Notices
IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

245/275 Tire Combo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2017 | 08:11 AM
  #31  
Lets Drive's Avatar
Lets Drive
Racer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 8
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by Schumi
I just received a response from Michelin in regards to the weight of the PS4S vs the PSS ... guess the improved tread wear and grip comes with a slight weight penalty.

"We show that the new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S tire design in size 245/35ZR19 weighs 24.28 LBS, compared to the Michelin Pilot Super Sport tire that weighs 23.18. Tire size 275/35ZR19 in the new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S weighs 26.90 LBS, compared to 25.82 LBS in the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S."
Interesting info. I have a set arriving today and the shipping weight for a pair of 255s is 48 lbs, while 285s come in at 56.10 lbs.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2017 | 09:34 AM
  #32  
flowrider's Avatar
flowrider
Lexus Champion
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,266
Likes: 2,395
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Schumi
I just received a response from Michelin in regards to the weight of the PS4S vs the PSS ... guess the improved tread wear and grip comes with a slight weight penalty.

"We show that the new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S tire design in size 245/35ZR19 weighs 24.28 LBS, compared to the Michelin Pilot Super Sport tire that weighs 23.18. Tire size 275/35ZR19 in the new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S weighs 26.90 LBS, compared to 25.82 LBS in the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S."
275/35/19 is not the correct size for the rear of the ISF. 275/30/19 is.

Lou
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2017 | 10:01 AM
  #33  
semnosNSX's Avatar
semnosNSX
Advanced
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 586
Likes: 60
From: California
Default

I think I'm getting ready to pick up a set of the PS4S very soon so I want to confirm the correct size that I want. I have stock 08' wheels and want a slightly wider tire, but I absolutely dont want a "bulged" look. Will the PS4S work in the 245/35/19 front, and 275/30/19 rear with no buldge? I know the PS2's fit, but wasn't sure about the PS4S.

thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2017 | 10:17 AM
  #34  
newgsman's Avatar
newgsman
Instructor
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 961
Likes: 120
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by flowrider
275/35/19 is not the correct size for the rear of the ISF. 275/30/19 is.

Lou
If we agree that 255/35/19 is the correct size then it is debatable whether 275/30/19 is more correct than 275/35/19. One size causes approx. 2% positive error while the other approx. 2% negative error. Ride height changes 1/4in either higher or lower for the chosen tire.

The 30 series tires:
give very slightly quicker acceleration.
have a bit harsher ride
speedometer will read faster than you are going
slightly better handling

The 35 series tire:
give you very slightly better gas mileage
have a bit softer ride
speedometer will read slower than your actual speed.
will fill the wheel well a bit better.

I have never tried either size but based on the above characteristics I am leaning toward the 275/35/19 tire when I get new ones.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2017 | 11:30 AM
  #35  
flowrider's Avatar
flowrider
Lexus Champion
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,266
Likes: 2,395
From: Arizona
Default

^^^^Your characteristics for the 35 series tire are wrong on points 1 and 4. How will it improve gas mileage? Because it's taller and heavier, the gas mileage should be a wee bit worse. 275/30/19 fit a 9" wheel just fine.

But your in Canada after all and your free to do as you wish.

Lou
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2017 | 12:51 PM
  #36  
MileHIFcar's Avatar
MileHIFcar
Pole Position
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 408
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by justfme
Those of you running 275/30 on the rears, do you get better traction when accelerating compared to the stock size?
Absolutely for me when paired with PSS's!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2017 | 03:14 AM
  #37  
Jz39's Avatar
Jz39
Advanced
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 740
Likes: 57
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by newgsman
If we agree that 255/35/19 is the correct size then it is debatable whether 275/30/19 is more correct than 275/35/19. One size causes approx. 2% positive error while the other approx. 2% negative error. Ride height changes 1/4in either higher or lower for the chosen tire.

The 30 series tires:
give very slightly quicker acceleration.
have a bit harsher ride
speedometer will read faster than you are going
slightly better handling

The 35 series tire:
give you very slightly better gas mileage
have a bit softer ride
speedometer will read slower than your actual speed.
will fill the wheel well a bit better.

I have never tried either size but based on the above characteristics I am leaning toward the 275/35/19 tire when I get new ones.

dont do it--it will look too tall. I've seen the 245/275 combo in person and it looks quite good.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2017 | 07:44 AM
  #38  
SoulFreak's Avatar
SoulFreak
Instructor
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 41
From: Florida
Default

I just got my car back from the dealership yesterday evening. I had some warranty work done and brand new set of tires installed. I went with MPSS 245/35/19 & 275/30/19 on stock 2011 wheels. What a difference! coming from stock sized Toyo Proxes 4 plus. I still want to get more seat time with these set of tires. So far they feel really good.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2017 | 02:01 PM
  #39  
3nergiz3d's Avatar
3nergiz3d
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 373
Likes: 53
From: Alberta
Default

I've had pretty good performance with 255/35/19 up front and 275/30/19 in the rear.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2017 | 08:03 PM
  #40  
MicahIS250's Avatar
MicahIS250
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 4
From: Washington
Default

I went 275/35/19 rear and 245/35/19 front. I'm quite happy with the results. Fills out the wheel wells very nicely, although now I wish there was a little less gap up front. In the end it is a very minimal difference as newgsman said it's only 2% but i'd rather have a little more sidewall personally.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2017 | 06:48 AM
  #41  
newgsman's Avatar
newgsman
Instructor
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 961
Likes: 120
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by MicahIS250
I went 275/35/19 rear and 245/35/19 front. I'm quite happy with the results. Fills out the wheel wells very nicely, although now I wish there was a little less gap up front. In the end it is a very minimal difference as newgsman said it's only 2% but i'd rather have a little more sidewall personally.
I was think of going with 245/40/19 for the front. That would be closer to 275/35/19 in terms of diameter. The front gap would also be a bit less than 245/35/19.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2017 | 03:29 PM
  #42  
MicahIS250's Avatar
MicahIS250
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 4
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by newgsman
I was think of going with 245/40/19 for the front. That would be closer to 275/35/19 in terms of diameter. The front gap would also be a bit less than 245/35/19.

I was thinking the same thing, but I wasn't sure if going with a taller tire up front would cause rubbing issues. Wish I would have given it a shot now as the rear is absolutely perfect with zero gap although I am going to need to roll my fenders, has me wanting to lower the front a bit to compensate but it doesn't look bad at all.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2017 | 05:03 PM
  #43  
Jz39's Avatar
Jz39
Advanced
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 740
Likes: 57
From: MD
Default

245/40 will look ridiculous. I went with a 235/40 against the advice of the forum members and they were right...it looked too tall and I ended up selling them and going back to stock size in front, even though I took a hit financially. I could literally feel the front of the car higher off the ground when driving. A 245/40 would be even worse.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2017 | 08:32 PM
  #44  
newgsman's Avatar
newgsman
Instructor
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 961
Likes: 120
From: Ontario
Default

If you went with 235/40/19 with 275/30/19 then for sure the fronts will look very tall because they will be almost half inch taller. You are right a 245/40/19 front will definitely look ridiculous with a 275/30/19 rear.

A 245/40/19 front tire however should not look so bad with a 275/35/19 rear given that they are both virtually the same diameter.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2017 | 03:30 AM
  #45  
Jz39's Avatar
Jz39
Advanced
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 740
Likes: 57
From: MD
Default

A 275/35 will only make the whole set up look even more ridiculous. The 235/40 looked bad INDEPENDNET of what the rear looked like. Now, having a 245/40 series in front and a 275/35 series rear will be a decision that you regret...it'll look like an SUV.

For the record, my rear is a 265/35 Porsche OEM tire with the same tread width as a 275 and this looks fine. But, having seen the 245/35 and 275/30 in person on 08-11 rims, this will be my next set up.

I know you may think that the small increase in tire diameter won't appear significant to the eye, but it will. And you can truly notice the difference in nod height even with the 235/40!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:33 PM.