2018 J.D. Power Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS)
I examined a new C-HR not long ago, sitting on the lot, where the entire lower-dash plastic trim panel (which was almost paper-thin plastic to start with) had been misaligned and sprung during assembly. One end of it hung out into space, and partially covered the engine start/stop button. I tried to repair it myself, but couldn't...I didn't have my tool box with me.
I have frequently seen Buicks with driver and left-rear passenger doors terribly misaligned, so much so that I would be afraid that door seals would be misaligned and leak, yet Buick is constantly high up the reliability ratings, as you like to constantly point out.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Look, I'm not just picking on Toyota here. It is true that any new car can have defects.....but, in my experience, stuff like that today is rare. And Toyota prides itself on quality....so there's not a whole lot of excuse for it. Contrast that to what I saw from Chrysler Corporation in the late 1960s and early 70s....or, say, the GM X-Body cars and Pontiac Fiero of the early/mid-1980s. If I described those lemons to you, you would probably not believe it. You would have had to have seen those cars for yourself...and, of course, that's a topic for another thread.
Look, I'm not just picking on Toyota here. It is true that any new car can have defects.....but, in my experience, stuff like that today is rare. And Toyota prides itself on quality....so there's not a whole lot of excuse for it. Contrast that to what I saw from Chrysler Corporation in the late 1960s and early 70s....or, say, the GM X-Body cars and Pontiac Fiero of the early/mid-1980s. If I described those lemons to you, you would probably not believe it. You would have had to have seen those cars for yourself...and, of course, that's a topic for another thread.
Buicks aren't perfect. I never said that. I also said (if you've bothered to read my posts) that Buicks are often bought and driven by people who tend to drive conservatively and not put a lot of stress on engine, transmissions, suspensions, and brakes. Contrast that, of course, with many of those who drive V8 Mustangs.

With at least some reason. Like it or not, since Cadillac is decreasing in importance, it has (arguably) become the prime American-brand Lexus-competitor.....though Lincoln is making some major steps forward, especially with the Navigator.
Though, I'll admit....Lexus does a wider range of vehicles than Buick, and Buick has no direct competitor for some of them....for instance, the Lexus LS.
With Consumer Reports, the rebadged Opel-Buicks have significantly more reliable ratings than the Lacrosse and Enclave, though I notice that, with Buick, Consumer Reports seems to be up and down on the reliability...other vehicle brands tend to be more stable, either good or bad.
I give Buick more street cred than the others on here, almost everyone will tell you Buick is not a luxury brand. I think it is but I am not willing to say it is on the same level as a Lexus. Maybe an Acura. I would argue Lincoln is far closer to Lexus than Buick is.
Last edited by Toys4RJill; Feb 15, 2018 at 07:57 AM.
I'm honestly surprised that Mitsubishi is still in the American market. They are down to three basic products....and one of them, the Mirage, is basically a toy. Like Isuzi and Suzuki did before they left, They've let their dealership numbers sink down to next to nothing....you often have to travel quite a distance just to look at or test-drive their products. They didn't even show up at the D.C auto show...though, for that matter, Cadillac and Mercedes didn't either, and Mitsu did have a small display at Detroit.
You have complained, before, that I don't admit being wrong often enough. Well, Mitsubishi did surprise me. Several times now, I've commented that I'd be surprised if they lasted another year in the American market. Well, each year, so far, they have, indeed, managed to do it....at least on paper.














