Notices
IS 500 (2022-2025) Conversations specifically about the 2022+ IS500 models.

IS 500 - CEL problem and update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 12:08 PM
  #46  
Sasnuke's Avatar
Sasnuke
Lexus Test Driver
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,260
Likes: 1,752
From: Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Z
DTC code P013A Bank 1 Sensor 2 - Which is a leak in the left side OR potential for a bad O2 sensor..

Joe Z
In looking at the code and possible causes (the 3 bullets), I'm struggling to think why an exhaust leak is even a possibility as a cause.
O2 sensors measure oxygen, nothing else, hence the name...more oxygen in the exhaust and the car is running Lean, less oxygen, it's running Rich.
If you have an exhaust leak near an O2 sensor, this may introduce more oxygen for the sensor to detect.
Far be it from me to call into question the brilliant minds that author the repair manual, but the code says "Slow Response - Rich to Lean"...if you introduced more oxygen into the exhaust, it should be the opposite "Slow Response - Lean to Rich".
And notice in the code description is states this occurs after fuel cut...during fuel cut the oxygen volume in the exhaust is even greater, so if you add an exhaust leak to that, the O2 sensor should be reading Lean like crazy.

For those that had the dealer replace the exhaust gasket and it didn't fix the issue...no kidding, I couldn't see why it would.
The vehicles that had the issue, based on the code description you should have been decelerating when the CEL came on.
Fuel cut most commonly occurs during deceleration. When accelerating and cruising with constant throttle you shouldn't be going into fuel cut.

I don't know, just my two cents. Maybe I'm completely out to lunch here.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 01:41 PM
  #47  
arentz07's Avatar
arentz07
Moderator
5 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 9,606
Likes: 4,788
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by Sasnuke
In looking at the code and possible causes (the 3 bullets), I'm struggling to think why an exhaust leak is even a possibility as a cause.
O2 sensors measure oxygen, nothing else, hence the name...more oxygen in the exhaust and the car is running Lean, less oxygen, it's running Rich.
If you have an exhaust leak near an O2 sensor, this may introduce more oxygen for the sensor to detect.
Far be it from me to call into question the brilliant minds that author the repair manual, but the code says "Slow Response - Rich to Lean"...if you introduced more oxygen into the exhaust, it should be the opposite "Slow Response - Lean to Rich".
And notice in the code description is states this occurs after fuel cut...during fuel cut the oxygen volume in the exhaust is even greater, so if you add an exhaust leak to that, the O2 sensor should be reading Lean like crazy.

For those that had the dealer replace the exhaust gasket and it didn't fix the issue...no kidding, I couldn't see why it would.
The vehicles that had the issue, based on the code description you should have been decelerating when the CEL came on.
Fuel cut most commonly occurs during deceleration. When accelerating and cruising with constant throttle you shouldn't be going into fuel cut.

I don't know, just my two cents. Maybe I'm completely out to lunch here.
I think what you are saying makes sense. As for the code name, I don't know what it means by "Rich to lean" - is that the expected behavior or the problem?

Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 01:45 PM
  #48  
95bat's Avatar
95bat
Pole Position
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 1,597
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Sasnuke
In looking at the code and possible causes (the 3 bullets), I'm struggling to think why an exhaust leak is even a possibility as a cause.
O2 sensors measure oxygen, nothing else, hence the name...more oxygen in the exhaust and the car is running Lean, less oxygen, it's running Rich.
If you have an exhaust leak near an O2 sensor, this may introduce more oxygen for the sensor to detect.
Far be it from me to call into question the brilliant minds that author the repair manual, but the code says "Slow Response - Rich to Lean"...if you introduced more oxygen into the exhaust, it should be the opposite "Slow Response - Lean to Rich".
And notice in the code description is states this occurs after fuel cut...during fuel cut the oxygen volume in the exhaust is even greater, so if you add an exhaust leak to that, the O2 sensor should be reading Lean like crazy.

For those that had the dealer replace the exhaust gasket and it didn't fix the issue...no kidding, I couldn't see why it would.
The vehicles that had the issue, based on the code description you should have been decelerating when the CEL came on.
Fuel cut most commonly occurs during deceleration. When accelerating and cruising with constant throttle you shouldn't be going into fuel cut.

I don't know, just my two cents. Maybe I'm completely out to lunch here.
More oxygen would give a lean reading, not a rich leaning. I think they have it right, rich to lean is more oxygen introduced. Going lean to rich would mean it's detecting more fuel.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 02:01 PM
  #49  
Sasnuke's Avatar
Sasnuke
Lexus Test Driver
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,260
Likes: 1,752
From: Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by arentz07
I think what you are saying makes sense. As for the code name, I don't know what it means by "Rich to lean" - is that the expected behavior or the problem?
The "Slow Response - Rich to Lean" means the sensor is taking longer than the ECU would expect to drop voltage after fuel cut. O2 sensors work on a scale of 0.1V (Max Lean) to 0.9 (Max Rich).
Rich to Lean is the expected behavior, but the Slow Response is the problem...it's taking too long to do the expected behavior.
Originally Posted by 95bat
More oxygen would give a lean reading, not a rich leaning. I think they have it right, rich to lean is more oxygen introduced. Going lean to rich would mean it's detecting more fuel.
You're correct that more oxygen is being introduced...the issue is the time that the sensor is taking to tell the ECU this information. The ECU is expecting an immediate change, but the sensor is taking it's sweet old time.
If you introduce more oxygen into the exhaust system then this would increase the time the sensor would take to move from a Lean to Rich reading...hence the alternate wording I suggested.
If you throw more oxygen at the sensor constantly it's never going to read Rich...but the ECU will also try to throw more fuel at the engine in an attempt to move the sensor reading. Eventually the ECU give up and throw a code that something is wrong.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 02:03 PM
  #50  
jg13219's Avatar
jg13219
8th Gear
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 8
Likes: 9
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Z
Yes unfortunately they (Lexus USA) are on a guided track… See my post# 18 & 31 in this thread..

The gaskets and flange alignment are the first inexpensive attempts… If there are bad O2 issues, that’s where it will become more costly for the warranty fixes..

Last but not least it can also be a software issue if the physical parts do not resolve the issue permanently..

Hoping they get to the bottom of this soon..


Joe Z
Thanks, Joe Z. Yeah, really hoping this gasket replacement will resolve my issue but I guess only time will tell. It was love at first sight with the car so I'm remaining optimistic that Lexus gets to the bottom of this.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 02:48 PM
  #51  
nmdjr's Avatar
nmdjr
Rookie
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 75
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by Sasnuke
Given the way this O2 Sensor code issue is trending i think the dealer tech that mentioned this fix will need to be done to all IS500 is probably spot on.
I think we can safety say a Service Bulletin is gonna be a minimum, if not an actual recall.
As this is emission related, I think the recall will come.
If NTHSA gets involved, then for sure it's gonna be a recall.
I believe Canada has better laws than the US in regards to recalls, I read somewhere that an issue has to be life-threatening for it to be a recall in the US. Just like the 2GR-FE engine on our Lexus/Toyota where the vvti and oil cooler rubber line would burst and leak engine oil which can ruin the engine. This was a TSB in the US but a recall in Canada.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 05:12 PM
  #52  
cbroccoli's Avatar
cbroccoli
Rookie
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 29
Likes: 57
From: PA
Default

I got my check engine light today. Around 100 miles on the car. Dropped it off at the dealership this evening and was told someone would be in touch tomorrow. Pretty ****ing annoyed. One of the biggest justifications for buying this car was Lexus reliability and here we are. I’ve owned multiple German cars and never had issues this early into ownership.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 06:00 PM
  #53  
AJinDFW's Avatar
AJinDFW
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 128
Likes: 207
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by cbroccoli
I got my check engine light today. Around 100 miles on the car. Dropped it off at the dealership this evening and was told someone would be in touch tomorrow. Pretty ****ing annoyed. One of the biggest justifications for buying this car was Lexus reliability and here we are. I’ve owned multiple German cars and never had issues this early into ownership.
Sorry to read this. Hope the fix is simple.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 06:54 PM
  #54  
macmaster's Avatar
macmaster
Pole Position
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 1,985
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by cbroccoli
I got my check engine light today. Around 100 miles on the car. Dropped it off at the dealership this evening and was told someone would be in touch tomorrow. Pretty ****ing annoyed. One of the biggest justifications for buying this car was Lexus reliability and here we are. I’ve owned multiple German cars and never had issues this early into ownership.
I felt the same way. In fact, you simply cannot say that the IS500 is reliable at this point. Think about this: I will never be able to tell people, “I’ve NEVER had a problem with this car.” It’s a shame. These engines might be “bulletproof,” but the electronics and car as a whole are not immune to issues more than any other car manufacturer.

But go ahead people. Keep buying them and putting on your PPF and ceramic before you know if you have a lemon or not.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 06:56 PM
  #55  
zman21's Avatar
zman21
Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 90
Likes: 124
From: AL
Default

I have 70 miles or so since Sunday. I'm going to to call the dealer and ask them to expect me soon and order the gasket/sensor now so I don't have to wait around.

Think they'll tell me to pound sand?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 06:57 PM
  #56  
macmaster's Avatar
macmaster
Pole Position
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 1,985
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by zman21
I have 70 miles or so since Sunday. I'm going to to call the dealer and ask them to expect me soon and order the gasket/sensor now so I don't have to wait around.

Think they'll tell me to pound sand?
have you been on the freeway yet?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 06:59 PM
  #57  
zman21's Avatar
zman21
Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 90
Likes: 124
From: AL
Default

Originally Posted by macmaster
have you been on the freeway yet?
Yep, prob 8 miles or so. Another 10 tomorrow. Nothing yet.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 07:04 PM
  #58  
macmaster's Avatar
macmaster
Pole Position
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 1,985
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by zman21
Yep, prob 8 miles or so. Another 10 tomorrow. Nothing yet.
If you get the chance, try slowing or braking from about 70 to 50 on a curve/on ramp. That might trigger it.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 07:20 PM
  #59  
zman21's Avatar
zman21
Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 90
Likes: 124
From: AL
Default

Originally Posted by macmaster
If you get the chance, try slowing or braking from about 70 to 50 on a curve/on ramp. That might trigger it.
Will do. That's something I haven't done yet is get into the brakes much.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2022 | 07:56 PM
  #60  
TipsyTonio's Avatar
TipsyTonio
Racer
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 2,331
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by macmaster
I felt the same way. In fact, you simply cannot say that the IS500 is reliable at this point. Think about this: I will never be able to tell people, “I’ve NEVER had a problem with this car.” It’s a shame. These engines might be “bulletproof,” but the electronics and car as a whole are not immune to issues more than any other car manufacturer.

But go ahead people. Keep buying them and putting on your PPF and ceramic before you know if you have a lemon or not.
Seems a bit pessimistic….

Last edited by TipsyTonio; Jan 26, 2022 at 08:41 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:26 AM.