Notices
IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

Oh that’s the problem....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2019 | 05:09 AM
  #1  
Jwconeil's Avatar
Jwconeil
Thread Starter
Moderator
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 978
From: Indiana
Default Oh that’s the problem....

Some of you may have followed my attempts to resolve a P0159 code that has plagued my car. I thought it was related to not having cats, so I bought a tune. I would still get the code every 300-500 miles. I replaced my O2 sensor, replaced the exhaust gasket... still getting a code. I traced the O2 sensor wire, and all looked stock.

I checked with RR Racing, and they helped me figure it out. Apparently some of the older O2 simulators wired directly into the ECU. Look at this ugly mess...



Now I just need to figure out how to return this to stock. Any advice?

Major thanks to RR for helping me diagnose this 1.5 year problem, which I didn’t even pay them for. In return, I shall buy Penskes and their oil cooler. Their a great vendor that helped me out.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2019 | 05:46 AM
  #2  
Rickna's Avatar
Rickna
Pole Position
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 280
From: ConnectiTAX
Default

Wow, that's quite a mess. Since the the stock wires are color coded it shouldn't be that difficult to match them up. I would splice in 2"-3" pieces (to give working room), solder & heat shrink. I know some oppose soldering, however I've never had a problem.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2019 | 08:13 AM
  #3  
MileHIFcar's Avatar
MileHIFcar
Pole Position
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 408
From: Colorado
Default

Glad you figured it out! Usually when guys have had a similar issue it ended up being the O2 sims with prior vehicles that had headers before the tune was available through RR Racing. Bet you felt better after narrowing it down to the real issue.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2019 | 09:11 AM
  #4  
BirgeyT1's Avatar
BirgeyT1
Pole Position
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 372
Likes: 150
From: Texas
Default

I knew I was onto something when I suggested a conditioner being installed in your other thread
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2019 | 11:35 AM
  #5  
Rossi's Avatar
Rossi
Racer
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 238
From: Ca
Default

Looks like Sikky unit, you should be able to remove it and just re-connect the wires by their colors.
There should be few cut off wires that are not connected to anything.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2019 | 08:31 PM
  #6  
JWarr00's Avatar
JWarr00
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 30
Likes: 5
From: ON
Default

(Im)Patiently waiting to hear the results. Have had my F for a little over a month, went ~2000km worry free, and then threw a P0156 (O2, Bank 2 Sensor 2), have thrown it 4 times since then at intervals ranging from 50km to 600km. Has Sikky headers, if I read/researched correctly, last owner got the O2 simulator/conditioner from RR. Had the intake apart today to clean the throttle body, MAF, intake tube and cone filter, so also took off the driver-side shield/panel and opened the same fuse box, and found almost identical setup. Only difference was the style that the wiring was spliced in.

Before spotting this thread, next step was to go get the O2 sensor checked (might just do this anyway, my mechanic for the past 20 years told me he isn't interested in helping me maintain this car, so have to make a new friend/mechanic).

EDIT: Forgot to say setup sounds similar; Sikky headers, primary cat delete, Borla everything else.

Last edited by JWarr00; Sep 29, 2019 at 08:37 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2019 | 07:33 PM
  #7  
blackisF08's Avatar
blackisF08
Instructor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 821
Likes: 64
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by Jwconeil
Some of you may have followed my attempts to resolve a P0159 code that has plagued my car. I thought it was related to not having cats, so I bought a tune. I would still get the code every 300-500 miles. I replaced my O2 sensor, replaced the exhaust gasket... still getting a code. I traced the O2 sensor wire, and all looked stock.

I checked with RR Racing, and they helped me figure it out. Apparently some of the older O2 simulators wired directly into the ECU. Look at this ugly mess...



Now I just need to figure out how to return this to stock. Any advice?

Major thanks to RR for helping me diagnose this 1.5 year problem, which I didn’t even pay them for. In return, I shall buy Penskes and their oil cooler. Their a great vendor that helped me out.
thank god ppe came out with a plug and play one
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2019 | 07:29 PM
  #8  
lobuxracer's Avatar
lobuxracer
Tech Resource
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,081
Likes: 4,751
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by Rickna
Wow, that's quite a mess. Since the the stock wires are color coded it shouldn't be that difficult to match them up. I would splice in 2"-3" pieces (to give working room), solder & heat shrink. I know some oppose soldering, however I've never had a problem.
I worked on WC-135Bs in the Air Force. They were built with solder cup cannon plugs in the wiring harnesses. The wires would stress fracture underneath the insulation right where the flux ran up the wire when it was being tinned before being soldered into the plug. I will never ever solder a harness again. The Air Force spent $1.5B rewiring the entire 135 fleet because of this. I'd use bare crimp connectors with a decent tool (like a Daniels unit) and put shrink tubing over the joint if I intended to just put it back together. If I thought I might need to plug something in those wires at some point, I'd put a connector with crimped pins in and call it a day.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 06:01 AM
  #9  
Rickna's Avatar
Rickna
Pole Position
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 280
From: ConnectiTAX
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
I worked on WC-135Bs in the Air Force. They were built with solder cup cannon plugs in the wiring harnesses. The wires would stress fracture underneath the insulation right where the flux ran up the wire when it was being tinned before being soldered into the plug. I will never ever solder a harness again. The Air Force spent $1.5B rewiring the entire 135 fleet because of this. I'd use bare crimp connectors with a decent tool (like a Daniels unit) and put shrink tubing over the joint if I intended to just put it back together. If I thought I might need to plug something in those wires at some point, I'd put a connector with crimped pins in and call it a day.
I know you're anti solder, I understand and even agree with your reasons. However in 45 yrs I've never encountered a problem.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 09:03 AM
  #10  
Grosen84's Avatar
Grosen84
Rookie
5 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 94
Likes: 15
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
I worked on WC-135Bs in the Air Force. They were built with solder cup cannon plugs in the wiring harnesses. The wires would stress fracture underneath the insulation right where the flux ran up the wire when it was being tinned before being soldered into the plug. I will never ever solder a harness again. The Air Force spent $1.5B rewiring the entire 135 fleet because of this. I'd use bare crimp connectors with a decent tool (like a Daniels unit) and put shrink tubing over the joint if I intended to just put it back together. If I thought I might need to plug something in those wires at some point, I'd put a connector with crimped pins in and call it a day.
Got another tool suggestion that doesn't start at 300 dollars for the bare tool?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 11:07 AM
  #11  
Rickna's Avatar
Rickna
Pole Position
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 280
From: ConnectiTAX
Default

Originally Posted by Grosen84
Got another tool suggestion that doesn't start at 300 dollars for the bare tool?
That is big bux. I'm sure that if you shop around you could find a more reasonably priced tool. We're not working on an aircraft here, so MIL spec or top of the line is overkill IMO.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 12:11 PM
  #12  
WillAP1's Avatar
WillAP1
Intermediate
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 336
Likes: 118
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Grosen84
Got another tool suggestion that doesn't start at 300 dollars for the bare tool?
Originally Posted by Rickna
That is big bux. I'm sure that if you shop around you could find a more reasonably priced tool. We're not working on an aircraft here, so MIL spec or top of the line is overkill IMO.
Personally I hate all the normal crimp tools (though, admittedly I've never used a $300 one)... I never feel like I'm getting it tight enough. So I bought a hydraulic one from Harbor Freight for like $50 or $60. Works really well and gets super tight crimps. Its so powerful you can probably overdo it and damage some stuff so you just have to make sure you're using the correct die and take it slow.

I know a lot of people look down on the HF stuff but its served me well for all the hobby mechanic stuff I've done. Only broken a couple things and even then they will replace it in most instances.

Anyways, here is the one I have... obviously can be had cheaper if you use a coupon or wait for it to go on sale: https://www.harborfreight.com/hydrau...ool-66150.html

Last edited by WillAP1; Oct 3, 2019 at 12:15 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 02:38 PM
  #13  
Rickna's Avatar
Rickna
Pole Position
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 280
From: ConnectiTAX
Default

Originally Posted by WillAP1
Personally I hate all the normal crimp tools (though, admittedly I've never used a $300 one)... I never feel like I'm getting it tight enough. So I bought a hydraulic one from Harbor Freight for like $50 or $60. Works really well and gets super tight crimps. Its so powerful you can probably overdo it and damage some stuff so you just have to make sure you're using the correct die and take it slow.

I know a lot of people look down on the HF stuff but its served me well for all the hobby mechanic stuff I've done. Only broken a couple things and even then they will replace it in most instances.

Anyways, here is the one I have... obviously can be had cheaper if you use a coupon or wait for it to go on sale: https://www.harborfreight.com/hydrau...ool-66150.html
Could be a good tool, but not for the size wires we're talking about here.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 06:39 PM
  #14  
lobuxracer's Avatar
lobuxracer
Tech Resource
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,081
Likes: 4,751
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by Rickna
That is big bux. I'm sure that if you shop around you could find a more reasonably priced tool. We're not working on an aircraft here, so MIL spec or top of the line is overkill IMO.
Agreed. MIL Spec is overblown in most cases anyway. I'd shop around for a decent used head and buy new dies if I planned to do any significant wiring work. Otherwise, I just use bare metal butt connectors with a manual (very low cost) tool and put shrink wrap over when I am done. But I do everything possible to NOT cut wires in the first place. I hate having a hacked up harness, and truthfully it's one of the reasons I buy new cars. No surprise wiring crap from a previous owner who "put it back to stock" by twisting wires and wrapping with vinyl tape. That's way worse than soldering.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2019 | 06:47 AM
  #15  
Jwconeil's Avatar
Jwconeil
Thread Starter
Moderator
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 978
From: Indiana
Default

I’m with you guys on tool cost. Any idea what gauge those wires are? I’ll shop around for an affordable tool. I hate wiring and don’t ever cut wires. This and resisters for race seats are the only wiring mods I will do (and this is a repair).
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:24 AM.