Notices
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018) Forum for all 1990 - 2018 ES Models

ES350 2008 Audio Disappointment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #1  
ms500's Avatar
ms500
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default ES350 2008 Audio Disappointment

I am very disappointed with the audio range in my ES350. No crisp highs and mushy bass. Has anyone found an aftermarket modification to the stereo that is very effective and reasonable in price? Many thanks!
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #2  
sirCharles's Avatar
sirCharles
Lead Lap
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 733
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

just have a shop replace all the interior speakers with better wattage ones a fair price and install an amp for the mids and highs. If you need bass same setup speakers/amp in trunk.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 08:13 AM
  #3  
clarky86's Avatar
clarky86
Rookie
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 59
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
Default

I agree - the stock stereo sucks. I replaced mine with the Mark Levinson and it is much better although still not the best.

The stock speakers are 4 ohm no name cheap looking plastic things from China. The amplifier is Pioneer and looks to be decent quality with a large heatsink. I have to believe going aftermarket speakers will help a lot. They look to use standard opening sizes. two tweets in the dash corners, one center mid in the middle of the dash, two 6x9 mid in the front door, two 6.5" round in the back door, one sub (2x2.5ohm) in the back deck.

I would start with replacing the two dash tweets and front doors mids and see how it sounds then. Make sure to keep them all 4 ohm to match the factory speakers. Quick fact, these speakers are on the same wire...RF dash parallel wired to RF door.

Let us know what happens.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #4  
TLPLEXUS's Avatar
TLPLEXUS
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 102
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

How difficult is it to replace the stock audio unit with the Mark Levinson unit? and where can you buy that unit from? My 1999 Toyota Solara standard stock stereo sounds more powerful thant the Lexus ES stock stereo.

Upgrading thes speakers sounds like a good plan to start. Can you add an amp to our standard stereo unit though? Let me know how you guys do. I might follow suit.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 04:32 AM
  #5  
clarky86's Avatar
clarky86
Rookie
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 59
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by TLPLEXUS
How difficult is it to replace the stock audio unit with the Mark Levinson unit?
Moderately difficult. You need to add a few wires/connectors and make a couple of cuts in the stock wiring. Then you need to cut in new rear door tweeters and package tray midrange speakers and make new openings in the dash corner speaker grills. You are going from 8 to 14 speakers. Everything else, including the ML amp bolts right in. The good thing is, my car looks and sounds like it came with it from the factory. I probably would not go through the hassle if I had to do it over.

Originally Posted by TLPLEXUS
and where can you buy that unit from?
Lexus for $5000 or Junkyard for much less. I found a smashed UL in a junkyard.
Originally Posted by TLPLEXUS
Upgrading thes speakers sounds like a good plan to start. Can you add an amp to our standard stereo unit though?
I like to keep the factory amp and not mess with any stock functionality. Ive heard of guys adding an amp to drive a sub.
Originally Posted by TLPLEXUS
Let me know how you guys do. I might follow suit.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 04:46 AM
  #6  
IS350jet's Avatar
IS350jet
Pole Position
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 1
From: Coral Springs, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by clarky86
I agree - the stock stereo sucks. I replaced mine with the Mark Levinson and it is much better although still not the best.

The stock speakers are 4 ohm no name cheap looking plastic things from China. The amplifier is Pioneer and looks to be decent quality with a large heatsink. I have to believe going aftermarket speakers will help a lot. They look to use standard opening sizes. two tweets in the dash corners, one center mid in the middle of the dash, two 6x9 mid in the front door, two 6.5" round in the back door, one sub (2x2.5ohm) in the back deck.

I would start with replacing the two dash tweets and front doors mids and see how it sounds then. Make sure to keep them all 4 ohm to match the factory speakers. Quick fact, these speakers are on the same wire...RF dash parallel wired to RF door.

Let us know what happens.
All speakers in the ES are round, no 6X9's BTW, was their a huge difference in the ML sound quality over the standard system? I had the ML in my IS and it was amazing.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 05:05 AM
  #7  
clarky86's Avatar
clarky86
Rookie
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 59
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by IS350jet
All speakers in the ES are round, no 6X9's BTW, was their a huge difference in the ML sound quality over the standard system? I had the ML in my IS and it was amazing.
True - the actual speakers are round but the front door speakers are in 6x9 mounts. Good to know for someone looking to upgrade.

I think the stock system was bad (D) and the ML is very good (B+). With a good source (CD or iPod) it really shines.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 10:18 AM
  #8  
IS350jet's Avatar
IS350jet
Pole Position
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 1
From: Coral Springs, Fl
Default

Thanks, clarky. I must be getting old. As good as the ML was in my IS, I was quite surprised that the standard ES system wasn't that bad. Going from ML to a standard Lexus premium system, I was expecting a lot worse.
Reply
ClubLexus Stories

Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe

story-0

TRD Off-Road Premium: Best 2026 4Runner, Except This One Thing

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Lexus & Toyotas to Drive Before You Die!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

Top 10 Lexus/Toyotas With The LEAST 5-Year Depreciation

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Lexus LC500 Convertible Auction: A Preview of Rising Values?

 Brett Foote
story-4

GX 550 vs TX 550: Best 3-Row Luxury Lexus Family Hauler

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

9 Best Lexus Models You Can Buy for Half Price (And 1 You Shouldn't!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

2026 Lexus NX Buyer's Guide: Models, Features, Prices & More!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 Reasons to Buy a Lexus TX 550h+ (& 3 Reasons to AVOID!)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Top 10 Lexus & Toyota Models of the 1990s RANKED!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Great Toyotas That Could Have Been Lexus Models

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 11:36 AM
  #9  
bobsobi's Avatar
bobsobi
Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by clarky86
I think the stock system was bad (D) and the ML is very good (B+).
I just replaced my 1999 ES with a 2009 -- after auditioning the '09's stock audio, there was no doubt I would have to get the ML.

Sad thing is, the old car's system, while not capable of surround or playing as loud, was one of the most musical stock systems I'd ever heard, with a very natural and flat FR, easily more accurate than the '09's ML!

The ML system has an annoying peak in the upper-bass, lower-midrange, around 200 - 400Hz that can't be touched with the mostly useless tone controls. It renders some mixes almost unlistenable.

I find it hard to believe that such a costly, "premium" system wouldn't be tuned to the cabin! Or they couldn't throw in an equalizer for the extra $$??

Then there's the nanny-car annoyance of having to set the PARKING BRAKE to get to the DVD screen to start DVD-Vs (thankfully, DVD-As start like CDs) -- this thing's starting to get me pretty PO'd!

I think you're overly generous with your B+. With the expectations that come from all the ML hype, I'd have to say C, maybe C-.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 12:47 PM
  #10  
safford197's Avatar
safford197
Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 184
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

I wouldn't waste the money on the ML again if I had it to do over... The sub in my '07 hits against the speaker mount at very low frequencies with the volume very low. Also, for the price you get no additional frequency controls or surround options. Sound on most music is great and props for the crisp speach on DVDs, but I felt like the audio system in my '06 IS350 was just as good...
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 01:12 PM
  #11  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To me Lexus has dumbed down the stock system so you pay for the ML system which is leaps and bounds better
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #12  
bobsobi's Avatar
bobsobi
Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by safford197
The sub in my '07 hits against the speaker mount at very low frequencies with the volume very low. Also, for the price you get no additional frequency controls or surround options.
Bingo! They should have included an equalizer! And you're right -- not enough surround options. The surround is essentially useless with my dualdiscs -- the system refuses to play anything but the 2.0 data from them. Stupid! Straight DVD-As, DVD-Vs and MVIs are okay, however.

You might consider having Lexus swap out your sub -- mine reaches its excursion limit on John Mayer's Continuum a couple times at moderately loud volume, and I'm going to bring it up when I go in for my complimentary 5K service. In fact, I'll probably mention that dualdisc incompatibility as well to see what they say.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 06:57 AM
  #13  
tvlenthe's Avatar
tvlenthe
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default "Premium Sound" '07 ES350 vs. '99 ES300

Originally Posted by bobsobi
I just replaced my 1999 ES with a 2009 -- after auditioning the '09's stock audio, there was no doubt I would have to get the ML.

Sad thing is, the old car's system, while not capable of surround or playing as loud, was one of the most musical stock systems I'd ever heard, with a very natural and flat FR, easily more accurate than the '09's ML!
I just purchased '07 CPO ES350 with NAV and the standard "("premium") sound. While the sound is "OK", I agree that it's not in the same class as my standard '99 system (RIP @ 243K miles). (The rest of the '07 is terrific!) To my ears, it lacks the clarity and smoothness of the older system. Tweaking the tone controls only make marginal improvements in one area while degrading the overall balance.

I'm looking to upgrade the factory speakers in the front doors (Boston SL65?). Any other thoughts or suggestions? Anyone had success with finding/modifying the "hidden" audio settings?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 10:46 AM
  #14  
garsarno's Avatar
garsarno
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 6
From: PA
Default

I've upgraded speakers on other cars in the past. No real improvement in sound. Unless you are willing to replace the sysem completely, save the money and remember this for your next car purchase. Once you go ML, you can't go back!
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 01:25 AM
  #15  
savon's Avatar
savon
Rookie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

IMO, ML system is designed primarily for listening to 5.1 surround system discs which are mostly DVD-A or DVD-V. If you are listening to CD, It doesnt sound that great specially if you burned that CD on low bitrate or it is a low quality recording. ML system actually shows how bad the recordings are on a CD (IMO, thats why most people think it isn't a good system). I found out this when I tried the same songs on different CD's. I no longer listen to any CD in my car after listening to DVD-V with 5.1 recording.
I have spent 10k on my home theater system, and I can tell you that I still like to go to listen to ML system in my car. Lexus engineers have done a excellent job. For quality of music you hear what lexus offers is a bargain with ML system. I am curious to know people who think this is a B, C, or D system, what kind of audio system they had in their cars that sounded better than ML.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:14 PM.

story-0
TRD Off-Road Premium: Best 2026 4Runner, Except This One Thing

Slideshow: diving into 4Runner TRD Off-Road Premium's pricing, performance, fuel economy, features, and amenities!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-23 13:09:18


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Lexus & Toyotas to Drive Before You Die!

Slideshow: the 10 Lexus and Toyota vehicles you need to drive before you die.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-23 10:34:24


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Lexus/Toyotas With The LEAST 5-Year Depreciation

Slideshow: Top 10 Lexus/Toyota models with the lowest 5-year depreciation rate.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 12:19:06


VIEW MORE
story-3
Lexus LC500 Convertible Auction: A Preview of Rising Values?

The LC hasn't even disappeared from the Lexus lineup yet, and we're already seeing signs of an explosive market.

By Brett Foote | 2026-04-06 09:25:02


VIEW MORE
story-4
GX 550 vs TX 550: Best 3-Row Luxury Lexus Family Hauler

Slideshow: comparing the pricings, specs, power, fuel economy, fun-factor, and features of the GX 550 Luxury+ and TX 550h+ Luxury.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-03-19 13:44:11


VIEW MORE
story-5
9 Best Lexus Models You Can Buy for Half Price (And 1 You Shouldn't!)

Slideshow: 9 best Lexus models you can buy for half price and 1 you should avoid

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-03-19 12:01:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2026 Lexus NX Buyer's Guide: Models, Features, Prices & More!

Here's everything you need to know about the latest NX.

By Brett Foote | 2026-03-19 11:56:59


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Reasons to Buy a Lexus TX 550h+ (& 3 Reasons to AVOID!)

Slideshow: reviewing the 2026 Lexus TX 550h+ Luxury plug-in hybrid crossover SUV!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-03-05 19:04:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Lexus & Toyota Models of the 1990s RANKED!

Slideshow: Top 10 Lexus and Toyota model of the 1990s ranked.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-03-04 12:35:11


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Great Toyotas That Could Have Been Lexus Models

Slideshow: 10 Toyotas that could have been Lexus models.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-02-19 11:44:33


VIEW MORE