( 334 rwHP max.)
As I can best recall, the performance that RMM advertised on their site 5+ years ago, they did claim power gains in the range of 75 to 90 HP.
Last edited by RMMGS4; Apr 19, 2007 at 11:02 AM.
I got 361rwhp on upgraded fuel pump and 440cc injectors with the SAFC2.
With your setup I would say 315-320rwhp. Your pulley is too small and you will have fuel problems, or lack thereof
Good luck,
Jonny
With your setup I would say 315-320rwhp. Your pulley is too small and you will have fuel problems, or lack thereof
Good luck,
Jonny
got it done today
337.0 rwhp
309.3 rwtq
this is corrected for the altitude and on a dyno dynamics dyno
they say that on a dyno jet i would have 380+
i'm going to get some more supporting mods along with meth injection and such and will dyno + tune again. oh and edit to my price for my dyno + tuning. instead of 200 it ran me $100 ^_^ i guess it isn't that bad they expect me to run low 14's with my set up.
337.0 rwhp
309.3 rwtq
this is corrected for the altitude and on a dyno dynamics dyno
they say that on a dyno jet i would have 380+
i'm going to get some more supporting mods along with meth injection and such and will dyno + tune again. oh and edit to my price for my dyno + tuning. instead of 200 it ran me $100 ^_^ i guess it isn't that bad they expect me to run low 14's with my set up.
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 8,702
Likes: 5
From: California
got it done today
337.0 rwhp
309.3 rwtq
this is corrected for the altitude and on a dyno dynamics dyno
they say that on a dyno jet i would have 380+
i'm going to get some more supporting mods along with meth injection and such and will dyno + tune again. oh and edit to my price for my dyno + tuning. instead of 200 it ran me $100 ^_^ i guess it isn't that bad they expect me to run low 14's with my set up.
337.0 rwhp
309.3 rwtq
this is corrected for the altitude and on a dyno dynamics dyno
they say that on a dyno jet i would have 380+
i'm going to get some more supporting mods along with meth injection and such and will dyno + tune again. oh and edit to my price for my dyno + tuning. instead of 200 it ran me $100 ^_^ i guess it isn't that bad they expect me to run low 14's with my set up.
Doing the math, the Dyno Dynamics would measure over a 10% less HP gain than DynoJet. What is difference between the Dyno Dynamics versus a DynoJet that would cause that much of a drop in HP?
Pole Position
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 358
Likes: 3
From: FL
first congrats on the numbers, they are not bad at all. don't let them fool you on that dynojet claim though. dynojets do tend to read higher than dyno dynamics dynos, but not 13% higher. unless they don't know how to calibrate their dyno. i've dynoed the same car on both dynos and can tell you the difference was way less than that.
Low 14's in the quarter with 337whp...no waaaaayyyy! That must mean I am running 15's in the quarter with my non FI GS4! I am sad now...
Your #'s are nice BTW... that means you have a 400HP GS on your hands (@ the crank) - that's nice; now I want FI!
Your #'s are nice BTW... that means you have a 400HP GS on your hands (@ the crank) - that's nice; now I want FI!
Dang, Dave that is pretty close. Want to pick some lottery numbers for me
Kharizma- What boost are you getting and what is your A/F at.
That's a pretty good HP # but of course It's never enough
Kharizma- What boost are you getting and what is your A/F at.
That's a pretty good HP # but of course It's never enough
Last edited by GILLEXUS; Apr 21, 2007 at 07:34 AM.
!! these numbers suck lol
time for nitrous intercooler spray, meth injection, headers, custom exhaust, vb upgrade and not sure what else lol but i'm determined to go faster!
time for nitrous intercooler spray, meth injection, headers, custom exhaust, vb upgrade and not sure what else lol but i'm determined to go faster!
