When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It is funny that they and GM crisscrossed on the axle. GM went from SRA to IRS a few years ago to give them parity with the Expedition and Navigator on rear interior space and ride.
If I had to choose between the Yukon/Tahoe or this, I'd pick the Yukon everyday, preferrably with the 6.2 or the diesel.
I was at a Toyota dealer today. This was the sticker on a Sequoia Capstone. I actually laughed out loud:
$100,000 for that?
My favorite part of that is the $2500 worth of insurance you have to buy for the low, low price of....$2495. Such a deal!
That, and that you're paying $1595 for "Delivery, Processing and Handling Fee", yet still need a $500 Processing Charge--because apparently that's different than a fee.
My favorite part of that is the $2500 worth of insurance you have to buy for the low, low price of....$2495. Such a deal!
That, and that you're paying $1595 for "Delivery, Processing and Handling Fee", yet still need a $500 Processing Charge--because apparently that's different than a fee.
Its just not a good overall package, steps forward some places steps backwards others. That doesn't mean the previous Sequoia was a compelling option either, it wasn't. Both vehicles were designed to sell to Toyota faithful and not to compete with the others in the segment because they know their customers won't consider a vehicle that isn't a Toyota
The old one was at least VERY good at its job and stupid versatile, the interior does suck and is very cheap even for the era it first came out.....nevermind at the end of its run! Still it's very good at performing a job
The issue is the markup, the original $81,000 sticker is not bad
For real? Not bad? I wouldn't expect a Toyota to cost this much even everything inflated. Now that I know how much it costs, it looks even worse. I forgot to say this... Steve didn't seem happy in that picture either. Lol
For real? Not bad? I wouldn't expect a Toyota to cost this much even everything inflated. Now that I know how much it costs, it looks even worse. I forgot to say this... Steve didn't seem happy in that picture either. Lol
Land Cruiser used to be more...and it was worth it.
Originally Posted by Striker223
The old one was at least VERY good at its job and stupid versatile, the interior does suck and is very cheap even for the era it first came out.....nevermind at the end of its run! Still it's very good at performing a job
The new interior does suck too..it is very cheap, if not worse in some places. But it is masked a little bitter better to throw you off.
I personally never understood why people bought LC either. It's a Toyota after all. And I thought it was around how much the GX costed. Did it go up?
Land Cruiser are quite special. IMO. Interior build quality is higher quality than domestic Toyota SUVS. Higher end leather as well Land Cruiser was about $86K. And you get ultra big Toyota V8. Sometimes you just don't want the badge. Last gen Toyota Land Cruiser had the highest tow capacity of any Toyota/Lexus SUV by about 1100lbs. Only Toyota that towed more was the Tundra.
Last edited by Toys4RJill; Mar 22, 2023 at 02:11 PM.
For real? Not bad? I wouldn't expect a Toyota to cost this much even everything inflated. Now that I know how much it costs, it looks even worse. I forgot to say this... Steve didn't seem happy in that picture either. Lol
LOL, yeah not happy!
But $81K fully loaded, like I said a moderate option Wagoneer (not a Grand Wagoneer) at the Chrysler dealer was $81k...so thats just what a fullsized SUV like that costs...