Notices
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

3.6mpg help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 05:37 PM
  #31  
Raralith's Avatar
Raralith
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Acingteam
^ I'm sure that's your butt dyno talking. You won't really notice a 20-30whp difference in a car (especially of this weight)... and I'm sure you didn't gain anything close to that with just an intake.
You will notice 20-30whp, and that's a huge gain for the IS 350. I'm probably only getting 10-15whp more from intake and full catback exhaust, and my times on the drag strip definately improved even factoring in the environment. But, 20-30 whp from an intake though, not likely.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 05:42 PM
  #32  
BlkSapPrl7's Avatar
BlkSapPrl7
Driver
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: IN
Default

your 350 has 12 injectors that fires on cold start.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 05:44 PM
  #33  
Acingteam's Avatar
Acingteam
Intermediate
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 1
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Raralith
You will notice 20-30whp, and that's a huge gain for the IS 350. I'm probably only getting 10-15whp more from intake and full catback exhaust, and my times on the drag strip definately improved even factoring in the environment. But, 20-30 whp from an intake though, not likely.
I disagree. Will you see results? Yes (minimal). Will you actually feel it? Unlikely.

When I had my WRX, mind you the car weighs about 700lbs less, I had the car tuned and jumped 25whp on a Mustang Dyno. I couldn't tell the difference in power. I went from 254whp to 279whp... the car felt more responsive, but that was because of a tune.

Either way the intake would not be a "night and day" difference.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 09:06 PM
  #34  
IS350rock's Avatar
IS350rock
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: wa
Default

Originally Posted by Acingteam
I disagree. Will you see results? Yes (minimal). Will you actually feel it? Unlikely.

When I had my WRX, mind you the car weighs about 700lbs less, I had the car tuned and jumped 25whp on a Mustang Dyno. I couldn't tell the difference in power. I went from 254whp to 279whp... the car felt more responsive, but that was because of a tune.

Either way the intake would not be a "night and day" difference.
On my intake I notice a huge dirence in my acceleration
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 05:45 AM
  #35  
Kurtz's Avatar
Kurtz
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 14
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by IS350rock
On my intake I notice a huge dirence in my acceleration
You really don't.

You imagine one, but it's just your imagination.

If you actually measured your acceleration times you'd see no significant difference.

An intake, by itself, won't provide more than about 5 rwhp.

Which is not noticable at all, let alone a "huge difference"

The electronic snake oil I mention might give you another 5-10 until the ECU tunes it back out... which again won't amount to a "huge difference"

Short ram intakes such as yours can add a huge amount of noise though- and many people confuse that with horsepower.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 06:02 AM
  #36  
heyarms's Avatar
heyarms
Pole Position
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 40
From: SoTX
Default

Can i go ahead and ask? How old are you, IS350Rock? How much experience with cars do you have?

And really, take the best advice given by the forum and remove your intake to try and resolve your problem. Even the "imaginary huge gains" your intake gives, i doubt is worth 3.6mpg.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 10:53 AM
  #37  
isthrizzy's Avatar
isthrizzy
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 677
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

OP - are you refilling your tank after driving 40-50 miles? B/C that's what would have to happen if you got 3.5 mpg. If that's the case, revert back to your stock intake set up and see if that resolves the problem. If not, then maybe you need to bring it to the dealer (with stock set up in place) and have them evaluate things.

I find it hard to believe you get 3.5 mph and there is no engine warning light, etc. B/C with that crappy of mileage there would certainly have to be something wrong with the car.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #38  
sjgIS350's Avatar
sjgIS350
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 734
Likes: 1
From: WA
Default I think we need a math lesson too.

I really don't understand the gibberish in the original post.

It sound to me that the car has a non-stock intake and the displayed mpg (current and or tank) is fluctuating greatly.

So...lets find out what your actual MPG is.

1) fill tank
2) reset one of the trip odometers
3) drive the car normally until you are just about empty
4) fill tank again.
5) take note of how many gallons it takes
6)Check the miles on the trip odometer you reset in step 2)
7)Divide (this is the math part) the miles from step by the gallons in step 5. MPG = Miles/gallons

What is the answer? Somewhere around 20?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 06:10 PM
  #39  
juice14's Avatar
juice14
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 2
From: Ga
Default

I got more than that at the track, thats crazy... like some have said.. just try driving a whole tank and look at the tank avg. city you should get at least 16 and hwy you should get low to mid 20s considering you dirve pretty agressive
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
metaleckz
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
23
Jun 23, 2014 02:47 PM
Shervin021
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
59
Feb 10, 2012 09:28 PM
718murdoc
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
44
Apr 18, 2011 11:02 PM
SocalSo350
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
39
May 20, 2008 02:33 PM
wjimmy
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
31
May 20, 2007 09:57 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:41 PM.