FIRST REAL TEST between M3/C63/IS-F MotorTrend with NUMBERS
#1
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FIRST REAL TEST between M3/C63/IS-F MotorTrend with NUMBERS
#5
those number for the IS-F make me proud... does anyone else think that fuel economy for the 2G IS, including the IS-F, is outstanding? i mean how many 416 hp V8 engines offer 16/23?? heck in my IS 350 i average about 23.5 mpg with mixed city/hwy.. it seems like toyota hit the mark on fuel efficiency with the 2G IS..
#6
Lexus Test Driver
They state in the article that the NAV buttons come right out of the Prius. What are they talking about, I've sat in the Prius with the NAV and the buttons were different.
#7
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very good article. It covered all the points without getting too focused on personal tastes. The following are some of my thoughts.
BMW:
Personally, I love the way the new 4 door Bimmer looks (better than the 2 door coupe even) and as a package it seems to be the best of the three. Best profile exterior asthetics (shortest overhang and no exaggerated flared fenders), manual tranny, and a powerful engine WITH the lightest chassis of the 3.
BUT... take at look at the warranty coverage. Powertrain is 4 years and 50K miles - for a car of that price? BMW is obviously telling you something - that they don't even have faith in their product lasting into it's middle age. And that just about sums up BMW over the past few years. They'll make you pay to get power, but they can't guarantee you'll enjoy it reliably for years down the road.
IS-F:
I love the appearance of my is350 but I simply can't get past the enlarged and extended nose and the exaggerated flared fenders of the IS-F. I find it takes away a lot of the classyness and maturity of the regular chassis.
From a performance perspective I'm also not surprised the car understeers, putting such a large stagger on a front engined performance car (and one with a heavier engine compared to the is350) baffles me.
So what are they trying to accomplish with this car? Luxury and performance - the is350 pretty much does that. A powerful sports sedan - then why is there no manual option not a more balanced sophisticated suspension? Heck, they're still running steel control arms on the thing! Cars well under 1/2 that price have plenty of aluminum in the suspension.
From a cost point, I really don't know why they didn't create an is350R or something. Sunroof delete, manual option (you've got to incur crash tests costs for the IS-F anyway), and 200-300 lbs removed from the chassis. Add a little bit more tuning and 350 HP is certainly possible given the technology the engine has. Finally run mild flared fenders on the front only (handle 255 tires all round) and have a non-stagger setup for improved balance. Add a proper rear diff and aluminum control arms and you'd have a really sweet package and one deserving of a 'sport' title.
Benz:
Personally I find the C-class the best looking base sedan of the bunch. However, like the IS-F I really can't get past all the tacked on performance 'look'. Unfortunately, the power is a little too excessive and if you watched the Top Gear episode even the Stig found the power too agressive and actually upset the balance. Besides that, I was surprised to see the interior space comparable to the IS-F which is tiny (something that I like though).
BMW:
Personally, I love the way the new 4 door Bimmer looks (better than the 2 door coupe even) and as a package it seems to be the best of the three. Best profile exterior asthetics (shortest overhang and no exaggerated flared fenders), manual tranny, and a powerful engine WITH the lightest chassis of the 3.
BUT... take at look at the warranty coverage. Powertrain is 4 years and 50K miles - for a car of that price? BMW is obviously telling you something - that they don't even have faith in their product lasting into it's middle age. And that just about sums up BMW over the past few years. They'll make you pay to get power, but they can't guarantee you'll enjoy it reliably for years down the road.
IS-F:
I love the appearance of my is350 but I simply can't get past the enlarged and extended nose and the exaggerated flared fenders of the IS-F. I find it takes away a lot of the classyness and maturity of the regular chassis.
From a performance perspective I'm also not surprised the car understeers, putting such a large stagger on a front engined performance car (and one with a heavier engine compared to the is350) baffles me.
So what are they trying to accomplish with this car? Luxury and performance - the is350 pretty much does that. A powerful sports sedan - then why is there no manual option not a more balanced sophisticated suspension? Heck, they're still running steel control arms on the thing! Cars well under 1/2 that price have plenty of aluminum in the suspension.
From a cost point, I really don't know why they didn't create an is350R or something. Sunroof delete, manual option (you've got to incur crash tests costs for the IS-F anyway), and 200-300 lbs removed from the chassis. Add a little bit more tuning and 350 HP is certainly possible given the technology the engine has. Finally run mild flared fenders on the front only (handle 255 tires all round) and have a non-stagger setup for improved balance. Add a proper rear diff and aluminum control arms and you'd have a really sweet package and one deserving of a 'sport' title.
Benz:
Personally I find the C-class the best looking base sedan of the bunch. However, like the IS-F I really can't get past all the tacked on performance 'look'. Unfortunately, the power is a little too excessive and if you watched the Top Gear episode even the Stig found the power too agressive and actually upset the balance. Besides that, I was surprised to see the interior space comparable to the IS-F which is tiny (something that I like though).
Last edited by fritZman; 03-14-08 at 07:13 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Lexus Champion
1st Place
BMW M3
Speed, balance, and athleticism converge in today's best compact, high-performance sport sedan.
2nd Place
MERCEDES-BENZ C63 AMG
A solid, emotive machine that works as everyday transport-and accelerates like a first-gen Viper.
3rd Place
LEXUS IS F
Lexus's first effort in this category is a good one, lacking in only the finest of details.
BMW M3
Speed, balance, and athleticism converge in today's best compact, high-performance sport sedan.
2nd Place
MERCEDES-BENZ C63 AMG
A solid, emotive machine that works as everyday transport-and accelerates like a first-gen Viper.
3rd Place
LEXUS IS F
Lexus's first effort in this category is a good one, lacking in only the finest of details.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dmvp29
IS F (2008-2014)
9
08-10-12 09:55 PM