LS500 Audio Comparison

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 1, 2024 | 01:07 PM

Lockd_LX

Thread Starter

Rookie

Joined: Jun 2009

Posts: 26

Likes: 2

From: ID

LS500 Audio Comparison

Has anyone did a side by side comparison of the standard LS 500 audio versus the 23 speaker ML audio?
I am looking at getting an LS and should I be concerned if the one I end up with has the ML Audio or not.
If you have comapred, please share your honest opinion.

May 4, 2024 | 04:31 PM

TZ250

Rookie

Joined: May 2022

Posts: 39

Likes: 20

From: Arizona

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lockd_LX

I have listened to both. While the standard audio is very good, the Mark Levinson system is on another level. Your concern should be based on how important music quality is to you. This would be a difficult question for anyone to answer for you.

May 6, 2024 | 11:20 AM

Lockd_LX

Thread Starter

Rookie

Joined: Jun 2009

Posts: 26

Likes: 2

From: ID

Thanks for the feedback. Yes very important indeed. I guess I was hoping that folks would confirm that there is a difference worth paying for. I found a 500 and it does have the ML audio so I guess that I am going to go with it. Thanks though

May 7, 2024 | 06:17 AM

Fhobbs

Intermediate

Joined: Jan 2013

Posts: 338

Likes: 76

From: Tx

I have owned both and now would not buy an LS without ML.

May 7, 2024 | 02:34 PM

TZ250

Rookie

Joined: May 2022

Posts: 39

Likes: 20

From: Arizona

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lockd_LX

I am a definite audiophile, for me, the ML was a natural choice. It really is that much better than the standard audio. Best of luck with your new vehicle.

May 9, 2024 | 12:27 AM

BuyingLX

Rookie

Joined: Aug 2019

Posts: 39

Likes: 9

From: DC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fhobbs

I have owned both and now would not buy an LS without ML.

my problem is that now i would not buy any car unless it has an upgraded sound system! ML ruined me 😭

actually, i was ruined by infinti’s m37 upgraded sound system. But the ML on my LS is a whole different level.

you can only appreciate it when you get in a car with anything else.

May 11, 2024 | 05:44 AM

liazon

Advanced

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 585

Likes: 53

From: Florida

agreed. at any listening level (especially lower-mid range volumes where the surround can be utilized fully) the ML is a huge feature.

Trending Topics

General Car Conversation - 2026 Part 1

2.4k

65.3k
Wagons only!!!

72

2.1k
Con of a recognizeable car like the LC

23

1k
LC video thread

613

55.7k
Longtime LC lurker

15

441

May 12, 2024 | 08:12 AM

SpudsMcD

Pit Crew

Joined: Jul 2022

Posts: 144

Likes: 157

From: CA

Probably the most important factor is that the noise floor on the LS500 is extremely low. So you are actually able to discern the differences between the ML and the base system. Most cars/SUVs/trucks are just too noisy for it to make sense to invest in high-end audio for the vehicle, but the LS is quiet enough for it to sometimes make sense to get the ML. I don't really enjoy listening to music in the car, so I didn't get it. The base system is fine for the podcasts and books on CD that I listen to in the car. I love high-end audio, and have spent >$100K on my home 2-channel system, but for the car it just didn't make sense for me (also because the LS is my wife's car).