twin turbo kit
01-14-11, 03:54 PM
#1
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ar
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
twin turbo kit
I found this
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1JZGT...Q5fAccessories
and will 2 td05 16g's do good ? they are pretty cheap
please put input in thanks guys.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1JZGT...Q5fAccessories
and will 2 td05 16g's do good ? they are pretty cheap
please put input in thanks guys.
01-14-11, 04:10 PM
#2
You do know that's only for the manifold correct?
IMHO I would skip doing a twin setup, too much hassle and headaches to get everything done right. You would still have a lot of fabrication to deal with, the downpipes for one.
The money spent to get twins to work properly could get you a very nice single and most of the required parts. That single will produce just as much if not more than the output of the twins.
IMHO I would skip doing a twin setup, too much hassle and headaches to get everything done right. You would still have a lot of fabrication to deal with, the downpipes for one.
The money spent to get twins to work properly could get you a very nice single and most of the required parts. That single will produce just as much if not more than the output of the twins.
01-14-11, 06:19 PM
#8
What are your power goals?
Auto, manual?
Standalone, piggy back?
Injectors?
Mods?
A GT35R should give you good spool and around ~450ish with supporting mods. Garrett ball bearing turbos are pricey though. Borg Warner S362 is a good option as well; they are some of the fastest spooling journal bearing turbos out there at a substantially lower price.
Auto, manual?
Standalone, piggy back?
Injectors?
Mods?
A GT35R should give you good spool and around ~450ish with supporting mods. Garrett ball bearing turbos are pricey though. Borg Warner S362 is a good option as well; they are some of the fastest spooling journal bearing turbos out there at a substantially lower price.
01-18-11, 06:59 AM
#12
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have many options if you are only looking for 300-400 hp, but the twins idea I would throw out the window, especially for that power out put. A small single like a GT3076 would go great. However if you desperately wanted twins and only aiming for that power and not much more, USDM Supra TT twins will do the job, they are getting over 450WHP on Supra's. I wanted twins so bad because they just look mean, but then reality kicks in. twins means two, of everything... Two turbos, two waste gates, two oil drain lines, two oil feed lines two down pipes. lol that's a lot of dough, I could put money elsewhere and make a true performer.
01-21-11, 08:56 AM
#13
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ar
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The more I look going single will be better thanks guys for your input, I am about to order this in a few days http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...m=170520674319 I have a 93 auto im going to swap that into it just gathering info (have been for almost a year now) and part lists etc, this is going to be fun 
01-21-11, 09:31 AM
#14
Eff that do twins just because its pimp, but it will end up costing more
And then here's how it looks pretty much finished:
It was getting a little busy so Rick moved the battery to the trunk, and you can see we added the AEM methanol/water kit to allow boosting higher on pump gas as well as for the beneficial cooling effects, lower oil temps, etc when hammering on it for extended periods/track sessions.
Being the multi-talented guy he is, Rick also tuned my AEM and I'm very happy with the results.
I hate dyno charts that are not RPM based, but we're working on getting better info. The logs say this one below was up to 8650 rpm so that's probably the last vertical line on the scale. In any case, I'm not sure what any dyno graph will show us considering all the variables, we were there to do tuning and made over a dozen runs.
This was at 1.5 bar on 93 pump and I also sprayed 50/50 methanol/H2O so basically it shows 600 whp at 21.7 psi. I'm sure it was helped by the head porting and cams, so the power seems to hold right to redline and beyond
I do know my first impression driving this was that it was more responsive than my previous PHR Stg 1, 60-1, on a cast manifold setup. Not sure that's real or just impressions, but even if it is not more responsive, this setup exceeded my goals and expectations since it's plenty responsive for me, track feel yet to be determined at a track day pretty soon.
It was getting a little busy so Rick moved the battery to the trunk, and you can see we added the AEM methanol/water kit to allow boosting higher on pump gas as well as for the beneficial cooling effects, lower oil temps, etc when hammering on it for extended periods/track sessions.
Being the multi-talented guy he is, Rick also tuned my AEM and I'm very happy with the results.
I hate dyno charts that are not RPM based, but we're working on getting better info. The logs say this one below was up to 8650 rpm so that's probably the last vertical line on the scale. In any case, I'm not sure what any dyno graph will show us considering all the variables, we were there to do tuning and made over a dozen runs.
This was at 1.5 bar on 93 pump and I also sprayed 50/50 methanol/H2O so basically it shows 600 whp at 21.7 psi. I'm sure it was helped by the head porting and cams, so the power seems to hold right to redline and beyond
I do know my first impression driving this was that it was more responsive than my previous PHR Stg 1, 60-1, on a cast manifold setup. Not sure that's real or just impressions, but even if it is not more responsive, this setup exceeded my goals and expectations since it's plenty responsive for me, track feel yet to be determined at a track day pretty soon.
01-21-11, 09:41 AM
#15
TD05 16g's are great turbos.
On a 2.0 4g63, they usually do around 350AWHP per turbo on average. MHI turbos are rugged, and all steel.
In my case it wouldn't be too bad, because I can fabricate my own stuff.
But to pay someone to get it on there, they will see it as a labor goldmine.
On a 2.0 4g63, they usually do around 350AWHP per turbo on average. MHI turbos are rugged, and all steel.
In my case it wouldn't be too bad, because I can fabricate my own stuff.
But to pay someone to get it on there, they will see it as a labor goldmine.
