Scanner Danner says, "Reading codes is NOT a diagnosis!"
/// UPDATE 05-20-2022 ///
If allowed this thread is open for discussion on all things related to complex auto diagnostics people might like.
I'm a big fan of Scanner Danner and some are fans of Patt Goss and others as seen below so feel free to post links, videos or whatever is relevant to proper diagnostics and your favorite tech who rants or has info about proper diagnosis- just for fun!
Hi friends,
Hopefully some Scanner Danner fans on here.
Who's never been a "Part's Changer" when trying to diagnose a complicated problem hoping for the best?
Hate to admit but I know I have... lolol
If allowed this thread is open for discussion on all things related to complex auto diagnostics people might like.
I'm a big fan of Scanner Danner and some are fans of Patt Goss and others as seen below so feel free to post links, videos or whatever is relevant to proper diagnostics and your favorite tech who rants or has info about proper diagnosis- just for fun!
Hi friends,
Hopefully some Scanner Danner fans on here.
Who's never been a "Part's Changer" when trying to diagnose a complicated problem hoping for the best?
Hate to admit but I know I have... lolol
Last edited by Margate330; May 20, 2022 at 04:15 PM.
Exactly. Pat Goss, the Lead Technician for Motorweek, has spoken of this numerous times in his call-in show. After a code is indicated by the scanning-device, a specific step-procedure for trouble-shooting has to be followed for that code...a series of individual steps to identify and isolate the problem once and for all. That proper procedure is listed in the vehicle's Service Manual and info-sources like All-Data. Otherwise, by just reacting to a code and nothing else, the Technician is just throwing new parts at a problem that may or many not actually solve it.
Last edited by mmarshall; Feb 21, 2022 at 09:44 PM.
Exactly. Pat Goss, the Lead Technician for Motorweek, has spoken of this numerous times in his call-in show. After a code is indicated by the scanning-device, a specific step-procedure for trouble-shooting has to be followed for that code...a series of individual steps to identify and isolate the problem once and for all. That proper procedure is listed in the vehicle's Service Manual and info-sources like All-Data. Otherwise, by just reacting to a code and nothing else, the Technician is just throwing new parts at a problem that may or many not actually solve it.
All I know is I've seen several threads on here of people getting work done based on codes and failed(myself included).
People I know have heard mechanics say as long as the engine is running they don't want to see their car until it thowing codes or wait until it throws a code and then call for appointment.
He's done videos on the subject, and dealt with it on his talk show. Here's a couple of them:https://www.motorweek.org/features/g...e/code-readers
https://www.goss-garage.com/2012/05/...-check-basics/
Generally I agree with not throwing parts at a problem without a thorough diagnoses. Some DIY folks, however, don't have the shop manuals for following the trouble-shooting procedures. Or, don't have the tools or skills necessary. But, with the aid of internet research, one can still make an educated guess and change-out parts known to have high-failure rates. Even if the parts don't fix the problem, if they have high-failure rates, like coils for instance, it can be thought of as preventive maintenance.
Sometimes even professionals throw parts at problems without a proper diagnoses. They can make more money this way, charging the customer all along the way! In the end they explain to the customer that all of the parts were "contributing" to the problem, and 99.9% of customers don't even question it. This is one more reason I do all my own work!
Sometimes even professionals throw parts at problems without a proper diagnoses. They can make more money this way, charging the customer all along the way! In the end they explain to the customer that all of the parts were "contributing" to the problem, and 99.9% of customers don't even question it. This is one more reason I do all my own work!
Sure. Be glad to.
He's done videos on the subject, and dealt with it on his talk show. Here's a couple of them:
https://www.motorweek.org/features/g...e/code-readers
https://www.goss-garage.com/2012/05/...-check-basics/
He's done videos on the subject, and dealt with it on his talk show. Here's a couple of them:https://www.motorweek.org/features/g...e/code-readers
https://www.goss-garage.com/2012/05/...-check-basics/
Generally I agree with not throwing parts at a problem without a thorough diagnoses. Some DIY folks, however, don't have the shop manuals for following the trouble-shooting procedures. Or, don't have the tools or skills necessary. But, with the aid of internet research, one can still make an educated guess and change-out parts known to have high-failure rates. Even if the parts don't fix the problem, if they have high-failure rates, like coils for instance, it can be thought of as preventive maintenance.
Sometimes even professionals throw parts at problems without a proper diagnoses. They can make more money this way, charging the customer all along the way! In the end they explain to the customer that all of the parts were "contributing" to the problem, and 99.9% of customers don't even question it. This is one more reason I do all my own work!
Sometimes even professionals throw parts at problems without a proper diagnoses. They can make more money this way, charging the customer all along the way! In the end they explain to the customer that all of the parts were "contributing" to the problem, and 99.9% of customers don't even question it. This is one more reason I do all my own work!
I have struggled with rough idle on my 2004 RX330 a couple times now.
Never throwing a code but one time was due to intermittent weak spark from my fake "OEM china clone ignition coils when I was ignorant they were selling fake stuff on ebay. Drove me crazy because scanned everything and analyzed wave forms for crank, cams, ignition, fuel injectors, etc, etc and found nothing wrong.
Finally said same thing you did with the idea that I have an old car with 150k miles and I'm sure it needs motor mounts anyway for preventative maintenance. Helped a little and then said maybe I'll replace the MAF and O2 sensors too even though I find no fault in them so I can have new parts and keep old ones for a spare.
Yeah I was getting desparate but I knew if I took it to a shop they wouldn't spend the time to figure it out either- especially without a code to work from. lol
Finally the intermittent rough idle grew persistently worse until I could figure out what was going on but not till after several months of aggrevation.
Exactly. Pat Goss, the Lead Technician for Motorweek, has spoken of this numerous times in his call-in show. After a code is indicated by the scanning-device, a specific step-procedure for trouble-shooting has to be followed for that code...a series of individual steps to identify and isolate the problem once and for all. That proper procedure is listed in the vehicle's Service Manual and info-sources like All-Data. Otherwise, by just reacting to a code and nothing else, the Technician is just throwing new parts at a problem that may or many not actually solve it.
Trending Topics
Agreed. Yes, we can extend the life of our vehicle's components to some degree with flushing all the fluids regularly, but one has to do a cost/benefit calculation to know if it is worth it, especially if the services are beyond what the manufacturer recommends. However, another cost to consider is the environmental one. Sending spent fluids to the waste stream should be factored in as well. Shops who "over-maintain" are profiting and their customers might sleep better at night, but the planet unnecessarily suffers.
Goss is excellent (one of the best) when it comes to diagnosing electrical problems and issues.
But, he may (?) be going a little overboard in some of his service-recommendations.....and he's a big one for flushing everything out. If you listened to everything he said literally, you'd be flushing out all of the systems underhood (and the brake lines) every 2 years /24,000 miles....probably spending more on maintenance than what the vehicle cost in the first place.
mmarshall,
Just remembered going back and forth about Pat Goss in this thread not too long ago and just heard of his unexpected passing. Total bummer as my father used to go to his shop for years and I remember a long time ago sitting in the car with my father while he listened to his talk radio show in the weekends about cars.
Just remembered going back and forth about Pat Goss in this thread not too long ago and just heard of his unexpected passing. Total bummer as my father used to go to his shop for years and I remember a long time ago sitting in the car with my father while he listened to his talk radio show in the weekends about cars.
mmarshall,
Just remembered going back and forth about Pat Goss in this thread not too long ago and just heard of his unexpected passing. Total bummer as my father used to go to his shop for years and I remember a long time ago sitting in the car with my father while he listened to his talk radio show in the weekends about cars.
Just remembered going back and forth about Pat Goss in this thread not too long ago and just heard of his unexpected passing. Total bummer as my father used to go to his shop for years and I remember a long time ago sitting in the car with my father while he listened to his talk radio show in the weekends about cars.
Last edited by mmarshall; Mar 20, 2022 at 06:41 AM.
Yep....Thanks for the heads-up. Pat has indeed ridden off into the sunset. He will always be remembered for his unusually sharp ability to diagnose and treat auto-problems....particularly electronic issues. He had previously lost his wife, Bonnie, three years ago. Who is going to take over and/or run his repair-shop, I guess, remains to be seen.











