2019 Mazda CX-5 debuts with turbocharged engine
#17
Lexus Test Driver
These sell extremely well here in northern L.A. suburbs. One dealer takes care of an entire valley. Personally would never consider one though. Front overhang is ludicrous and the dash has some dated shapes.
#18
Lexus Champion
I fail to understand how adding a turbocharger to a mediocre (i.e. ordinary, merely average) engine and crossover will suddenly make it the best in class. If the CX-5 is not selling, when other Japanese automaker compact crossovers such as the CR-V, RAV4 and Rogue are selling so well, there must be something wrong with it.
This seems to be a prime example of "Turbo Everything" as one of the worst car trends in modern cars and trucks.
This seems to be a prime example of "Turbo Everything" as one of the worst car trends in modern cars and trucks.
#19
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
it has nothing to do with respect... pricing vs space vs comfort vs other things that average customer wants/needs.
I would always buy CX-5 over Rav4 or CRV... but obviously not an majority of the market, and also new Rav4 while still nowhere as pretty as CX-5, is still stylish and nice inside a has a ton of space.
I would always buy CX-5 over Rav4 or CRV... but obviously not an majority of the market, and also new Rav4 while still nowhere as pretty as CX-5, is still stylish and nice inside a has a ton of space.
I fail to understand how adding a turbocharger to a mediocre (i.e. ordinary, merely average) engine and crossover will suddenly make it the best in class. If the CX-5 is not selling, when other Japanese automaker compact crossovers such as the CR-V, RAV4 and Rogue are selling so well, there must be something wrong with it.
This seems to be a prime example of "Turbo Everything" as one of the worst car trends in modern cars and trucks.
This seems to be a prime example of "Turbo Everything" as one of the worst car trends in modern cars and trucks.
#20
#21
Racer
iTrader: (5)
I personally think the CX-5 is packaged and priced well again I don't see as much of them around here most don't seem to even consider them an option hence my respect comment. Looks are subjective some like the simple look of the CX-5 while some like the busy look of the CR-V.
The Skyactiv-G engine has proven it's reliability in a few different Mazdas, and the 2.5T is just the Skyactiv-G with a turbo. It's been offered on every trim on the 2016+ CX-9, and there have been no issues with it, or with the 2018 6. Integrating it into the CX-5 should be a cakewalk.
On top of that, the CX-5 has always outperformed the competition when it comes to handling, but the majority of SUV, CUV, and crossover drivers aren't interested in handling. Most likely prefer a softer, cushy ride. Yet another reason why Mazda isn't as popular, their offerings usually tend to appeal to the driving enthusiast instead of the typical commuter.
#22
Lexus Champion
Mazda has always done their own thing when you compare them to Toyota and Honda. They've never been a mass market seller and they've always appealed to sporty drivers. CX-5 has simple clean lines and a pinned down front end. If you want an overstyled, busy looking appliance you go buy the CRV or the RAV4. Turbo option is a great development on the CX.
#23
Lexus Fanatic
I fail to understand how adding a turbocharger to a mediocre (i.e. ordinary, merely average) engine and crossover will suddenly make it the best in class. If the CX-5 is not selling, when other Japanese automaker compact crossovers such as the CR-V, RAV4 and Rogue are selling so well, there must be something wrong with it.
This seems to be a prime example of "Turbo Everything" as one of the worst car trends in modern cars and trucks.
This seems to be a prime example of "Turbo Everything" as one of the worst car trends in modern cars and trucks.
Adding a turbocharger will make a huge difference. It will be more responsive with more low end torque. NA 4 cyl engines struggle, the turbo will do away with the struggling.
Turbo everything is here to stay. Its a fuel saving measure, turbo 4 instead of a V6.
#24
Lexus Champion
Its already best in class. Its not the best SELLING, but I've driven them all as my cousin just bought in this segment and I helped him, the CX-5 is what *I* would buy, for sure. Mazdas are never going to sell as well as a comparable Honda or Toyota, Mazda doesn't need them to.
Adding a turbocharger will make a huge difference. It will be more responsive with more low end torque. NA 4 cyl engines struggle, the turbo will do away with the struggling.
Turbo everything is here to stay. Its a fuel saving measure, turbo 4 instead of a V6.
Adding a turbocharger will make a huge difference. It will be more responsive with more low end torque. NA 4 cyl engines struggle, the turbo will do away with the struggling.
Turbo everything is here to stay. Its a fuel saving measure, turbo 4 instead of a V6.
And I must disagree with you that "Mazda doesn't need them to". Mazda does indeed need them to. Mass market consumer products, including cars and including the Mazda CX-5, are made to be sold; and if they are not sold, it holds back the manufacturer. It has prevented Mazda from building more and better product due to a lack of funds. Those missing better products are holding Mazda back from becoming a better and more sought-after automaker. And it is known that Mazda is in trouble.
Finally, I believe that turbocharging is a cheap, quick and easy way to add power; it is so technologically easy and so easy to game the fuel efficiency measurement systems that I believe some automakers are not putting enough effort into developing more efficient drivetrains, including super-efficient internal combustion engines.
#25
Lexus Fanatic
I kinda agree. Lots of people say that would buy something, but sales don’t back it up. Mazda products have an unlimited warranty in Canada, they still can’t sell it.
#27
Racer
iTrader: (5)
So many people have said "It is the SUV I would buy", but you did not buy it, neither did the other person nor that other person. So what is the point if so many people say they would buy it but so few people actually do buy it?
And I must disagree with you that "Mazda doesn't need them to". Mazda does indeed need them to. Mass market consumer products, including cars and including the Mazda CX-5, are made to be sold; and if they are not sold, it holds back the manufacturer. It has prevented Mazda from building more and better product due to a lack of funds. Those missing better products are holding Mazda back from becoming a better and more sought-after automaker. And it is known that Mazda is in trouble.
And I must disagree with you that "Mazda doesn't need them to". Mazda does indeed need them to. Mass market consumer products, including cars and including the Mazda CX-5, are made to be sold; and if they are not sold, it holds back the manufacturer. It has prevented Mazda from building more and better product due to a lack of funds. Those missing better products are holding Mazda back from becoming a better and more sought-after automaker. And it is known that Mazda is in trouble.
Regardless, Mazda has been showing steady growth over the years.
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/mazda-canada-reports-sales-for-december-and-full-year-2017-667941223.html
https://www.automotiveworld.com/news-releases/global-sales-mazda-posts-third-straight-record-year/
Honda has also shown steady growth, but that's no surprise as I personally feel that a lot of their sales come from brand loyalty. Something to note: Pilot sales are down 10+% this year, while CX-9 sales reported an increase of over 50% in 2017.
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/honda-canada-reports-record-breaking-may-sales-684320461.html
I'm hoping Mazda's partnership with Toyota sets them up well financially over the next few years. Maybe then, Mazda will bring back the Mazdaspeed line.
EDIT: I test drove a CX-9, Pilot, Grand Cherokee, 4runner, Santa Fe and Sorento when I was shopping. CX-9 outperformed all of them in the areas I was most interested in (ride quality, interior/exterior quality and design, and to a lesser extent, mileage), and that's why I bought it. Easy decision for me. Seems that a lot of CR-V owners are switching over to the CX-5 as well.
Last edited by sm1ke; 11-18-18 at 07:41 PM.
#28
Lexus Fanatic
And I must disagree with you that "Mazda doesn't need them to". Mazda does indeed need them to. Mass market consumer products, including cars and including the Mazda CX-5, are made to be sold; and if they are not sold, it holds back the manufacturer. It has prevented Mazda from building more and better product due to a lack of funds. Those missing better products are holding Mazda back from becoming a better and more sought-after automaker. And it is known that Mazda is in trouble.
Finally, I believe that turbocharging is a cheap, quick and easy way to add power; it is so technologically easy and so easy to game the fuel efficiency measurement systems that I believe some automakers are not putting enough effort into developing more efficient drivetrains, including super-efficient internal combustion engines.
Drive a turbo 4 and a NA 4 and tell me which you'd rather have lol.
#29
Lexus Fanatic
You brought up enthusiast, best in class, as well as what most people want which is mediocre. You ended up leasing an end of generation model that is definitely not best in class. Then you got a Pacifica which is competitive. You imply you want the best in class model. Mazda is definitely not best in class.
Last edited by Toys4RJill; 11-19-18 at 08:42 AM.
#30
Lexus Champion
No need to get argumentative. I never said it was anything but my opinion.
To use your excuse, I am not in the market for a turbo-charged vehicle.
To use your excuse, I am not in the market for a turbo-charged vehicle.