When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I had them in my young kid days. but i would not recommend one as it wouldn't do anything for you.
if anything i would get a high quality front and call it a day.
I had them in my young kid days. but i would not recommend one as it wouldn't do anything for you.
if anything i would get a high quality front and call it a day.
I've seen them in the new Acuras, it looks good to me haha
I dont understand the fixation on "looks good". I feel like if it works good that is what I want. Looks isnt worth spendinng money on if it cant be seen. But if it makes the handling better thats wortth money.
I dont understand the fixation on "looks good". I feel like if it works good that is what I want. Looks isnt worth spendinng money on if it cant be seen. But if it makes the handling better thats wortth money.
People spend $550 on a tune that provides no proven horsepower increase on this car except the fact that the redline is raised to 7200 RPM and a number of vehicles getting stuck in limp mode.
Point is, this car isn't mod friendly, anything you do to it isn't going to drastically change anything. One could argue that car enthusiast actually spend more money on car aesthetics than engine modifications. It's much easier to buy wheels, lip kit, and springs rather than modifying engine components and making the car unreliable. I don't really understand the point of your post, honestly