Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

MT: Lexus: Hybrids Could Become Preferred Performance Powertrain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2019 | 05:32 PM
  #16  
mikedozz's Avatar
mikedozz
Instructor
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 77
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
Lexus, with the help of Toyota, is probably in a good spot already with EPA fuel economy ratings, so it does not need to offer any more electrified models at the moment to boost its rating. And without dirty diesels, it does not have to turn to electrification to clean up its image, like the European (luxury) automakers have been forced to do.



The already acceptable EPA ratings also means that Lexus does not need to add idle-stop systems to more cars in its lineup. Micro-hybrid (idle-stop) systems may help to save fuel in the real world -- dependent upon your local driving conditions -- but they contribute very little to official EPA ratings, since the EPA test does not include a large number of long stops that would make engine shutdowns truly beneficial.
Doesn't start/stop put extra wear n tear on the engine or no? I imagine this happening 20 times a day over 6 years has to do something vs only 3 times a day of start and shut off? Just curious.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2019 | 05:38 PM
  #17  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,285
Likes: 309
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by mikedozz
Doesn't start/stop put extra wear n tear on the engine or no? I imagine this happening 20 times a day over 6 years has to do something vs only 3 times a day of start and shut off? Just curious.
Toyota has start-stop tech for non hybrid motors. Used in markets outside the US. 1.2 turbo comes to mind. The current Highlander in the US has it. All of the hybrids have this feature too.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; Jul 17, 2019 at 05:47 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2019 | 06:05 PM
  #18  
Fizzboy7's Avatar
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,982
Likes: 241
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by mikedozz
Doesn't start/stop put extra wear n tear on the engine or no? I imagine this happening 20 times a day over 6 years has to do something vs only 3 times a day of start and shut off? Just curious.
I proposed that same question when the technology first debuted. I had the same concern. But the experts weighed in and said it does not cause premature wear. I still believe it may if they don't beef up starter components (maybe they have).
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2019 | 06:59 PM
  #19  
Sulu's Avatar
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 31
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by mikedozz
Doesn't start/stop put extra wear n tear on the engine or no? I imagine this happening 20 times a day over 6 years has to do something vs only 3 times a day of start and shut off? Just curious.
There should be no extra wear on the engine once it is warmed up and properly lubricated, and idle-stop systems are designed not to shut off the engine until it is warmed up. I don't see why there would be extra wear on the engine. If you leave the engine running while the car is stopped, would there not be wear on the engine?

The concern is that idle-stop systems put more wear on the starter but the starters on idle-stop systems have been beefed up to prevent this.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2019 | 07:22 AM
  #20  
riredale's Avatar
riredale
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 857
Likes: 47
From: Oregon
Default

And the idle-stop idea is just a stepping-stone on the way to full hybridization, where the "starter" motor is built into the powertrain, not engaging and disengaging in the traditional fashion. The 3.5L ICE on my RX is started and stopped many dozens of times even in the course of a short trip to the market, and since the starting is done by a beefy motor/generator driven by circuits delivering 600v, the spinning-up is pretty much transparent to the driver.

As for the Lexus comment about turbos, perhaps they will be moving to a world where perhaps half of the total horsepower can come from the hybrid motors under full-throttle (but temporary) conditions. Lots of power but only for 30 seconds or so. Plenty for passing; not so much for climbing Pikes Peak.

One additional thought: I am not a tree-hugger and didn't buy the RX hybrid to save the planet--I just thought it was brilliant technology meant to address the weaknesses of ICE operation. What I have concluded is that I most enjoy shift-free driving. The ICE and a big motor/generator share a planetary gearset such that the computer can tell the motor to spin forwards or backwards in order to put the ICE at an appropriate rpm for power needs at that instant. So no need for a bunch of gears to provide fixed ratios. Nowadays when I drive a conventional car I am aware of the constant hunt-and-peck of the powertrain, upshifting and downshifting to try to find a good rpm for the ICE for the moment. Downright primitive.

Last edited by riredale; Jul 18, 2019 at 07:39 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2019 | 07:40 AM
  #21  
webra's Avatar
webra
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 360
Likes: 6
From: SG
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
The current IS should have been offered with a hybrid option in the U.S.
I view much of this announcement as Lexus playing catch up or just stating what many other manufacturers have already stated. What I rather hear and see is them change direction with their front-end styling. The reverse angle, gaping mouth grille is harsh and passe.
Also, wouldn't adding start/stop technology be a quick and easy way to improve fuel economy? It seems many/most luxury brands already implement this in a mostly successful way.
The IS300h was always less likely to succeed in the US. It is too slow, and the powertrain responds to the throttle like the last gen Prius. And there was some rumour that the boot floor mounted battery was incompatible with some regulations. It’s a very noisy powertrain when accelerating even moderately hard. The car itself is quite good, but this type of hybrid powertrain would have only frustrated keen drivers who wanted to exploit its excellent rwd handling and 50/50 weight distribution.

BMW hybrids on the other hand, is using a version of the excellent ZF 8 speed gearbox developed with hybrid drive in mind by replacing the torque converter with a powerful motor.

Recently i I drove the BMW G30 320d. That is a diesel powered car. It’s does 0-60 around 6 seconds vs the 8.5 of the Lexus hybrid. But its not at all about the actual performance figure. It was the silent V8 like thrust accelerating to join the autobahn that inspired me to find out how fast it was claimed to be.

Is Lexus, the hybrid leader, falling behind? Not sure but not waiting around to find out.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2019 | 09:02 AM
  #22  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,460
Likes: 232
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by riredale
And the idle-stop idea is just a stepping-stone on the way to full hybridization, where the "starter" motor is built into the powertrain, not engaging and disengaging in the traditional fashion. The 3.5L ICE on my RX is started and stopped many dozens of times even in the course of a short trip to the market, and since the starting is done by a beefy motor/generator driven by circuits delivering 600v, the spinning-up is pretty much transparent to the driver.

As for the Lexus comment about turbos, perhaps they will be moving to a world where perhaps half of the total horsepower can come from the hybrid motors under full-throttle (but temporary) conditions. Lots of power but only for 30 seconds or so. Plenty for passing; not so much for climbing Pikes Peak.

One additional thought: I am not a tree-hugger and didn't buy the RX hybrid to save the planet--I just thought it was brilliant technology meant to address the weaknesses of ICE operation. What I have concluded is that I most enjoy shift-free driving. The ICE and a big motor/generator share a planetary gearset such that the computer can tell the motor to spin forwards or backwards in order to put the ICE at an appropriate rpm for power needs at that instant. So no need for a bunch of gears to provide fixed ratios. Nowadays when I drive a conventional car I am aware of the constant hunt-and-peck of the powertrain, upshifting and downshifting to try to find a good rpm for the ICE for the moment. Downright primitive.
Hence the popularity of EVs. The throttle response is so instant, all ICEs feel like dinosaurs.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2019 | 05:24 AM
  #23  
GNS's Avatar
GNS
Intermediate
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 345
Likes: 95
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by baconRx
I'm ok with the lower power, but it needs to come at a lower premium. 10k premium for the GS should have been 450hp to get it up to par with the 550i. but no...lexus always has to be behind on the power. like how everyone 's top end v6 engines from 10 years ago are all now up at least to 350 yet the most lexus can muster is 311hp with slightly better mpg ratings. I am looking forward to the new interiors but am doubtful about the powertrains coming anytime soon
There are seven competitors that have, or will have, turbo 6 cylinder powered mid range sedans. M340i, S4, C43, Q50 Red Sport, G70, CT5-V and TLX Type-S. The IS350 can no longer keep up and is in dire need of a full model change. It's fine if the IS-F doesn't come back right now, at least until they have their turbo V8 ready, but the mid range is where Lexus really needs to wake up.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
15
Apr 10, 2018 01:07 AM
Mister Two
Car Chat
8
Oct 12, 2010 09:05 AM
LexFather
Car Chat
3
Nov 2, 2009 11:52 PM
Overclocker
Car Chat
4
Jul 30, 2007 12:03 PM
costanza
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
1
Sep 16, 2005 05:50 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:55 PM.