Anyone else highly dissapointed at Gen3 GS?
I got over it.
I love the new GS too... I think it's also fresh and sculpted. All in my opinion, the technology is completely up to date for the year 2005 and I think won't become outdated for years. I drove the new Acura RL and they are very comparable in terms of interior technologies. I feel like I'm driving a space shuttle.
This new GS feels as if a sport pkg is already equipped in the vehicle. With the metal and aluminum trim in console - a very sporty agrresive and clean look. Its a very inviting car that screams attitude from all corners of the car, even in the seat design and feel to the guages in this car. everything - VERY NICE!
The styling, especially in the front - gets a 12.0 / 10.0 major major major
Looks aside, I would have a difficult time buying the new GS based on styling alone. I have a 300Hp Lexus that is paid for and I want to spend $50K for another Lexus with 300Hp? No, I don't think so. For me, that equates to a lot of $$$ and/or ego lubricant for simply the benefit of a new "look".
I'm out of the GS market until there is a significant performace advantage over my current GS - I'm guessing 400Hp is going to be the number that motivates me. When the GS came out in 1998 it set a new performance threshold - that's what got me excited about the car. To me, "looks" must be a given to even enter the game. If it looks good, then performance is my next measure. The new GS, with no doubt in my mind is a stunning car, but line up next to an old 400/430 at a stoplight or on the highway and $50K doesn't buy you thing except "looking good". I'm getting to old for that or just maybe the benefits of that $50K are more important elsewhere in my life.
I think Lexus missed a real opportunity to seize upon what they did in '98.
Eric
Trending Topics
Looks aside, I would have a difficult time buying the new GS based on styling alone. I have a 300Hp Lexus that is paid for and I want to spend $50K for another Lexus with 300Hp? No, I don't think so. For me, that equates to a lot of $$$ and/or ego lubricant for simply the benefit of a new "look".
I'm out of the GS market until there is a significant performace advantage over my current GS - I'm guessing 400Hp is going to be the number that motivates me. When the GS came out in 1998 it set a new performance threshold - that's what got me excited about the car. To me, "looks" must be a given to even enter the game. If it looks good, then performance is my next measure. The new GS, with no doubt in my mind is a stunning car, but line up next to an old 400/430 at a stoplight or on the highway and $50K doesn't buy you thing except "looking good". I'm getting to old for that or just maybe the benefits of that $50K are more important elsewhere in my life.
I think Lexus missed a real opportunity to seize upon what they did in '98.
Eric
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Looks aside, I would have a difficult time buying the new GS based on styling alone. I have a 300Hp Lexus that is paid for and I want to spend $50K for another Lexus with 300Hp? No, I don't think so. For me, that equates to a lot of $$$ and/or ego lubricant for simply the benefit of a new "look".
I'm out of the GS market until there is a significant performace advantage over my current GS - I'm guessing 400Hp is going to be the number that motivates me. When the GS came out in 1998 it set a new performance threshold - that's what got me excited about the car. To me, "looks" must be a given to even enter the game. If it looks good, then performance is my next measure. The new GS, with no doubt in my mind is a stunning car, but line up next to an old 400/430 at a stoplight or on the highway and $50K doesn't buy you thing except "looking good". I'm getting to old for that or just maybe the benefits of that $50K are more important elsewhere in my life.
I think Lexus missed a real opportunity to seize upon what they did in '98.
Eric
I guess we just have to get over this business decision. The GS460 and GS450h are coming in a couple of years you know.

As for being disappointed by the new GS, I for one was hugely disappointed by how it looked when it was first released and I shouted out loud that I hated it no matter from which angle I looked. But now I find it beautiful and sexy.
My only gripes are that they have reserved some awesome features only for the GS430, not making them even options on the GS300, and that AWD is only available on the GS300. Other than those, I believe the technological advances on the new GS are worthy enough as a next-generation vehicle.
Last edited by XeroK00L; Feb 22, 2005 at 09:55 AM.
I guess we just have to get over this business decision. The GS460 and GS450h are coming in a couple of years you know.


You know how business and accounting people like to make their businesses look like it's on a constant growth and not some rollercoaster, big ups-and-downs ride. That's what the business decision is about, unfortunately.
Last edited by XeroK00L; Feb 22, 2005 at 10:11 AM.
CL represents only a small majority of Lexus purchasers and I'm sure Toyota isn't worried if we like the car's hp numbers or not.
I also agree with DaveGS4. I thought the 1998 GS had the ugliest rear end on a car. But, I got to like it over the years.
CL represents only a small majority of Lexus purchasers and I'm sure Toyota isn't worried if we like the car's hp numbers or not.











