Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Lexus LS500/LS500h

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 01:00 PM
  #106  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,844
Likes: 4,018
Default

the huge wheel gap and front end look on those video thumbnails really isn't doing it for me.

no doubt the car is a tech tour de force though with exquisite built quality and materials.

will watch 'em now.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 01:04 PM
  #107  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,747
Likes: 4,077
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Lexus2000
All you high and mighty "you don't know the difference between HP and torque!!!" people are probably the same ones that think only 0-60 times matter.
Not at all, I've repeatedly said I don't care about 0-60 times at all.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 01:12 PM
  #108  
peteharvey's Avatar
peteharvey
Lead Lap
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 552
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Rhambler
https://gearheads.org/the-lexus-is-2...h-of-the-328i/
Here you go. If force = acceleration, then the physics at Toyota is obviously broken. Like I said, these numbers are meaningless in the context of Toyota's car. Both.
Originally Posted by JDR76
In my opinion it's curb weight and transmissions that Toyota needs to work on. Of course a lighter weight car with a better transmission will accelerate faster than a heavier one with a less favorable transmission, even with the same output.
Yes, that article quoted by Rhambler points to weight being the issue.
It is weight that is keeping the IS200t behind on all four fronts including: acceleration, economy, braking and handling.
The current model 2012-19 3 Series uses its own dedicated platform, not shared with the 2010-17 5 Series, hence the current 3 Series is a very lightweight car.
Meanwhile, the current model 2014-21 C Class uses 48% aluminium content, hence 220 lbs lighter than its predecessor.
The current model 2015-22 A4 is 260 lbs lighter than its predecessor.
Lexus is desperately waiting for the next generation of 2018-25 5LS, 2019-26 5GS and 2020-27 4IS to arrive with new hi aluminium content lighter weight platforms, which have bearing on all four facets of acceleration, economy, braking and handling.

I wouldn't worry too much about V8's, extremes in HP and 0-60, nor worry about overly firm suspension & handling preferred by some - these factors are mainly aimed at the "niche" market, and sell in only small quantities.
The most important factors is still in the badge and styling, and that's why 5LS's rear quarter view really worries me for relative sales rates...
.

Last edited by peteharvey; Sep 16, 2017 at 01:21 PM.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 01:48 PM
  #109  
JDR76's Avatar
JDR76
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 1,889
From: WA
Default

Why are we having an IS discussion on the LS thread?
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 01:52 PM
  #110  
Rhambler's Avatar
Rhambler
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 17
From: CA
Default

I was trying to make a point that torque isn't indicative of 0-60 times, as someone else was insinuating that were idiots and don't understand torque and that the LS 500 will be as fast as the competition based on that torque.

Under normal circumstances, yes there's typically a correlation. In Toyota speak, not necessarily.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 01:55 PM
  #111  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,844
Likes: 4,018
Default

from first video...

f-sport has rear steering and 15.7" 6 piston front rotors
twice as stiff
best quote: "2 wheel drive, or rear wheel drive like God intended"
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 01:58 PM
  #112  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,844
Likes: 4,018
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
Why are we having an IS discussion on the LS thread?
agreed, rhambler post with smaller car comparison and engines etc deleted.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 02:02 PM
  #113  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,844
Likes: 4,018
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
the huge wheel gap...
i now see in second video that the car with air suspension will raise itself a bit over an inch when stopped to make it easier to get into and out of which may explain the look in that pic.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 02:27 PM
  #114  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,844
Likes: 4,018
Default

ok, red exterior in the second video is spectacular.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 02:35 PM
  #115  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,844
Likes: 4,018
Default

several irrelevant posts and posts with personal comments deleted. back on track guys please.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 02:40 PM
  #116  
JDR76's Avatar
JDR76
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 1,889
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
several irrelevant posts and posts with personal comments deleted. back on track guys please.
Thank you.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 02:50 PM
  #117  
Bogglo's Avatar
Bogglo
Rookie
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 56
Likes: 3
From: Ca
Default

Someone is pulling out a bird from the pocket, but yet the onlookers kept asking what's in the pocket?
August 26 is around the corner how about some patience till the embargo is lifted.

One thing we can all agree on is how good that price is. considering the amount of standard features on the base model.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 02:54 PM
  #118  
RXSF's Avatar
RXSF
CL Community Team
15 Year Member
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Builder
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,551
Likes: 230
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Now that we only have the "L" model and they are pricing at pretty much the previous gen swb model, the LS is a good deal. However, I have some dislike towards Lexus always being the value based proposition. I know to some degree, it always has been, but it will continue to stay out of true Tier 1 category by being the go to cheaper option. I dont want it to win comparisons because it is 20K cheaper than an S class. It needs to be as good or better, and I have no problem with it being priced in the mid 80s for that to happen.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 03:02 PM
  #119  
peteharvey's Avatar
peteharvey
Lead Lap
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 552
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by RXSF
Now that we only have the "L" model and they are pricing at pretty much the previous gen swb model, the LS is a good deal. However, I have some dislike towards Lexus always being the value based proposition. I know to some degree, it always has been, but it will continue to stay out of true Tier 1 category by being the go to cheaper option. I dont want it to win comparisons because it is 20K cheaper than an S class. It needs to be as good or better, and I have no problem with it being priced in the mid 80s for that to happen.
That's a great proposition, but to do so, they would have to style the 5LS rear quarter view a bit better.
Off the top of my head, I'd say that styling will be 5LS's biggest Achilles Heel.
By comparison, the LC coupe doesn't draw as much controversy in its styling.
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 03:19 PM
  #120  
Rhambler's Avatar
Rhambler
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 17
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by RXSF
Now that we only have the "L" model and they are pricing at pretty much the previous gen swb model, the LS is a good deal. However, I have some dislike towards Lexus always being the value based proposition. I know to some degree, it always has been, but it will continue to stay out of true Tier 1 category by being the go to cheaper option. I dont want it to win comparisons because it is 20K cheaper than an S class. It needs to be as good or better, and I have no problem with it being priced in the mid 80s for that to happen.
I don't think Lexus has a choice. Pricing this at $85k base MSRP wouldn't have good results in my opinion. I don't think it diminishes it, but that price would be a mistake.

If it doesn't want to be considered a "value" proposition, then it should offer the attributes that allows the others to charge more (like more engines, a base V8tt and a true F). Even if they don't sell as much, it's still an important benchmark. These things aren't ever meant to be volume leaders to begin with, but it sets the tone for the entire lineup. I think the Germans realize this.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 AM.