View Poll Results: Which is better for NA-T: AEM EMS or Split Second?
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll
AEM EMS vs. Split Second for NA-T
02-12-06, 03:28 AM
#1
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Behind you
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AEM EMS vs. Split Second for NA-T
I was recently informed of a piggy back fuel controller that offers full timing control at less than half the cost of an AEM EMS:
http://www.splitsec.com
How do you think this compares to the AEM EMS, especially for 2JZ NA-T applications? Commentary on why you folks voted for either one over the other would be much apprecited.
http://www.splitsec.com
How do you think this compares to the AEM EMS, especially for 2JZ NA-T applications? Commentary on why you folks voted for either one over the other would be much apprecited.
Last edited by dejacky; 02-12-06 at 01:40 PM.
02-12-06, 02:15 PM
#4
Lead Lap
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I used the SplitSec on my older VR4 back in the day. It's kinda outdated now. Now personally if I were building a NA-T, I'd go with the AEM EMS or the HKS FCon V Pro. Both with all the goodies. More towards the V Pro though. MMMMM Tasty. And what FullRace manifold. I wanna see.
02-12-06, 03:17 PM
#5
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Behind you
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PM Supra
your trying to save money on a EMS and you're wanting one of those Full Race manifolds.
. I want to know how these two fuel control solutions compare and who's had experience with them. Thanks for staying on topic SinisterSC 
.
Last edited by dejacky; 02-12-06 at 03:30 PM.
02-12-06, 07:09 PM
#6
Split second sucks.
Their stuff is overpriced in every segment, and doesn't touch what their competition does.
For piggybacks:
Expencive top tier
SMT-7 > E-Manage Gold > Everything else
Former top tier, now mid-pack & low priced
SMT-6 > E-Manage > SS FTC-1 (in dead last of "advanced" piggybacks)
Anything AFC should be avoided at all costs.
You could turbo one with an SMT6, or 7 using a MAP sensor to tune fuel, and ignition & have the stock ECU happy & not be too **** about re-learning. Imagination can use their capabilities to overcome & achive in practice nearly anything a stand along can.
If you want a fully stand alone
Megasquirt
AEM (Because AEM is cheaper)
then anything else.
Their stuff is overpriced in every segment, and doesn't touch what their competition does.
For piggybacks:
Expencive top tier
SMT-7 > E-Manage Gold > Everything else
Former top tier, now mid-pack & low priced
SMT-6 > E-Manage > SS FTC-1 (in dead last of "advanced" piggybacks)
Anything AFC should be avoided at all costs.
You could turbo one with an SMT6, or 7 using a MAP sensor to tune fuel, and ignition & have the stock ECU happy & not be too **** about re-learning. Imagination can use their capabilities to overcome & achive in practice nearly anything a stand along can.
If you want a fully stand alone
Megasquirt
AEM (Because AEM is cheaper)
then anything else.
Trending Topics
12-04-06, 05:57 AM
#11
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Behind you
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Split second sucks.
Their stuff is overpriced in every segment, and doesn't touch what their competition does.
For piggybacks:
Expencive top tier
SMT-7 > E-Manage Gold > Everything else
Former top tier, now mid-pack & low priced
SMT-6 > E-Manage > SS FTC-1 (in dead last of "advanced" piggybacks)
Anything AFC should be avoided at all costs.
You could turbo one with an SMT6, or 7 using a MAP sensor to tune fuel, and ignition & have the stock ECU happy & not be too **** about re-learning. Imagination can use their capabilities to overcome & achive in practice nearly anything a stand along can.
If you want a fully stand alone
Megasquirt
AEM (Because AEM is cheaper)
then anything else.
Their stuff is overpriced in every segment, and doesn't touch what their competition does.
For piggybacks:
Expencive top tier
SMT-7 > E-Manage Gold > Everything else
Former top tier, now mid-pack & low priced
SMT-6 > E-Manage > SS FTC-1 (in dead last of "advanced" piggybacks)
Anything AFC should be avoided at all costs.
You could turbo one with an SMT6, or 7 using a MAP sensor to tune fuel, and ignition & have the stock ECU happy & not be too **** about re-learning. Imagination can use their capabilities to overcome & achive in practice nearly anything a stand along can.
If you want a fully stand alone
Megasquirt
AEM (Because AEM is cheaper)
then anything else.
12-04-06, 08:47 AM
#12
Forum Administrator
iTrader: (2)
Keep on topic please guys (removed extraneous posts)
12-04-06, 09:55 AM
#13
Pole Position
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pa
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Voted AEM(of course).
Most/all the cars we have built are running the EMS, and is where you need to be. Sure, there are more expensive and less expensive options out there, but the AEM is PROVEN to work. Simple as that. Oh, and if you want a deal on an F-R manifold, you will be forced to speak to me
Josh
(who lives by the AEM's internal logging)
Most/all the cars we have built are running the EMS, and is where you need to be. Sure, there are more expensive and less expensive options out there, but the AEM is PROVEN to work. Simple as that. Oh, and if you want a deal on an F-R manifold, you will be forced to speak to me
Josh
(who lives by the AEM's internal logging)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
