GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011) Discussion about the 2006+ model GS300, GS350, GS430, GS450H and GS460

Engine Comparison: LS460 vs. GS460 w/ engine cover off - Pictures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-09, 11:48 AM
  #31  
GS2006
Lead Lap
 
GS2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maj75
What we need is to have a LS460 and GS460 strapped to the same dyno and see what is really there. Manufacturers in the 70s intentionally underated HP on cars for insurance purposes. Maybe Lexus did not want the GS460 to outshine their GS450h?

Maybe the power is there and we don't know it
I agree.
I have driven both LS and GS. Totally different. The GS is more responsive and any electric car is going to have more bang at the line.

As for the GS 460, there seems to be a little something odd with the car at certain rpms. A little vibration type of thing. That is not there on the GS430. Not sure I like the eight speed trans in the GS460.. I came from the muscle car too and I stuck my noise up sports with an auto trans until I drove the GS. I’m not a fan of automatics, but this one won me over.
Old 04-29-09, 12:00 PM
  #32  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Someone swap the GS intake over to the LS and see what kind of power drop you get

Then again, we dont know the difference in timing/AFR, if there are any between the GS and LS.
Old 04-29-09, 12:48 PM
  #33  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,667
Received 185 Likes on 144 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maj75
I don't doubt you.

The investigation has to start with someone who has access to Lexus part numbers. Are the heads, cams, valves, exhaust manifold the same, LS/GS460? I can't imagine that the LS would have a more free-flowing exhaust, but anything is possible I guess. I'll bet that the LS intake system is more about eliminating intake noise than performance. After all, the IS-F is similar to the GS460 design and it manages to extract 416 HP.
you can't remotely compare the is-f engine to gs460 engine. 5L, intake difference, ecu / timing / throttle all different
The following users liked this post:
Leximum (05-27-23)
Old 04-29-09, 02:41 PM
  #34  
maj75
Driver
 
maj75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lighthouse Point, FL
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I meant that the intake runner was similar in design to the IS-F, not that the motors were similar. If a single intake tract can feed the IS-F's 400+ HP, it should not restrict the GS460.
Old 06-01-09, 10:40 AM
  #35  
JBrady
Lexus Champion
 
JBrady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,124
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Ok, old post but...

The dual intake on the LS looks very good to me.

The GS originally had the 300hp 3UZ-FE which most likely had the 1.97" dual pipe exhaust. Looks like Lexus transplanted the 1UR-FSE while keeping at least the 3UZ intake system and probably the UZ exhaust as well. The UR is physically larger than the UZ and that probably required different exhaust manifolds as well.

The intake and exhaust mods required to fit the engine would probably have come with some durability testing. High RPM high power testing with restrictive exhaust could have shown a need to limit power further than the restrictions alone would dictate. This could be done fairly easily with factory tuning mods.

All of the above is educated guessing but reasonable based on the observable and measurable power differences.

Cures? If my guess on the exhaust manifolds is correct it could be tough to change that. S&S did some testing with the 5.7 trucks and found the ECU to be VERY intolerant of manifold changes. Providing a better intake (if in fact better, not just louder or "fancier") is always a good idea. I gained 5rwhp (track measured) with just a cold air mod to my stock LS400. 10rwhp gain is very reasonable on this larger engine. A properly engineered exhaust (after the manifolds) may be good for 10rwhp more. So, halfway there but probably not cost effective.
Old 06-07-16, 04:39 PM
  #36  
703
Lead Lap
 
703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,637
Received 762 Likes on 512 Posts
Default

The GS 460 has a 10.5:1 compression ratio. The LS 460 has a 11.8:1 compression ratio.

This is where the power deficit comes from. Not from intakes or exhausts.
Old 11-06-19, 09:37 PM
  #37  
Kytb0405
Driver School Candidate
 
Kytb0405's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: TX
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 1UR-FSE has direct injection.

At least in the US all the Japanese built 1UR-FSE have direct injection. To see if yours has it look for the mechanical direct injection fuel pump on the back of the head on the driver's side. These are for high pressure fuel delivery that is run by the camshaft. These only come on direct injection engines.
Old 12-10-19, 08:20 AM
  #38  
K272BB199
Driver School Candidate
 
K272BB199's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: PA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If 1UR-FE is based on 1UR-FSE, can I take 1UR-FSE heads and put it on Lexus GX 460 (1UR-FE).

Can I turn 1UR-FE into 1UR-FSE?
Old 12-10-19, 05:30 PM
  #39  
Kytb0405
Driver School Candidate
 
Kytb0405's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: TX
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by K272BB199
If 1UR-FE is based on 1UR-FSE, can I take 1UR-FSE heads and put it on Lexus GX 460 (1UR-FE).

Can I turn 1UR-FE into 1UR-FSE?
I don't believe you can. It has ports for the dierect injectors and I believe the combustion chamber is a different shape. I'm not certain about this; I would have to see them side by side.
Old 12-10-19, 06:44 PM
  #40  
Lwerewolf
Instructor
 
Lwerewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Sofia
Posts: 1,223
Received 243 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Different heads, two high pressure fuel pumps, fuel rails, ECU, injectors, injector drivers, ECU, probably bottom end (piston/rod/crank) as well - probably reduced compression + combustion chamber not developed for the direct injector spray. Would be cheaper to just supercharge the FE, I guess.

Re: the compression - I think I was looking at parts a while back and the GS had the same bottom end, block and head as the LS, so the compression should be the same. The lower compression was for the FE, I believe.
Old 12-24-19, 01:54 AM
  #41  
VanCityLS4
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
VanCityLS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: PacificNorthWest
Posts: 623
Received 75 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

The LS460 has the same headers as the ISF. The GS460 uses the log tube style header found in the L430. The exhaust is true dual all the way. There is definitely some power missing from that formula.
The following users liked this post:
tiguy99 (07-31-20)
Old 08-14-20, 06:24 PM
  #42  
GS460V8
Driver
 
GS460V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: CANT
Posts: 137
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whlkev
HOWEVER, Lexus press release still states GS460 has 1UR-FSE, which i now believe is a typo and could explain why I never hear this "infamous" direct injection noise.

Apologies if this is old but just in case it hasn't been covered, I have a 2008 GS 460 with D4S direct injection being the 1UR-FSE engine, it's JDM so maybe that's the difference?
Old 08-31-20, 09:24 PM
  #43  
Helo58
Pole Position
 
Helo58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 252
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VanCityLS4
The LS460 has the same headers as the ISF. The GS460 uses the log tube style header found in the L430. The exhaust is true dual all the way. There is definitely some power missing from that formula.
Is this the case? Has this been verified? I have been searching for this info which led me to this post, but haven't found anything conclusive. I am currently looking at LS460s and would like a few more simple bolt-on HPs. Coming from an ISF, headers and full exhaust made a huge difference there. I'd be happy with half of that gain here.
Old 09-04-20, 04:30 PM
  #44  
GS460V8
Driver
 
GS460V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: CANT
Posts: 137
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
The intake might not account fully for the 40HP decrease, but I think a large part of it could be intake, somewhere over 20HP.
I'd almost agree there. With an intake like this, IMO I'd imagine a cold air box and enough flow volume to suit the engine would really only give you a maximum of ~15% max. HP increase.
Old 09-04-20, 04:38 PM
  #45  
GS460V8
Driver
 
GS460V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: CANT
Posts: 137
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whlkev
lol i would hate to be the guinea pig for everything, to do this right, I'll have to dyno my car before and after the CAI

also, increasing the airflow isn't going to do squat when the ECU isn't properly adjusted for the increase so proper air/fuel ratio will have to be remapped via chip upgrade
I tend to disagree. The factory ECU will have a map that exceeds the bounds of what it was designed for if it reaches excessive whatever it might be such as air volume consumed, it has to know what to do with it in any case to maintain AFR. If there are huge modifications done then I would agree the chipping or a new ECU style approach would have to be taken but, there is no way a CAI or exhaust is really going to give the current ECU any struggles as it will be well within its bounds to deal with that.

Not that I have seen this ECU's fuel and ignition maps yet but I think I have enough experience here to know this would be the case. There will be plenty of Headroom here for these kinds of mods. As far as air fuel ratio goes, one major job of the ECU is to maintain this by using that fuel map so I highly doubt AFR is going to be out at all over such simple mods as well. Personally I think opening up the exhaust and intake on of the GS460 would be a smashing move without any other expensive necessities.


Last edited by GS460V8; 09-04-20 at 04:47 PM.


Quick Reply: Engine Comparison: LS460 vs. GS460 w/ engine cover off - Pictures



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:09 AM.