Lexus Fanatic
Quote:
I believe most areas, speeds maximums are set with the 85% percentile in mind. Thus it is one of the factors in setting a speed limit. This is what I have seen. I could be wrong, but I did learn about the 85% and quite a bit from this thread, I don’t most people care to know about it. Originally Posted by theory816
Type in Google your state and search for the drivers manual. Download the pdf and let me know if it speaks about the 85%. Not all state are the same but I'm fairly certain that it will tell you to drive at the speed limit unless the weather or other factors influences the speed. Still, nothing about the 85 mentioned.
Lead Lap
To all of you who say u don't speed: the MMPI, a psych test, has this as one of their gazillion questions. If you responded 'no to the question of speeding, well, we know who u are and we know u r fibbing.
Bottom line, everybody speeds at 1 point or another. A 1990s study concluded that if we all followed the speed limit it would be perpetual gridlock.
Remember, It's only a suggestion, unless u get caught!
Bottom line, everybody speeds at 1 point or another. A 1990s study concluded that if we all followed the speed limit it would be perpetual gridlock.
Remember, It's only a suggestion, unless u get caught!
Quote:
Hmmm. Hard to imagine gridlock at 55 MPH. Originally Posted by MedicalDoc
T A 1990s study concluded that if we all followed the speed limit it would be perpetual gridlock.
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
close
May 22, 2026
- Join DateApr 2012
- LocationLong Island
- Posts:6,246
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:281
-
Liked:472 Times in 341 Posts
Quote:
not being able to exceed 55 sounds like gridlock to meOriginally Posted by mmarshall
Hmmm. Hard to imagine gridlock at 55 MPH.
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
close
May 22, 2026
- Join DateApr 2012
- LocationLong Island
- Posts:6,246
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:281
-
Liked:472 Times in 341 Posts
Quote:
i don't want to "speed," the speed I feel comfortable driving at on an interstate just usually tends to be above what the law says. if I'm in the crown vic I'll most likely be going slower than with the other two. and if I see a straight stretch of open highway with good road conditions while I'm in the E55 and I feel like doing a quick 60-100 or so, (only takes about 4 seconds) there's a good likelihood I'll want to capitalize on that. it's not out of a desire to break the law, but if I can have some fun in my 500 hp autobahn machine without putting others at risk, there's a decent chance I won't let the opportunity go to waste. unless I've only been driving for a few minutes and the oil is still cold, then I'm taking it easy Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
My biggest takeaway from this thread is that it seems like people want to speed and do not like driving the speed limit for IMO, reasons that they just don’t know how or can’t becuase they have no patience or no discipline. I do see some evidence regarding the idea that flow of speed is important and is somewhat related to safety and I have recently been more aware of the left lane going 10-15 MPH over the speed limit while the other lanes are closer to the speed limit. However, nothing suggests to me that going the speed limit and following the rules of the road is in fact unsafe. There are a lot of interpretations and variables involved.
Quote:
I believe most areas, speeds maximums are set with the 85% percentile in mind. Thus it is one of the factors in setting a speed limit. This is what I have seen. I could be wrong, but I did learn about the 85% and quite a bit from this thread, I don’t most people care to know about it.
Maybe so, but the manual does not mention anything about it so one does not need to bother with it. I went ahead and looked through Maryland's drivers manual. Much of it reinforces most of what I've touched on in this thread.Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I believe most areas, speeds maximums are set with the 85% percentile in mind. Thus it is one of the factors in setting a speed limit. This is what I have seen. I could be wrong, but I did learn about the 85% and quite a bit from this thread, I don’t most people care to know about it.
This is directly from the manual, "It is safest to drive at the same speed that most traffic is moving, up to the maximum speed limit. In fact, traveling at a speed lower than other traffic encourages other vehicles to constantly pass you and increases the chances of a crash.
But even if you are going slower within the allowed limits, others people's crashes are not of your fault. In fact, if someone rear ends you, it will almost always be the others person fault because they did not keep a proper distance.
Quote:
This is directly from the manual, "It is safest to drive at the same speed that most traffic is moving, up to the maximum speed limit. In fact, traveling at a speed lower than other traffic encourages other vehicles to constantly pass you and increases the chances of a crash.
But even if you are going slower within the allowed limits, others people's crashes are not of your fault. In fact, if someone rear ends you, it will almost always be the others person fault because they did not keep a proper distance.
Personally, I'm close to agreeing with you (not totally), but the state in its Drivers' Manual, cannot officially endorse the fact that the majority of traffic on the Interstates goes past the limit, even though it is technically illegal to do so. That would be the state officially endorsing speeding....which it simply cannot do.Originally Posted by theory816
Maybe so, but the manual does not mention anything about it so one does not need to bother with it. I went ahead and looked through Maryland's drivers manual. Much of it reinforces most of what I've touched on in this thread.This is directly from the manual, "It is safest to drive at the same speed that most traffic is moving, up to the maximum speed limit. In fact, traveling at a speed lower than other traffic encourages other vehicles to constantly pass you and increases the chances of a crash.
But even if you are going slower within the allowed limits, others people's crashes are not of your fault. In fact, if someone rear ends you, it will almost always be the others person fault because they did not keep a proper distance.
That is why they use the term...."Up to the Maximum Speed Limit". They cannot officially endorse anything over that.
Like I said, I basically (but not totally) agree with you. I usually don't go more than about 5 MPH or so over the limit myself....and I'm probably slow by Car Chat standards LOL.
Lexus Fanatic
Quote:
This is directly from the manual, "It is safest to drive at the same speed that most traffic is moving, up to the maximum speed limit. In fact, traveling at a speed lower than other traffic encourages other vehicles to constantly pass you and increases the chances of a crash.
But even if you are going slower within the allowed limits, others people's crashes are not of your fault. In fact, if someone rear ends you, it will almost always be the others person fault because they did not keep a proper distance.
I agree with. But I also believe there is some interpretation issues with some comments in this thread as well, some clear defining of what people mean could help. . I dont generally drive past the speed limit very much, but when I take longer commutes I sure do. But I for myself have never felt unless drving the speed limit. I also see the POV of the flow of traffic etc etc. I also don’t think your trolling at all. I will say that perhaps there is evidence that some people do not how or just don’t have the discipline to drive the actual speed limit.Originally Posted by theory816
Maybe so, but the manual does not mention anything about it so one does not need to bother with it. I went ahead and looked through Maryland's drivers manual. Much of it reinforces most of what I've touched on in this thread.This is directly from the manual, "It is safest to drive at the same speed that most traffic is moving, up to the maximum speed limit. In fact, traveling at a speed lower than other traffic encourages other vehicles to constantly pass you and increases the chances of a crash.
But even if you are going slower within the allowed limits, others people's crashes are not of your fault. In fact, if someone rear ends you, it will almost always be the others person fault because they did not keep a proper distance.
I think your thread question and what engineers believe what the speed should be are sort of like some sort of paradox.
Quote:
I'm not convinced that even engineers can all come to a consensus as to what is considered speeding on any given stretch of road and what isn't. That's why I pay little attention to these so-called "studies" by so-called "experts". Half a century of safe driving has taught me that my own judgement of what is sensible and what isn't has generally done me well (and avoid tickets). Part of it, too, is that both my parents instilled safe driving techniques in me as a teen-ager....time has also verified that.Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I think your thread question and what engineers believe what the speed should be are sort of like some sort of paradox.
Lexus Fanatic
I like to read the scholarly studies on many subjects. That is how I was educated. I also like to hear about expect opinions and I am fascinated with how we determine or qualify someone as an expect. That said, I have heard about the 85th percentile and I think there is great validity in that. However, I also immediately question the notion that a multi-lane highway is traveling at greater speeds than the limit at all times 24/7 (if that was what was implied). Note, I am not trying to start a flame here. What I would like to hear is if highway engineers actually use traffic calming measures on purpose, for example, as you leave the GTA and head towards the US border, the QEW (a highway) goes from 3 lanes to 3 lanes+HOV down to 3 Lanes and then splits to 2 lanes left/US 2lanes right Hamilton and then both become 5 laned and 3 lanes respectively. This all happens within 10-15 miles. All at 100km per hour. Many many lanes exiting on/off the highway and out of the HOV at every exit. So it interesting to know what engineers plan.
Quote:
Agreed that studies certainly have their place...and are done for a reason. But my earlier point was that there are also times when there is no substitute for one's own judgement and/or sheer common sense. One does not need an engineer to tell us that we should not be doing the speed limit, for example, in thick fog, snow, or ice, until roads are treated or visibilty improved.Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I like to read the scholarly studies on many subjects. That is how I was educated. I also like to hear about expect opinions and I am fascinated with how we determine or qualify someone as an expect. That said, I have heard about the 85th percentile and I think there is great validity in that.
Quote:
What you're saying is we shouldn't do anything to avoid being involved in a collision, because the other person will be at fault, so it doesn't matter that it happens. This is what I refer to as being "dead right". Much like using a crosswalk when there's a truck barreling down the street. It's ok that you get splattered all over the pavement, because you had the right of way and the truck was supposed to stop.Originally Posted by theory816
But even if you are going slower within the allowed limits, others people's crashes are not of your fault. In fact, if someone rear ends you, it will almost always be the others person fault because they did not keep a proper distance.
arentz07
Moderator
close
Yesterday
- Join DateNov 2016
- LocationGA
- Posts:9,606
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:5,602
-
Liked:4,788 Times in 2,371 Posts
Quote:
Yeah. My wife got into a very low-speed collision with someone because they didn't pull all the way into the turning lane to turn left. Luckily, there was no damage to either vehicle (just a small scratch, but they opted to just let it be), but imagine if there was damage. It would have been my wife's fault, even though the other car's rear end was hanging out into the lane she was in. Clearly, there was fault on both sides, but the other driver pretty much invited this to happen. Originally Posted by geko29
What you're saying is we shouldn't do anything to avoid being involved in a collision, because the other person will be at fault, so it doesn't matter that it happens. This is what I refer to as being "dead right". Much like using a crosswalk when there's a truck barreling down the street. It's ok that you get splattered all over the pavement, because you had the right of way and the truck was supposed to stop.
Just an anecdote of why that kind of thinking can be dangerous.
Quote:
Cool. Thanks for letting us know what you actually know about this entire thread, which almost absolutely nothing. And that analogy/comparison is terrible.Originally Posted by geko29
What you're saying is we shouldn't do anything to avoid being involved in a collision, because the other person will be at fault, so it doesn't matter that it happens. This is what I refer to as being "dead right". Much like using a crosswalk when there's a truck barreling down the street. It's ok that you get splattered all over the pavement, because you had the right of way and the truck was supposed to stop.
Quote:
Just an anecdote of why that kind of thinking can be dangerous.
Im not technically sure who's fault this would have been but your wife has something called brakes. If she kept a good following distance like she supposed to, she would have seen the rear tail sticking out and come to a slow stop, preventing others from rear ending her in the event of a sudden stop. Or she could've swerve around the rear end safely because she can see it from a mile away.Originally Posted by arentz07
Yeah. My wife got into a very low-speed collision with someone because they didn't pull all the way into the turning lane to turn left. Luckily, there was no damage to either vehicle (just a small scratch, but they opted to just let it be), but imagine if there was damage. It would have been my wife's fault, even though the other car's rear end was hanging out into the lane she was in. Clearly, there was fault on both sides, but the other driver pretty much invited this to happen.Just an anecdote of why that kind of thinking can be dangerous.
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
close
Yesterday
- Join DateMay 2012
- LocationMaryland
- Posts:68,631
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:1,557
-
Liked:4,045 Times in 3,010 Posts
Can we close this thread already?!