Notices
LC Model (2018-present)

Lets Play Guess the 0 to 60

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2017 | 05:35 AM
  #31  
xellos's Avatar
xellos
Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 126
Likes: 2
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by missedapex
You bring up a very interesting and valid point. I don’t read it the same way that you do, but I appreciate that you could be correct. I would be astonished that an outfit such as MT would not have tried and tested the other drive modes. When I read that portion of the paragraph and tried to come to some reasoning why they would have achieved a better time using ‘Normal’ mode. I was wondering if the shift points were less aggressive in ‘Normal’ mode thusly allowing the RPMs to drop further down and into more of a ‘sweet spot’ vs the other modes. Maybe, manual shifting and Sport/Sport+ modes overshoot the peak TQ/HP curve combo that is best for acceleration given their testing parameters (temp, traction, weight…).
Yeah, it doesn't seem likely that MT wouldn't thoroughly test the LC's acceleration in all modes either. Just shocking that normal mode would put up the best numbers.
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 04:07 PM
  #32  
missedapex's Avatar
missedapex
Thread Starter
Rookie
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 59
Likes: 18
From: CA
Default

With even more ‘reviews’ (I used quotes as some of the write-ups are hardly at the level I would consider an honest review) coming in, there seems to be a very pronounced thread materializing. Which at its roots is that the LC is a beautiful luxury car that does not live up to its $100K price tag when it comes to performance even for a GT car. While I agree this can be debated for days with no clear or decisive winner. I just find it unfortunate that the LC’s performance was not fully realized with the plethora of gearing options granted by the new 10 speed. I hope the rumors around the LCF are not just rumors.
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 04:59 PM
  #33  
Frog98's Avatar
Frog98
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 477
Likes: 36
From: TX
Default

I would like to see a variation of the new LS engine in the LC. Be nice to get some of that weight down. It is a great looking car!
Reply
Old May 18, 2017 | 05:02 PM
  #34  
G Star's Avatar
G Star
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,973
Likes: 48
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by missedapex
With even more ‘reviews’ (I used quotes as some of the write-ups are hardly at the level I would consider an honest review) coming in, there seems to be a very pronounced thread materializing. Which at its roots is that the LC is a beautiful luxury car that does not live up to its $100K price tag when it comes to performance even for a GT car. While I agree this can be debated for days with no clear or decisive winner. I just find it unfortunate that the LC’s performance was not fully realized with the plethora of gearing options granted by the new 10 speed. I hope the rumors around the LCF are not just rumors.
Have some links to reviews that talk about this? The ones I've read have shown writers content with the price for what you're getting. Moral of the story is that LC is a very desirable car even at 100k.
Reply
Old May 18, 2017 | 08:38 PM
  #35  
missedapex's Avatar
missedapex
Thread Starter
Rookie
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 59
Likes: 18
From: CA
Default

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-spend-100-000

https://www.cars.com/reviews/2018-le...1420695302013/

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/lexus...t-test-review/


If the LC 500’s engine makes 471 peak horsepower at 7,100 rpm, has a reported 168-mph (electronically limited at the top of 5th gear) top-speed and ten (!) gears, one would hope/guess that those cogs’ ratios would be set rather close to one another to keep the engine on the boil—or at least first through fifth would be short, leaving sixth through 10th with mind-numbing fuel-sipping overdrive ratios. Part of this is true: seventh gear is 1:1, and gears eight-10 are indeed overdrive, but a tall (numerically small) 2.94:1 rear-differential ratio, conspire to take the kick out of what is potentially a spicy recipe. Even accelerating at wide-open throttle, gears one through four linger and pull for an inordinate amount of time. It sounds great, and there’s a definite surge of power as the tachometer sweeps over the 4,000 mark on its way to peak torque output at 4,800 rpm. So why not upshift into that sweet spot every time? Instead, redline upshifts into gears three-five occur downslope of the engine’s torque curve thereby missing out on the surge of torque.

Last edited by missedapex; May 18, 2017 at 09:08 PM.
Reply
Old May 19, 2017 | 12:18 PM
  #36  
Ahhadanny's Avatar
Ahhadanny
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 133
Likes: 15
From: Now/hereOR
Default

Originally Posted by missedapex
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-spend-100-000

https://www.cars.com/reviews/2018-le...1420695302013/

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/lexus...t-test-review/


If the LC 500’s engine makes 471 peak horsepower at 7,100 rpm, has a reported 168-mph (electronically limited at the top of 5th gear) top-speed and ten (!) gears, one would hope/guess that those cogs’ ratios would be set rather close to one another to keep the engine on the boil—or at least first through fifth would be short, leaving sixth through 10th with mind-numbing fuel-sipping overdrive ratios. Part of this is true: seventh gear is 1:1, and gears eight-10 are indeed overdrive, but a tall (numerically small) 2.94:1 rear-differential ratio, conspire to take the kick out of what is potentially a spicy recipe. Even accelerating at wide-open throttle, gears one through four linger and pull for an inordinate amount of time. It sounds great, and there’s a definite surge of power as the tachometer sweeps over the 4,000 mark on its way to peak torque output at 4,800 rpm. So why not upshift into that sweet spot every time? Instead, redline upshifts into gears three-five occur downslope of the engine’s torque curve thereby missing out on the surge of torque.
Because it is not defined as a performance car. It's a car to attract eyeballs and offer a smooth ride.
As my local dealer told me, the performance of LC is enough for a Lexus driver. And they don't expect to sell very many of them since you have lots of alternatives at the price 100k.
Reply
Old May 19, 2017 | 04:36 PM
  #37  
TimboIS's Avatar
TimboIS
Liquid Bra Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 145
From: ƒ(x)
Default

Originally Posted by Ahhadanny
Because it is not defined as a performance car. It's a car to attract eyeballs and offer a smooth ride.
As my local dealer told me, the performance of LC is enough for a Lexus driver. And they don't expect to sell very many of them since you have lots of alternatives at the price 100k.
I guess Oregon isn't the right market. My dealer has sold out their allocation for the year.
Reply
Old May 27, 2017 | 07:13 PM
  #38  
missedapex's Avatar
missedapex
Thread Starter
Rookie
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 59
Likes: 18
From: CA
Default

Well I just got back from a test drive and I will admit that the car does have some get up and go. It does not pull as hard as I had wished but it fees plenty quick enough after 20mph'ish. The back seats are a joke, my 14 year daughter could not sit behind my seat and had to sit behind the sales person on the passenger side. Net net, I put a deposit down for the next one that comes in with the performance package.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lzam
LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006)
37
Aug 29, 2018 09:31 PM
COOLIS
LS - 5th Gen (2018-present)
97
Jul 8, 2018 11:36 AM
BUSTN
LS - 4th Gen (2007-2017)
35
Oct 7, 2007 08:59 PM
StealthAWD
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
1
Mar 5, 2007 12:43 AM
Lvangundy
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
2
Jun 1, 2002 02:27 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:31 AM.