interference v. non-interference
well, at the risk of being a smart ***, if you maintain the car like you should, there is no risk. the only people at risk are the ones who don't follow proper maintenance schedules. in that case, if the belt breaks and ruins the engine, it's your fault and i laugh at those people.
i see people going to home depot all the time spending all kinds of money for bull**** for their houses, but the same people refuse to keep their cars in good order because it's too expensive.
i know this because i work on these people's cars!
i see people going to home depot all the time spending all kinds of money for bull**** for their houses, but the same people refuse to keep their cars in good order because it's too expensive.
i know this because i work on these people's cars!
No guys, nobody screwed up at all, we have a great group here. What I meant to say was, I hope we keep it civil, so we dont have to lock this thread. In the past, this particular topic has resulted in a lot of deleted posts, and locked threads, which is sad because its an important one. We have one school that says 95-97 is non-int, while another claims it to be.
Thats all, sorry if I confused anyone
/steps aside.
Thats all, sorry if I confused anyone

/steps aside.
you may be right there, but that's life.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChuH
Lexus Prototypes and Next-Gen Technology
16
Feb 22, 2006 11:32 PM









