When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I don't really think an S-Class is intimidating. Is it one of the most desirable cars in the world to own? You bet. The benchmark for flagship luxury sedans? Absolutely.
But it's pretty conservatively styled, definitely handsome but I wouldn't consider intimidating. I think a new Escalade is much more intimidating than an S-Class. Or any large, full sized BOF SUV that's styled right. A Yukon Denali XL is more intimidating than an S-Class to my eyes. I know it's absolutely crazy to say this as a certified car enthusiast (and someone whose favorite car is the W140), but I would honestly struggle between a 'Slade and an S-Class if I had the choice of either. Escalade just has a presence that virtually no other car matches plus it's a truck/practical/etc.
I live in a very truck-heavy area and like trucks a lot FWIW.
Maybe having the word "intimidating" is not the best choice for my thread. Instead, maybe I should have titled it "What deters those who can afford an S class from buying it?"
We all know the S class goes for more than the LS when they're new - and we know the S class depreciates more. So at quick glance on eBay looking for lightly used cars of same year and similar mileage:
2016 S 550 w/ 28k miles is listed for $6k more than a 2016 LS460 with 30k miles.
2015 S 550 w/ 15K miles is listed for $5k more than a 2015 LS460 with 15k miles.
If you are a CPO buyer and know you'll have repairs covered for 3-4 years and plan to get rid of the car when the CPO expires... you're looking at a very minimal difference to go S class. You know you're getting a more expensive car. Yet I still think a decent number of people would pass on the S class. The responses through the thread have been interesting and pretty wide-ranging.
Probably intimidating because it's the benchmark for any full sized luxury sedan (not counting the mega expensive Rolls Royce and Bentley). Mercedes is known for the S class. All the little models they make don't really mean anything. In my opinion, the S class makes the brand.
Lexus was on the right path with the LS when they tried mimicking the S class formula back in the day, but they dropped the ball with the LS500 with its questionable styling, bad visibility, Camaro-like pillars that you hit your head on when entering and exiting the vehicle, questionable reliability with the new motor, etc. The new LS is not exactly selling well at all. I think they will lose a ton of their original customers because they keep messing with these hit-or-miss designs. Mercedes is smart, they don't mess around with their best car just like Porsche does not mess around with the proven 911 formula. Lexus needs to take note.
Lexus was on the right path with the LS when they tried mimicking the S class formula back in the day, but they dropped the ball with the LS500 with its questionable styling, bad visibility, Camaro-like pillars that you hit your head on when entering and exiting the vehicle, questionable reliability with the new motor, etc. The new LS is not exactly selling well at all. I think they will lose a ton of their original customers because they keep messing with these hit-or-miss designs. Mercedes is smart, they don't mess around with their best car just like Porsche does not mess around with the proven 911 formula. Lexus needs to take note.
This is spot on. I have no desire to ever own an LS500, and wouldn't even consider one if I were in that market. I'd pay extra for the Mercedes. I think the new LS is a disaster, honestly.
I’ll be the odd man out here. Whenever I see an S Class, I think to myself “I just don’t get it”. I just find it to be so incredibly unattractive. The droopy rear end just kills it for me. Ugh. Flame suit on and ready...
I’ll be the odd man out here. Whenever I see an S Class, I think to myself “I just don’t get it”. I just find it to be so incredibly unattractive. The droopy rear end just kills it for me. Ugh. Flame suit on and ready...
It totally depends on the spec. The AMG exterior package makes a big difference in the car, its expensive though ($5k). Even with the regular exterior trim, wheels are incredibly important to how the car looks. They look TERRIBLE on the base 18" wheels. Its amazing how a set of their 19s or especially 20s transforms the car...
This is spot on. I have no desire to ever own an LS500, and wouldn't even consider one if I were in that market. I'd pay extra for the Mercedes. I think the new LS is a disaster, honestly.
Not sure if I would say it’s a disaster. The worldwide sales numbers are what matters. The new LS was definitely made for world markets. I could totally see Lexus almost abandoning the LS for the USA with small volumes whereas the ES takes the bulk of the sales. I watched the launch video presentation of the ES, Lexus claims the median household income of the. ES is around $250K or around there. The ES f sport is something like $175K. So where does LS fit in? Definitely up market
Median income for the ES of $250k? That’s a lot, but I know a lot of non car people high income folks who have them so maybe that makes sense.
Yes. I would have to go back and double check. It’s on you tube on my Apple TV where the Lexus executive addresses the journalists or whomever was in what looked like a hotel conference room
edit. My error. I was incorrect. ES Average house income $150K and married. $140K for F sport.
Last edited by Toys4RJill; Aug 1, 2018 at 07:47 AM.
I’ll be the odd man out here. Whenever I see an S Class, I think to myself “I just don’t get it”. I just find it to be so incredibly unattractive. The droopy rear end just kills it for me. Ugh. Flame suit on and ready...
Count me in as well. I don't get it. Merc tries to think differently and shapely and the wealthy still gobble it up. Even the Boxy G-Wagons look ugly enough to make a statement. Finally they try to update the tech and interiors to match the price it commands. It simply exudes I've got bling and cash and dont care if it cost $5k or $10k for a maintenance expenses.
BMW stands for bring more wallet
Merc wants more of it, regardless of the looks. That is all.
It takes 3 companies for a real tango of a ultra luxury status.... it's been around for a long time ( BWW Merc and Audi). They can feed off each other until the market stagnates. The image problem of kicking the expensive cars down the curb to those who cant afford it will leave a lasting mark -- never again I will buy one of these cars. There is absolutely no long term value proposition for these hot potato cars. That said, cars are a depreciating asset. You drive what you're able to afford to throw away. S class means you can throw a lot more $$ away than others and not blink an eye. No wonder it bothers some people simply because they have $$ and you do not.
Maybe having the word "intimidating" is not the best choice for my thread. Instead, maybe I should have titled it "What deters those who can afford an S class from buying it?".
Using the word “intimidating” was the absolute best term to use for a lively discussion. Had you chosen another term I doubt this thread would’ve seen several hundred responses. Remember, the key to a successful thread lays within the title of said thread. You need trigger words, a little mystery, and possibly a sprinkle of trolling questions to spark interest and debate.
Maybe having the word "intimidating" is not the best choice for my thread. Instead, maybe I should have titled it "What deters those who can afford an S class from buying it?"
Yep, that's a better word. However, that word did garnish a lot of interesting responses.
Depending on your demographics, I will agree with Steve that if you're in sales and driving around in an S class or any flagship car for matter, your buyer/clients can see that as a turn-off when/if you're not giving them a good deal.
Originally Posted by JDR76
I’ll be the odd man out here. Whenever I see an S Class, I think to myself “I just don’t get it”. I just find it to be so incredibly unattractive. The droopy rear end just kills it for me. Ugh. Flame suit on and ready...
Pass me the flame suit also.
I hate it also since the German designs are too lazy with their S-M-L sausage length.
However, I will give the S class a huge thumbs up on the interior design/materials
This is spot on. I have no desire to ever own an LS500, and wouldn't even consider one if I were in that market. I'd pay extra for the Mercedes. I think the new LS is a disaster, honestly.
Unfortunately I feel the same way. I was actually hoping the new LS would be a hit so it would lower the price of used LS's more and put more used LS's on the market but I think many owners have decided to keep their LS460's after seeing the new LS500.
Not sure if I would say it’s a disaster. The worldwide sales numbers are what matters. The new LS was definitely made for world markets. I could totally see Lexus almost abandoning the LS for the USA with small volumes whereas the ES takes the bulk of the sales. I watched the launch video presentation of the ES, Lexus claims the median household income of the. ES is around $250K or around there. The ES f sport is something like $175K. So where does LS fit in? Definitely up market
Definitely not that way in the US. Even for a LS I don't think the median income is anywhere near 250K. I know plenty of people who have LS's that make less then 100K a year, same with GS and especially ES and RX buyers where many center middle class buy and own them.
Maybe having the word "intimidating" is not the best choice for my thread. Instead, maybe I should have titled it "What deters those who can afford an S class from buying it?"
We all know the S class goes for more than the LS when they're new - and we know the S class depreciates more. So at quick glance on eBay looking for lightly used cars of same year and similar mileage:
2016 S 550 w/ 28k miles is listed for $6k more than a 2016 LS460 with 30k miles.
2015 S 550 w/ 15K miles is listed for $5k more than a 2015 LS460 with 15k miles.
If you are a CPO buyer and know you'll have repairs covered for 3-4 years and plan to get rid of the car when the CPO expires... you're looking at a very minimal difference to go S class. You know you're getting a more expensive car. Yet I still think a decent number of people would pass on the S class. The responses through the thread have been interesting and pretty wide-ranging.
I haven't been able to read through all of the 350+ comments but I have considered the S class several times. I passed on it because of the reliability issues I've read about. I hear they are better than they used to be but I don't think quite as reliable as an LS460 and my LS430s were. Yes you get a warranty but I don't want to keep going to the dealer for little things all the time. Its still an inconvenience going there and getting a loaner. Plus I probably would have leased one(I will admit I didn't look into buying one) and at $1200+ a month for the one I wanted I would have been pissed every time I had to drive around a loaner C300 for a few days. After 2 LS430's and one LS460L, I have enjoyed never having to visit the dealer any other time except for routine mileage services every 5,000 miles on all 3 cars.
I did buy a CLS550 as a fun car. It has cost more to maintain than the LS460 thus far and their CPO warranty isn't as comprehensive as Lexus but it has been pretty reliable thus far. I may look into an S class in the future.
As far at the looks I guess it depends on your location. Come to Boca Raton and they are about as common as a Honda. If there aren't over 100 of them in my neighborhood then there are 200. They are that common and people drive them around without worry or garnering much attention.