Premium fuel or lower / Octane requirements (merged threads)
Several of us tested with the 2005 Avalon when it was first out and we didn't measure any significant difference in MPG between 87 or 91 octane. Of course the ES350 is using a much better tranny than the Avalon and the computer profiles must be very different.
Has anyone ever heard of engine damage due to lower rated gas used? I highly doubt the car will break due to one tank of 87, but I feel kinda paranoid so I want some expert advise. Thanks.
BTW, those are real numbers as the computer is typically optimistic by about 1.5 mpg.
BTW, those are real numbers as the computer is typically optimistic by about 1.5 mpg.
Trending Topics
If the 87 octane had less sulfur content, I would be using it instead of the 92 octane I am using now at 7,000+ feet. In my case, due to high sulfur there would be damage.
With U.S. gas no worries. Keep in mind that if you switch from one octane to another, don't go back and forth stick to one.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
If the 87 octane had less sulfur content, I would be using it instead of the 92 octane I am using now at 7,000+ feet. In my case, due to high sulfur there would be damage.
With U.S. gas no worries. Keep in mind that if you switch from one octane to another, don't go back and forth stick to one.
The Premium used to be 220 ppm minimum (Mexico City), but now ranges between 30 and 80.
One time I had to use magna out in the boonies (and when I mean boonies, I mean boonies, really rural area), and a precat went on the fritz (both since removed to prevent a repeat).
Pemex is losing its output out in the big reserve it has out in the Gulf, and soon will have to find either additional deposits or use land based ones that aren't connected like one giant swimming pool, but all over the place near Tampico.
In addition, there always refinery issues and we import most our premium fron the U.S., where Mexican crude is processed in Texas.

















