Driver caught speeding at 191 MPH - Toronto
This is a good point. My kids make me think twice now before i do something too crazy like going 200mph lol.
Unfortunately with speed - you have to pay to play and I probably have wasted enough $$$ on that to buy a used car. The fines / assessment for speeding are insane in NYC.
If anyone ever drives in Staten Island - please NEVER go over the speed limit! They got speed traps everywhere and will cite you for even 1mph over.
Unfortunately with speed - you have to pay to play and I probably have wasted enough $$$ on that to buy a used car. The fines / assessment for speeding are insane in NYC.
If anyone ever drives in Staten Island - please NEVER go over the speed limit! They got speed traps everywhere and will cite you for even 1mph over.
Last edited by RNM GS3; May 13, 2020 at 07:03 PM.
it doesn't seem like you've ever had a 'young and dumb' phase though... i'm sure your dad wouldn't have so freely leant you the keys to his LS if he thought you did, unless you were just better than me at concealing it lol
also what's the most powerful car you've driven? and i mean actually driven not just taken around the block
also what's the most powerful car you've driven? and i mean actually driven not just taken around the block
NYC is a terrible place to go fast... i'm surprised that you with your minimal suspension travel, low profile tire cars would be willing to drive quickly through there
Unfortunately with speed - you have to pay to play and I probably have wasted enough $$$ on that to buy a used car. The fines / assessment for speeding are insane in NYC.
If anyone ever drives in Staten Island - please NEVER go over the speed limit! They got speed traps everywhere and will cite you for even 1mph over.
It comes down to what needs to be made is a cost-benefit decision.
Opening up WILL lead to more cases. Its just common sense. More cases WILL lead to more death, again thats just common sense. The question is what economic cost are we willing to pay to delay those infections or deaths? Remember, we're talking about delays, absent a vaccine or better treatment experts agree that eventually the vast majority of us will contract this whether we stay in our homes or not.
What I do not agree with is the concept that "you cannot put a price on a life". Thats just hogwash. We put a price on life ALL THE TIME. If we didn't do that there would be no way to judge or mitigate risks. We balance money vs health and life all the time through legislation. Companies build products that they could have spent more money on developing that would have made them safer all the time, and we allow this as a government and as a society.
Economically we cannot afford to sit like this until a vaccine is found, if that time ever comes. There may never be a vaccine. There aren't any vaccines for other coronaviruses that I'm aware of. We have to figure out a way to balance the risk of sickness and death with the risk of huge economic failures here.
Opening up WILL lead to more cases. Its just common sense. More cases WILL lead to more death, again thats just common sense. The question is what economic cost are we willing to pay to delay those infections or deaths? Remember, we're talking about delays, absent a vaccine or better treatment experts agree that eventually the vast majority of us will contract this whether we stay in our homes or not.
What I do not agree with is the concept that "you cannot put a price on a life". Thats just hogwash. We put a price on life ALL THE TIME. If we didn't do that there would be no way to judge or mitigate risks. We balance money vs health and life all the time through legislation. Companies build products that they could have spent more money on developing that would have made them safer all the time, and we allow this as a government and as a society.
Economically we cannot afford to sit like this until a vaccine is found, if that time ever comes. There may never be a vaccine. There aren't any vaccines for other coronaviruses that I'm aware of. We have to figure out a way to balance the risk of sickness and death with the risk of huge economic failures here.
I've got two cars that probably match C63 performance, and I still feel that anything exceeding 80mph is very unsafe. These performance cars may be rated for high speeds, but at those speed physics forces are tremendous, and if anything goes wrong it gets very ugly. Not to mention that most drivers do not have the skills required for such speeds.
Common sense still applies. The "advisory limit" is 130KPH - the higher you are above it, the more likely you're deemed responsible in a potential incident. People don't just go flat out all the time. You won't get fined for speeding (well, not always), but you WILL get warned/fined for tailgating, coercion, overtaking on the right, etc. Even with all those + actually disciplined drivers, 300kph is NOT safe - the safest speed is generally the one that everybody's traveling at, due to a lack of relative motion.
One last bit:
https://www.portsmouthctc.org.uk/a-f...-on-the-roads/
I'm not flat-out against "highway pulls" or anything like that, but... you know, safety first
Just because "people have young and dumb phases" doesn't excuse behavior like that on a public road. If you still think thats okay, you're still in your young and dumb phase. Its a psychological construct called the personal fable, you don't think anything bad can or ever will happen to you. When you get older that construct fades and you start to worry about your own mortality and the consequences of that and risky crap like that doesn't have the same appeal.
You keep bringing it back to what the car can do and thats not the point. The point is what its safe to do on the road you're on. Its not safe to drive a car on the majority of US roads at those speeds. The roads aren't designed for it, other users of the roads aren't expecting to find another vehicle driving those speeds on them either. We've had this argument many times, you just don't get it.
also what's the most powerful car you've driven? and i mean actually driven not just taken around the block
Last edited by SW17LS; May 14, 2020 at 06:24 AM.
West Side Highway, FDR drive are both not that bad in the city.
Parts of BQE are a disaster.
Local streets- I never go over 30mph.
Too many potholes and cameras.
I've got two cars that probably match C63 performance, and I still feel that anything exceeding 80mph is very unsafe. These performance cars may be rated for high speeds, but at those speed physics forces are tremendous, and if anything goes wrong it gets very ugly. Not to mention that most drivers do not have the skills required for such speeds.
We literally are using maybe 50% of what these cars can comfortably do but you need to have skills to do it safely.
Enforcement is small part.
#1 should be training of drivers and testing skills to renew licenses!
Govt only cares about $$$ therefore speed cameras on a 6 lane Open road (3 each way) at 25mph is there solution. (This is a local road with red lights but it creates more traffic and less safety)
Well ever since the idiotic 25mph speed cameras- the pedestrian deaths have increased.
Enforcement is small part.
#1 should be training of drivers and testing skills to renew licenses!
Govt only cares about $$$ therefore speed cameras on a 6 lane Open road (3 each way) at 25mph is there solution. (This is a local road with red lights but it creates more traffic and less safety)
Enforcement is small part.
#1 should be training of drivers and testing skills to renew licenses!
Govt only cares about $$$ therefore speed cameras on a 6 lane Open road (3 each way) at 25mph is there solution. (This is a local road with red lights but it creates more traffic and less safety)
It needs to go on a road diet and reconfigured into two lanes in each direction with pedestrian alleys widened and properly fenced off. Its going to slow down the traffic, protect pedestrians, and make it easier for elderly pedestrians to cross it.
That being said, I still don't buy into idea of speeds over 80mph being safe or comfortable on public road, no matter how capable the cars may be. I don't have the stats, but its a safe bet to say that greater percentage of high performance cars get into wrecks vs regular family cars despite their cars being more capable.
Everyone has had a young and dumb phase, the point is to recognize as an older person that what you did younger was stupid. I drove that LS400 at 150MPH, although overall I was very respectful of it. Had my dad known I had done that, he would not have "been proud". I never would have seen the inside of it again. I would not drive a car at 150 MPH on a public road as the person I am today.
believe me i don't think that nothing can happen to me, i'm genuinely a moderate cautious driver 99% of the time but occasionally i'll chose my brief moment when the opportunity presents itself
i've also never said that 191 mph is safe, but in a car like the C63 with those power levels (and brakes) you only need like 3/4 a mile to go from 75 to 150 and back to 75 again, and there's plenty of closed off sections of road where it's literally impossible to put anyone else at risk or for another car to enter the road unless it literally fell from the sky
150 in a brand new 1998 LS 400 must've been quite a privileged experience lol, so i guess you were just better at hiding it than me















