Notices
IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

Weight Reduction ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 08:35 AM
  #16  
PaPaHoFF's Avatar
PaPaHoFF
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 1
From: Long Island
Default

Have you considered Lipo? This could be your biggest gain! lol jk
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 08:48 AM
  #17  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Understand we have a couple big issues here that will make weight reduction very expensive.
1. The IS is based off its bigger/heavier brother GS. When different cars share platforms the smaller cars are heavier than the competition as this is not a specific platform for them. Another example would be the G37 coupe which weighs a ridiculous amount.
2. The V-8 in the IS wasn't meant for the car and thats a big, heavy engine (thus the hood bulge etc).
3. Aftermarket CF is sometimes not any lighter than an aluminum or plastic part it is replacing. You really have to be clear on the weight of the CF piece.
4. Changing weight on a stock suspension may hurt the car as all the testing was done with the cars sold weight. Weight distribution changes and you may lose even more standing start dry traction. You really need some base data (track/strip) to see just how much improvement you get.

That said here are other suggestions
-New grill without the emblem may lose 1 lb
-No foglights
-Lighter glass than the OEM glass
-No spoiler
-Coilover system should be lighter than stock spring/shock setup
-Rip out carpet for flat floorplan or install thin material
-smaller sideview mirrors

FYI the M3 CSL we didn't get didn't have an A/C, radio...they were options....
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #18  
MRxSLAYx's Avatar
MRxSLAYx
Thread Starter
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Aventura, Florida
Default

Im glad the topic is getting some good attention.

This is some good weight savings and should help the car dramatically. A 197 weight loss from the reported 3780 would drop the car to around 3583 lbs.

That is great because the weight to power ratio would improve from 9.08 to 8.6. From what ive researched on the web, the weight to power ratio of the c63 is 8.85 because the actual curb weight of the car is 3993lbs.
Link Here: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do.../pageId=137110

Hopefully this statistic will put the isf ahead for now.
Originally Posted by anajri
ok good stuff
here it is. well by easy I ment simple bolt on or easy replacement did not mean by price at all.


ok so what to expect give or take a few LBS

easy savings

26.5 LBS Battery
6 LBS PTS exhaust
35 LBS spare jacks and tools
40 LBS light wheels
10 lbs cf fenders, hood and trunk
80 lbs Racing seats

197 LBS savings


hardest savings
27 lbs noise material stripping

224 lbs total savings not to bad exept for the last 30 lbs........

now it really sounds good. defenitly would be an inprovement in performance
Originally Posted by anajri
wow thankd for the info
every 100lbs should help about a .1sec in the 1/4... and being a drag racer at heart I'll take it. This together with the extra Hp should help overtake the M'S easier and maybe even things up with the C63 ( stock of course)

Alf
I Should have a run with one soon. Im definitely goning take out as much weight as possible and let you guys know how it goes.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 09:31 AM
  #19  
t0e's Avatar
t0e
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,494
Likes: 7
From: Cali4nication-LosAngeles
Default

Dont forget about the doors, they are super heavy...
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #20  
anajri's Avatar
anajri
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 175
Likes: 1
From: International
Default

Originally Posted by t0e
Dont forget about the doors, they are super heavy...

i was going more towards weight reduccion without the compromizing the cars interity or comodity
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 11:19 AM
  #21  
Damage's Avatar
Damage
Advanced
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 531
Likes: 6
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Understand we have a couple big issues here that will make weight reduction very expensive.
1. The IS is based off its bigger/heavier brother GS. When different cars share platforms the smaller cars are heavier than the competition as this is not a specific platform for them. Another example would be the G37 coupe which weighs a ridiculous amount.
2. The V-8 in the IS wasn't meant for the car and thats a big, heavy engine (thus the hood bulge etc).
3. Aftermarket CF is sometimes not any lighter than an aluminum or plastic part it is replacing. You really have to be clear on the weight of the CF piece.
4. Changing weight on a stock suspension may hurt the car as all the testing was done with the cars sold weight. Weight distribution changes and you may lose even more standing start dry traction. You really need some base data (track/strip) to see just how much improvement you get.

That said here are other suggestions
-New grill without the emblem may lose 1 lb
-No foglights
-Lighter glass than the OEM glass
-No spoiler
-Coilover system should be lighter than stock spring/shock setup
-Rip out carpet for flat floorplan or install thin material
-smaller sideview mirrors

FYI the M3 CSL we didn't get didn't have an A/C, radio...they were options....

This was good until your first suggestion:

"-New grill without the emblem may lose 1 lb"

ROFL. The emblem is probably chromed plastic which is probably under 10 ounces. Not exactly weighing your car down...


If money and comfort was not an issue and I want to lighten up the car as much as possible this would be my to-do list:

CF hood
CF fenders
CF bumpers
CF doors
CF roof
Take out rear seats
Take out carpeting
Take out all speakers and radio (I would leave radio and 2 speakers)
Take out spare & tools
Take out AC (I would leave this..)
Replace side and rear windows with Lexan (keep front for safety)
Lightweight batteries
Lightweight wheels
Install rollcage (for safety because of CF doors/roof)
Gut out the trunk
Lightweight seats.
Ti exhaust

Last edited by Damage; Jul 8, 2009 at 11:24 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 09:55 PM
  #22  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by Damage
This was good until your first suggestion:

"-New grill without the emblem may lose 1 lb"

ROFL. The emblem is probably chromed plastic which is probably under 10 ounces. Not exactly weighing your car down...


If money and comfort was not an issue and I want to lighten up the car as much as possible this would be my to-do list:

CF hood
CF fenders
CF bumpers
CF doors
CF roof
Take out rear seats
Take out carpeting
Take out all speakers and radio (I would leave radio and 2 speakers)
Take out spare & tools
Take out AC (I would leave this..)
Replace side and rear windows with Lexan (keep front for safety)
Lightweight batteries
Lightweight wheels
Install rollcage (for safety because of CF doors/roof)
Gut out the trunk
Lightweight seats.
Ti exhaust
Lexus grills tend to be made of very sturdy plastic and my thoughts are a lighter thinner grill would save a measly lbs
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 10:09 PM
  #23  
Supraman16's Avatar
Supraman16
Advanced
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 587
Likes: 42
From: Burbank, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Lexus grills tend to be made of very sturdy plastic and my thoughts are a lighter thinner grill would save a measly lbs
Very true...the OEM IS-F grill is pretty hefty. I would say at least 5 lbs or more. I know because I took mine off when I did my custom grill.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 04:43 AM
  #24  
mdsbrain's Avatar
mdsbrain
Lead Lap
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

I'm personally going on a diet. Cheapest weight savings there is :-)
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 08:28 AM
  #25  
lobuxracer's Avatar
lobuxracer
Tech Resource
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,049
Likes: 4,705
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by mdsbrain
I'm personally going on a diet. Cheapest weight savings there is :-)
I'm 15 lbs into a 60 lb weight reduction, but it doesn't do much for the car. Ideally we'd get it down to 3100 lbs so we could play tag with Vettes. I don't see getting 600 lbs off the car easily. The engine alone gives up 70 lbs to the Vette engine. I wish Toyota had gone with a plastic intake - the metal piece can't be light. Hmmm...
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 10:05 AM
  #26  
MRxSLAYx's Avatar
MRxSLAYx
Thread Starter
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Aventura, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
I'm 15 lbs into a 60 lb weight reduction, but it doesn't do much for the car. Ideally we'd get it down to 3100 lbs so we could play tag with Vettes. I don't see getting 600 lbs off the car easily. The engine alone gives up 70 lbs to the Vette engine. I wish Toyota had gone with a plastic intake - the metal piece can't be light. Hmmm...
A 3100 lbs ISF. That would be one amazing car, even with stock power.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 10:48 AM
  #27  
t0e's Avatar
t0e
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,494
Likes: 7
From: Cali4nication-LosAngeles
Default

^^^^ What dreams my come....
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #28  
Ekorre's Avatar
Ekorre
Rookie
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: HI
Default

so who has the lightest F now? Anyone weigh recently?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 09:11 PM
  #29  
trackdood's Avatar
trackdood
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

that would be me... hahah. just under 3600.. about 3585...
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 09:55 PM
  #30  
G Star's Avatar
G Star
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,973
Likes: 48
From: California
Default

If some of you are willing to lose the dual exhaust, most good titanium single exit systems only weight 11-15 lbs
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 PM.