Notices
Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

Headers for V8 cars, Please read

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #331  
ChronoJ1's Avatar
ChronoJ1
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 1
From: IL
Default

As soon as I see some numbers I am in!
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #332  
SCV8's Avatar
SCV8
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 1
From: Seattle
Default

I am about to initiate a project here after doing some research that I had no time for before, and could use some flanges, had planned on just hogging some out with a torch, or waterjet even.
Let us know if you could sell the flanges separately, I for one, may be interested.
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 03:11 PM
  #333  
JBrady's Avatar
JBrady
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,124
Likes: 32
From: Texas
Default

Show Time!

First of all lets review the stock passenger side manifold.

Look at the HORRIBLE 90 degree intersection the both of the back 2 ports dump into. There is virtually no runner length and the construction is appaling in that the runners overlap the downstream pipe leaving a sharp inside edge on top of the 90 degree turn and no runner length. The front tube is the only one on this manifold that has any use. The second from the front enters the front tube again at 90 degrees and with the same internal sharp edge. Score, 3 bad ports and one decent port.
Attached Thumbnails Headers for V8 cars, Please read-im001196.jpg  
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 03:19 PM
  #334  
JBrady's Avatar
JBrady
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,124
Likes: 32
From: Texas
Default

Now, look at the prototype.

Each runner exits smoothly and directs the exhaust energy towards the catalyst inlet. Notice how the front 2 runners join in a nice merge collector, same happens with the rear 2 runners. This manifold will flow much better at ALL RPMs.
Attached Thumbnails Headers for V8 cars, Please read-im001413.jpg  
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 03:22 PM
  #335  
JBrady's Avatar
JBrady
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,124
Likes: 32
From: Texas
Default

Shown with the heat shield on the prototype.
Attached Thumbnails Headers for V8 cars, Please read-im001404.jpg  
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #336  
Hollywood's Avatar
Hollywood
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Default

My previous discussion in another thread;

Originally Posted by Hollywood
But there must be so much power lost in the headers. DaveGS4 says there is only like 2 hp gained from swapping a cat back exhaust??? It really should be that way unless the cats are mega restrictive or the headers are so bad that you cant even see gains from a performance cat back.

Put it this way if you can make gains with replacing the intake (which I have read in these forums), and not from the exhaust then there is somthing seriously holding back the power between the exhaust side of the heads to y pipe. Judging by the pics I have seen in the big header thread, it looks like the headers are the culprit.
Originally Posted by RMMGS4
That is a good assumption, however if the design of intake , exhaust and header was already designed well from the factory, then your theory could be wrong. Also depending on who's post you read, the change in intake AND exhaust does yield an overall improvement. Too many people do exhaust first and don't do the intake as well, then they give credit to the intake when they add it later, as if the exhaust didn't contribute. The science of providing good breathing and exhaust doesn't really change here.

I discussed this exact question with Bruce Nomura and he said the factory header design was not that bad. He felt the installation of well designed headers can yield some improvement, but not as significant as one would think.
Now someone who agree's with me.

Originally Posted by jbrady
Show Time!

First of all lets review the stock passenger side manifold.

Look at the HORRIBLE 90 degree intersection the both of the back 2 ports dump into. There is virtually no runner length and the construction is appaling in that the runners overlap the downstream pipe leaving a sharp inside edge on top of the 90 degree turn and no runner length. The front tube is the only one on this manifold that has any use. The second from the front enters the front tube again at 90 degrees and with the same internal sharp edge. Score, 3 bad ports and one decent port.
Honestly, the stock design looks like ****, even neon's and honda stock manifolds are nicer than this even. No offence to "Bruce", but I do not agree with him at all.
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 10:47 AM
  #337  
JBrady's Avatar
JBrady
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,124
Likes: 32
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Hollywood
Honestly, the stock design looks like ****, even neon's and honda stock manifolds are nicer than this even. No offence to "Bruce", but I do not agree with him at all.
Hollywood, yes, I agree that the stock Lexus manifolds are poor at best. The intake on the 1998+ is actually VERY nice utilizing a two stage runner length and very nice angles and volumes. How anyone who has looked at these manifolds state that they are even average is beyond me. A basic cast iron manifold would be better.
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #338  
JBrady's Avatar
JBrady
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,124
Likes: 32
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by lex400pshR
Any pix of the drivers side header?
When is the estimated time to actually have these ready for sale?
No pics because it hasnt been built yet.

I will be sending this back to be completed for pre-production. If the fabricator will go ahead and build the driver side pre production part we should hope to have these available in 30-60 days.
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 12:29 PM
  #339  
Hollywood's Avatar
Hollywood
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by jbrady
No pics because it hasnt been built yet.

I will be sending this back to be completed for pre-production. If the fabricator will go ahead and build the driver side pre production part we should hope to have these available in 30-60 days.
Sweet! Nice work. Your's look nice too. Nothing wrong with mild steel except it's weight difference over stainless. But it is considerably cheaper for everyone.
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 03:13 PM
  #340  
fhumphrey04's Avatar
fhumphrey04
Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Default

wow! this sounds pretty exciting and if the cost is what it was originally estimated at I will be in on these babies..........that is if people dyno them with anything over 10-15whp gains.

The stock design obviously had flaws and the aftermarket one looked MUCH better.

Ok well here is what I will need before I decide to do this (when they are available)

1) some responses as to how loud it is over the stockers.
2) ease of install.
3) ability to pass a regular smog check
4) performance #s with a dyno sheet
5) exact price figure

otherwise they sound like they are great
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 03:44 PM
  #341  
TAMR_GUS98's Avatar
TAMR_GUS98
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 4
From: NorCal
Exclamation Better that stock manifold.

Originally Posted by jbrady
Now, look at the prototype.

Each runner exits smoothly and directs the exhaust energy towards the catalyst inlet. Notice how the front 2 runners join in a nice merge collector, same happens with the rear 2 runners. This manifold will flow much better at ALL RPMs.
I would have to agree. This is much better than stock. Cann't wait for the real world assessment.
Will
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #342  
TLW's Avatar
TLW
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 14,523
Likes: 3
From: new jersey
Default

i would also like to know how loud will these be

they look great ...and comparing old to new ..i can see the great improvement

for $600 they seem very affordable

any clue on degree of diffuculty on remving and installing ??
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 04:42 PM
  #343  
NoRyceGS4's Avatar
NoRyceGS4
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Loud is no problem for me! Cant wait!
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #344  
Hollywood's Avatar
Hollywood
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Default

Personally I dont need to wait for the assesment. I know they will be better. I'm ready to buy.
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 08:15 PM
  #345  
Dx3's Avatar
Dx3
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,681
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Default

Guys,

I am very interested but a little confused. If someone could answer these questions I would greatly appreciate it. They will be going on a 95 Sc400.

1. Approximate labor time including reworking for the SC400?

2. The write-up says this about the 95 SC400 - No EGR provisions will be made so the installer will need to consider this if they choose to retain EGR.

What exactly does this mean? Oklahoma does not have inspections so I don't have to worry about that - but will this not mean I will have a CEL on all the time?

Thx,

Jonny



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:59 PM.