When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Been meaning to mention this and see what anybody knows. When visiting relatives in Brooklyn, of course, we see tons of NYC T&LC plates everywhere. Driving, parked, I mean everywhere.
Maybe 1-2 mos ago, literally when I posted about the Hyundai Santa Fe turn signals being too low, we have been infested with NYC T&LC plates all over Phila., and even in my own neighborhood, which is 9 miles from downtown Center City. They are cruising for and carrying fares. What's going on? If I had to guess, these vehicles belong to Lyft. Why should they not be paying registration fees to our area? What's the angle?
Same here--over the past few weeks, I've seen at least a half-dozen '19 Santa Fes with NY TL&C plates in the Phila area. Odd.
Well considering Uber's drivers are their customers and not employees it's more of a boycott than a strike. Regardless, the percentage the driver gets for each ride is very substantial compared to what the company gets.
What the driver "gets" is revenue, not profit. If the drivers "got" a lot, they wouldn't be protesting. But, there's nothing stopping them from finding other employment elsewhere--they aren't under any contract.
Same here--over the past few weeks, I've seen at least a half-dozen '19 Santa Fes with NY TL&C plates in the Phila area. Odd.
What I suspect is it's not that easy for us to go up there (NYC) and start operating a car service, but we must have some loopholes allowing them to come down here. We need to close up those holes unless they want to argue we're filling a need you guys can't, we're helping you. We need to get smarter about keeping revenue down here...in our own area...it kills me when you see some project in PA, and the tags on all the commercial vehicles are NJ.
What the driver "gets" is revenue, not profit. If the drivers "got" a lot, they wouldn't be protesting. But, there's nothing stopping them from finding other employment elsewhere--they aren't under any contract.
I'm not saying they get a lot of money but those driving services get a very small piece of the fee. The only way to increase the fee for the driver is to increase the fee for the rider. You cannot squeeze the company any more because they are not making any money at all but what do I know, I only read financial statements for a living. Do you know what cut these driver services get? Go ahead and read the S-1 now that it is public information.
I'm not saying they get a lot of money but those driving services get a very small piece of the fee. The only way to increase the fee for the driver is to increase the fee for the rider. You cannot squeeze the company any more because they are not making any money at all but what do I know, I only read financial statements for a living. Do you know what cut these driver services get? Go ahead and read the S-1 now that it is public information.
Don't worry--fare increases are definitely on the horizon for this business model to be sustainable.
Yeah it's pretty simple......I wouldn't want to ruin my car (or at the very least pack tons of miles on it) at the expense of giving strangers rides for peanuts, either.
Uber and Lyft do not pay enough to be worth it for many drivers. You put miles on the car, burn gas, have more wear and tear, etc. None of that stuff is made up for by the amount they pay. In addition, with the new tax law changes, it might not even be worth it to itemize the miles, expenses, etc. because the standard deduction is so massive now.
Just to be clear, the change in the standard deduction has nothing to do with whether or not an Uber or Lyft driver itemizes their expenses. Uber and Lyft drivers are paid on a 1099, so they are self employed. Self employed people itemize business deductions (which would include vehicle, fuel, maintenance, etc) on a Schedule C and then their net income after their expenses is calculated as income where their personal deductions would apply
Just to be clear, the change in the standard deduction has nothing to do with whether or not an Uber or Lyft driver itemizes their expenses. Uber and Lyft drivers are paid on a 1099, so they are self employed. Self employed people itemize business deductions (which would include vehicle, fuel, maintenance, etc) on a Schedule C and then their net income after their expenses is calculated as income where their personal deductions would apply
Yeah okay. But if you file jointly, like my wife and I do, good luck having enough deductions for it to be worth the time.
Also, Lyft doesn't provide any sort of year-end summary or tax forms, which makes matters worse.
I'm kinda curious as why taxis never implemented (or do they?) an app like uber/lyft?
This is mostly why are they getting killed.
My city's main taxi provider launched an app about 6 months after Uber showed up here. But they still struggle, and actually they just (last week) announced a partnership with Uber to be the sole provider of the "UberTaxi" network. I don't think the lack of an app is "mostly" why they were getting crushed. In my opinion, taxis got crushed because they offered a horrible experience (old cars, rude drivers, poor car conditions) at a premium price. To take a taxi from the airport to my house costs me $65. An Uber is $32 to $36. A town car is $80 including gratuity. Why would I ever choose a taxi?
Also, Lyft doesn't provide any sort of year-end summary or tax forms, which makes matters worse.
I would've guessed that would be summarized in the app for the driver - providing an up-to-date view of how much they have made in a given time period (weekly/monthly/yearly).