what do you think?
Are you guys trying to copy (or take inspiration from) the Skipper rear with the brake light and fins?
i'm not personally a fan of the brake light down there, so if you ask me, i wouldn't have one lol. I think it would look much cleaner without it.
But if you must have it, the Skipper brake light looks a lot smaller and thus, less noticeable, which i think is a good thing. It also is more tucked in and doesn't jut out as much.
i'm not personally a fan of the brake light down there, so if you ask me, i wouldn't have one lol. I think it would look much cleaner without it.
But if you must have it, the Skipper brake light looks a lot smaller and thus, less noticeable, which i think is a good thing. It also is more tucked in and doesn't jut out as much.
Are you guys trying to copy (or take inspiration from) the Skipper rear with the brake light and fins?
i'm not personally a fan of the brake light down there, so if you ask me, i wouldn't have one lol. I think it would look much cleaner without it.
But if you must have it, the Skipper brake light looks a lot smaller and thus, less noticeable, which i think is a good thing. It also is more tucked in and doesn't jut out as much.
i'm not personally a fan of the brake light down there, so if you ask me, i wouldn't have one lol. I think it would look much cleaner without it.
But if you must have it, the Skipper brake light looks a lot smaller and thus, less noticeable, which i think is a good thing. It also is more tucked in and doesn't jut out as much.
Lexon did it first..just saying! I have a lexon diffuser and third brake light 🤷🏽*♂️
yeah just skip the brake light. the design pictured seems to squared off in relation to the car. its like it was copied+pasted from a totally different kind of car. if anything it should be angled in some way instead of perfectly rectangle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shabbyblue
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
4
Sep 14, 2014 01:39 AM








