GX - 2nd Gen (2010-2023) Discussion topics related to the 2010 + GX460 models

How bad is non-ML Audio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2019 | 07:18 PM
  #1  
oksir83's Avatar
oksir83
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 155
Likes: 48
From: AL
Default How bad is non-ML Audio?

I am currently looking for a used GX460 and in my price point (and desired number of miles), I don't think the Luxury package is an option without sacrificing mileage.

I will be coming from a Benz w/ Harmon Kardon and also a Jeep SRT with HK. Just how does the non-ML audio stack up to the ML audio and against other premium audio options from other car makers?

I fear that I am focusing too much on the audio and letting some good deals slip by on Base or Premium models. I saw where someone upgraded just the speakers and said it seemed to make a noticeable difference with the stock system. I am not an audiophile by any means, but I do like my music when driving around.
Old Feb 5, 2019 | 09:09 PM
  #2  
ThomasGS4's Avatar
ThomasGS4
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,583
Likes: 452
From: TX
Default

I personally feel that it sounds better than the ML (in the GX, that is.)
Old Feb 5, 2019 | 09:42 PM
  #3  
ASE's Avatar
ASE
Pole Position
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 1,461
From: WA
Default

Maybe not totally apples-to-apples ... had a 2008 GX470 with ML System and just bought a 2019 GX460 Premium. IMHO the latter has better sound. Also, I am not a fan of the adjustable suspension system ... on "Comfort" it handled like a barge and on "Sport" was almost but not quite acceptable. I disabled the system and installed Bilstein Shocks ... a HUGE improvement in steering response, handling, reduced body roll and overall sense of control, with a smooth ride and the right amount of road feedback. The GX460 Premium does not have this overpriced and sub-performing feature ... so for both reasons, IMHO the up-charge for the Luxury is absolutely not worth the money.
Old Feb 6, 2019 | 09:24 AM
  #4  
Romanova's Avatar
Romanova
Racer
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 820
From: TX
Default

The non ML is going to be easier to upgrade, speaker wise. The ML speakers usually have a crazy ohm rating so replacing with aftermarket speakers is difficult if not impossible.
Old Feb 6, 2019 | 01:45 PM
  #5  
situman's Avatar
situman
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,918
Likes: 305
From: NY
Default

I have no issues with my non-ML GX Premium. Just adjust the sound settings a bit to your taste.
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 11:21 AM
  #6  
Toothpick's Avatar
Toothpick
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 17
Likes: 3
From: Ct
Default

Non ML unit with upgraded speakers is better then ML. Just set aside $300 for a speakers upgrade.
HK definitely not a sound quality benchmark.
So you will be happy either way.
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 12:49 PM
  #7  
bd5400's Avatar
bd5400
Pole Position
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 239
Likes: 37
From: Wisconsin
Default

Having the ML system was a priority for me and I wouldn't have bought one without it, but I'd also keep in mind that the ML system in the GX is not a top tier system. It's a mid-range system that's going to be good, but isn't going to blow anyone away. Lexus reserves the top tier ML system (ML-Reference) for higher models such as the LX.
Old Feb 12, 2019 | 02:38 PM
  #8  
BradTank's Avatar
BradTank
Racer
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 250
From: AZ
Default

Mark Levinson systems are such a scam, after having two previous Lexus with that "upgraded" package, I went out of my way to not pay for that option on this model GX.

The speakers on my previous LS basically crumbled into dust. I'm not exaggerating when I say the speakers were like some generic brand from Walmart. But for replacement, it was basically "dealer only" as they had a weird rating. If you put in an "off teh shelf" speaker it could blow the incredibly expensive Levinson amp.The forum was full of the same types of complaints, also people having to have the subwoofer replaced, the amp replaced, etc. On my previous gen GX, also had a lot of issues. I think I ended up having to turn the bass way down from normal so it wouldn't have that rattling, broken sub sound.

And even when they weren't broken, the sound quality was just like any car. In fact, i was blown away when I had a Mustang as a rental car and couldn't believe how much better the sound quality was compared to my Lexus with a Mark Levinson system that added like $2,000 to the price of the car.

Last edited by BradTank; Feb 12, 2019 at 02:49 PM.
Old Feb 13, 2019 | 04:56 AM
  #9  
Madtiger's Avatar
Madtiger
Rookie
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 73
Likes: 12
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by Toothpick
Non ML unit with upgraded speakers is better then ML. Just set aside $300 for a speakers upgrade.
HK definitely not a sound quality benchmark.
So you will be happy either way.
Good luck getting to ML level with just $300 of speaker upgrade to the base system! LOL
Old Feb 13, 2019 | 04:57 AM
  #10  
Madtiger's Avatar
Madtiger
Rookie
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 73
Likes: 12
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by BradTank
Mark Levinson systems are such a scam, after having two previous Lexus with that "upgraded" package, I went out of my way to not pay for that option on this model GX.

The speakers on my previous LS basically crumbled into dust. I'm not exaggerating when I say the speakers were like some generic brand from Walmart. But for replacement, it was basically "dealer only" as they had a weird rating. If you put in an "off teh shelf" speaker it could blow the incredibly expensive Levinson amp.The forum was full of the same types of complaints, also people having to have the subwoofer replaced, the amp replaced, etc. On my previous gen GX, also had a lot of issues. I think I ended up having to turn the bass way down from normal so it wouldn't have that rattling, broken sub sound.

And even when they weren't broken, the sound quality was just like any car. In fact, i was blown away when I had a Mustang as a rental car and couldn't believe how much better the sound quality was compared to my Lexus with a Mark Levinson system that added like $2,000 to the price of the car.


ML system in the GX is a $1145 option. Remember that it is the whole system makeover (from headunit to amp/DSP to speakers)...not just adding onto the existing (base) system. So, if you were to tear out the base system and make a new aftermarket system, then can you make a good system with $1145? That would include maybe a new head unit, amplifiers (need 2 probably, one for speakers and one for subwoofer), speakers, subwoofer, wiring, enclosures, AND labor unless you can do everything yourself. I was into aftermarket stuff in my younger years...$1145 is not a lot of money when you factor in those things.

Last edited by Madtiger; Feb 13, 2019 at 06:02 AM.
Old Jul 19, 2019 | 05:23 AM
  #11  
Chasin's Avatar
Chasin
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 210
Likes: 79
From: CA
Default

Sorry to bump this older thread. I am in the same situation as the OP. Is Levinson worth it? Can anyone else with experience with both ML vs non-ML comment?
Old Jul 19, 2019 | 07:13 AM
  #12  
nsaldanh's Avatar
nsaldanh
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 611
Likes: 91
From: FL
Default

I've had two different GX 460s, one with ML and one without. I don't think the ML was any better than the non ML. Also the ML on the GX is not as good as the one on the LS.
Old Jul 19, 2019 | 07:33 AM
  #13  
Chasin's Avatar
Chasin
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 210
Likes: 79
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by nsaldanh
I've had two different GX 460s, one with ML and one without. I don't think the ML was any better than the non ML. Also the ML on the GX is not as good as the one on the LS.
Thanks for the response. Its much easier to find Premium models vs Luxury models too, so it helps widen my search.
Old Jul 19, 2019 | 08:26 AM
  #14  
tuandino's Avatar
tuandino
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 232
Likes: 66
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by Chasin
Sorry to bump this older thread. I am in the same situation as the OP. Is Levinson worth it? Can anyone else with experience with both ML vs non-ML comment?
I've owned both GX with and without ML audio. Personally, I would prefer the ML audio for its clarity and better overall sound. But then again, sound is a very subjective matter and wholly depends on your listening taste.
Old Jul 19, 2019 | 09:16 AM
  #15  
TRD_Power's Avatar
TRD_Power
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 78
From: Crappy ol' Texas
Default

My GS460's ML system blows the non-ML system away in my mom's '18 GX. Also, my wife's Cayenne has the upgraded Bose system, and that sounds awful in comparison. Never did understand the disgust for ML that some people have, but I think it's pretty good overall. Haven't heard it in the GX, however, so I'll keep quiet in that regard.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 AM.