Notices
GX - 3rd Gen (2024-present) Discussion topics related to the 2024+ GX550 models

17 MPG dont make sense

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2023 | 08:52 PM
  #1  
jironman's Avatar
jironman
Thread Starter
Driver
Photogenic
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 50
Likes: 34
From: Canada
Default 17 MPG dont make sense

Lexus said GX 550 gets 17 MPG, but it dosent make sense. The LX 600 uses same engine with higher 409 HP gets 17/22, 19 MPG combined, the GX has detuned 349HP, but only gets 17 MPG? Anyone know whats going on?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2023 | 05:06 AM
  #2  
jer's Avatar
jer
Pole Position
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 149
From: fl
Default

The GX even though boxy, is also lighter so I agree with you. I was thinking it's combined mileage would be at least 20-21 mpg, even though the engine is detuned.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2023 | 07:24 AM
  #3  
NickL's Avatar
NickL
Pole Position
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 939
From: MA
Default

Didn’t they say production vehicle is subject to change?
I think 19MPG combine on the LX600 is a little stretch.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2023 | 08:25 AM
  #4  
Slprciv's Avatar
Slprciv
Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 58
Likes: 23
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by NickL
Didn’t they say production vehicle is subject to change?
I think 19MPG combine on the LX600 is a little stretch.
Exactly it's not in production yet. Calm down people.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2023 | 09:05 AM
  #5  
jironman's Avatar
jironman
Thread Starter
Driver
Photogenic
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 50
Likes: 34
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by jer
The GX even though boxy, is also lighter so I agree with you. I was thinking it's combined mileage would be at least 20-21 mpg, even though the engine is detuned.
my thoughts exactly.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2023 | 10:03 AM
  #6  
jironman's Avatar
jironman
Thread Starter
Driver
Photogenic
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 50
Likes: 34
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by NickL
Didn’t they say production vehicle is subject to change?
I think 19MPG combine on the LX600 is a little stretch.
https://www.lexus.com/newGX scroll all the way down to "press release". It's kinda official if you ask me. On Canadian lexus.ca website it also posted 13.8L/100km which is 17MPG. Anyway, thanks for your reply. I hope it's better than 17MPG

Last edited by jironman; Dec 8, 2023 at 10:13 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2023 | 11:42 AM
  #7  
skrypj's Avatar
skrypj
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 282
Likes: 130
From: UT
Default

Detuning the engine doesn't make it more efficient. Thats not how it works. The torque curves on the two motors are 100% artificially set within the PCM and the HP difference is a matter of changing a few numbers in the tuning. The only time the GX engine would use less fuel is if both are at WOT and the LX is using all of that 409 hp while the GX is limited to 349. The engines are physically the same and will operate the same when producing the same power/torque.

Take a look at the Tundra. They don't differentiate between the detuned SR trim with 358hp/406 tq and the SR5 and higher trims with 389hp/479tq because its all in the tuning. If both engines are producing 200 ft-lbs or torque at 2000 rpm, they will both be operating exactly the same and using the same amount of fuel.

EPA tests arn't running the trucks at WOT.

Last edited by skrypj; Dec 8, 2023 at 11:50 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2023 | 11:58 AM
  #8  
skrypj's Avatar
skrypj
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 282
Likes: 130
From: UT
Default

Also I wonder if the 17 mpg combined is for the Overtrail with 33" all terrains and they are just broadly applying the same MPG across the board.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2023 | 01:20 PM
  #9  
jironman's Avatar
jironman
Thread Starter
Driver
Photogenic
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 50
Likes: 34
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by skrypj
Also I wonder if the 17 mpg combined is for the Overtrail with 33" all terrains and they are just broadly applying the same MPG across the board.

that’s definitely a possibility.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 07:57 AM
  #10  
CJH137's Avatar
CJH137
1st Gear
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: SK
Default

Originally Posted by skrypj
Detuning the engine doesn't make it more efficient. Thats not how it works. The torque curves on the two motors are 100% artificially set within the PCM and the HP difference is a matter of changing a few numbers in the tuning. The only time the GX engine would use less fuel is if both are at WOT and the LX is using all of that 409 hp while the GX is limited to 349. The engines are physically the same and will operate the same when producing the same power/torque.

Take a look at the Tundra. They don't differentiate between the detuned SR trim with 358hp/406 tq and the SR5 and higher trims with 389hp/479tq because its all in the tuning. If both engines are producing 200 ft-lbs or torque at 2000 rpm, they will both be operating exactly the same and using the same amount of fuel.

EPA tests arn't running the trucks at WOT.

New to Lexus, so excuse me for ignorance. If the mech is the same on the LX / GX, is it possible to load the LX fuel/air map into the GX and safely drive around with 409 hp?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2024 | 07:36 PM
  #11  
free888's Avatar
free888
Rookie
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 40
Likes: 23
From: PA
Default

One of the reviewers on YT(Toyota Jeff), flipped through the handouts they gave the reviewers in Tucson in preparation for the Feb 1 driving reveals. All of the spec sheets said 15/21/17 for MPG, so average fuel economy is 17 MPG regardless of trim.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2024 | 02:00 PM
  #12  
tsslaporte's Avatar
tsslaporte
Pit Crew
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 174
Likes: 4
From: West Palm Beach
Default

5 degrees better approach than previous GX - this hurts MPG
smaller turbos so they spool faster for off-road response - this hurts MPG.

It's clear they balanced compromises well to still obtain better MPG than previous GX.

Reply
Old Feb 1, 2024 | 09:17 PM
  #13  
AJT123's Avatar
AJT123
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 17,087
Likes: 514
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Real world MPG won't be any better.

That's sure a healthy torque figure though, for sure.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2024 | 04:46 PM
  #14  
jlficken's Avatar
jlficken
Intermediate
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 489
Likes: 226
From: NE
Default

Originally Posted by tsslaporte;[url=tel:11661344
11661344[/url]]5 degrees better approach than previous GX - this hurts MPG
smaller turbos so they spool faster for off-road response - this hurts MPG.

It's clear they balanced compromises well to still obtain better MPG than previous GX.
I’ve never averaged under 18mpg on my 2022 GX at 1900ft ASL event though I have a full set of BudBuilt 3/16” stainless skid plates and OEM size Falken Rubitrek’s installed.

Most of the time I’m in the 20-21mpg range.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2024 | 12:03 AM
  #15  
703's Avatar
703
Lead Lap
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 935
Default

There might be a 3.5 V6 Hybrid in the mix.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:29 AM.