what psi of boost before fuel/boost cut on stock 2jzge ecu?
#1
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: md
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what psi of boost before fuel/boost cut on stock 2jzge ecu?
Currently finishing up my single turbo install (garrett 466159-5008), and was wondering how much pressure the stock ecu will allow before cutting? i have a 4psi wastegate spring right now and im hoping car is driveable this way. i do have a wideband, and will be installing a 1:1 rising rate fuel pressure regulator to hopefully not kill the motor instantly lol
also, i know if i put the maf before the turbo it wont read boost at all and i was wondering if this is better. so draw-thru vs. blow-thru?
also, i know if i put the maf before the turbo it wont read boost at all and i was wondering if this is better. so draw-thru vs. blow-thru?
#2
Racer
the 2jzge ecu has no map to see boost pressure. You are asking to blow your motor without a piggyback or changing your ecu. You need to google the Ali_SC 2jzgte ecu swap.
#3
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: md
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i know you have alot of knowledge on this subject, and i appreciate your input.
but
take into consideration how a maf works, it measures airflow and the ecu calculates fuel demand in conjunction with tps voltage. if the maf sees additional airflow the computer will respond appropriately up to its built in limit, i.e. "maf sensor voltage out of range". the o2 sensor also tells the ecu to add or reduce fuel.
as long as i dont add too much extra air, it can compensate. i know these cars run a bit rich anyway, mine has always showed 10.9-11.5 afr on the dyno.
dont get upset, i do plan on doing the tt ecu swap in a little while but i wanna experiment a little bit
but
take into consideration how a maf works, it measures airflow and the ecu calculates fuel demand in conjunction with tps voltage. if the maf sees additional airflow the computer will respond appropriately up to its built in limit, i.e. "maf sensor voltage out of range". the o2 sensor also tells the ecu to add or reduce fuel.
as long as i dont add too much extra air, it can compensate. i know these cars run a bit rich anyway, mine has always showed 10.9-11.5 afr on the dyno.
dont get upset, i do plan on doing the tt ecu swap in a little while but i wanna experiment a little bit
#5
Racer
10.8-11.2 is your ideal AFR under boost, so i would just fixate on that, add a 1:1 fpr, but I still don't understand where you are trying to go with it..Why risk it.
Here's someone on the is300 forums with a 1:1 fpr with 6 psi running 11.5-12.1 AFR, which I feel is pushing too lean. He also tried .6/.7 bar, 8.5-10psi and blew a head gasket and cracked his ring lands.
http://my.is/forums/f114/2jz-na-t-st...rience-593841/
Here's someone on the is300 forums with a 1:1 fpr with 6 psi running 11.5-12.1 AFR, which I feel is pushing too lean. He also tried .6/.7 bar, 8.5-10psi and blew a head gasket and cracked his ring lands.
http://my.is/forums/f114/2jz-na-t-st...rience-593841/
Last edited by joewitafro; 06-03-18 at 10:51 AM.
#6
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: md
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that thread on the 2gs was exactly what i was looking for!
like i said in my first post: my wg spring is .3 bar so im definitely within the safe range, i already have a 1:1 fpr i will be installing, and i have a wideband to moniter afr.
i will not be attempting to raise the boost until i get my tt ecu. i already ordered one, just need to get ign coils and the right maf and map to go with it
like i said in my first post: my wg spring is .3 bar so im definitely within the safe range, i already have a 1:1 fpr i will be installing, and i have a wideband to moniter afr.
i will not be attempting to raise the boost until i get my tt ecu. i already ordered one, just need to get ign coils and the right maf and map to go with it
#7
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: md
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
okay guys, car is finished and driving. afr is averaging 10.8-11.5 on wot pulls @0.3 bar
pulls good, boost comes on at 2500.
dyno numbers and 1/4 mile times within a few weeks
pulls good, boost comes on at 2500.
dyno numbers and 1/4 mile times within a few weeks
Trending Topics
#9
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: md
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
car still runs perfect, still at 4psi, went to the dragstrip and did a trackday with no issues.
car is about to get taken apart for some changes:
cd009 6spd is going in finally
getting turbo manifold ceramic coated
installing turbo blanket
installing heat wrap on downpipe
wrapping charge piping in gold heat tape
insulator gaskets on intake manifold
all new oem gaskets on engine and maybe head studs
megasquirt standalone ecu
car is about to get taken apart for some changes:
cd009 6spd is going in finally
getting turbo manifold ceramic coated
installing turbo blanket
installing heat wrap on downpipe
wrapping charge piping in gold heat tape
insulator gaskets on intake manifold
all new oem gaskets on engine and maybe head studs
megasquirt standalone ecu
#10
Racer
I would skip the turbo blanket and instead build a heat shield. I know you're na-t and thats why your trying to keep intake charge cold, i agree on everything else.
#11
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: md
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i currently am running a heatshield, but with no way for the heat to escape the engine bay it only helps a tiny bit. Id rather trap the heat inside the metal and let it cool after it goes under the car.
i already have all the parts i listed above, just waiting until i have my other turbo car (94 tercel) put back together and out of my workspace
i already have all the parts i listed above, just waiting until i have my other turbo car (94 tercel) put back together and out of my workspace
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SC300T
Performance & Maintenance
18
09-24-02 09:53 PM