Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

2019 Toyota Supra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 08:56 AM
  #436  
Kense's Avatar
Kense
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 794
Likes: 3
From: CA
Default

Looks like a large Miata
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 09:05 AM
  #437  
plex's Avatar
plex
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 76
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by Kense
Looks like a large Miata
With Toyota bench marking Cayman for this car the size isn't surprising I wish it was bigger.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 09:28 AM
  #438  
BippuLexus's Avatar
BippuLexus
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 11
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
A major engine upgrade is no where on par with cosmetic changes. M2 was only out for 3 model years before getting a complete engine upgrade. Why didnt they just put M3/4 engine in the first place? Its also a middle finger to M3/4 owners.
Its the same logic though. Its only in your opinion that a major engine upgrade is no the same as cosmetic changes. What I was talking about wasn't even just cosmetic changes - it was new tech and features as well.

You have understand car changes happen every year, two years or three. There's no controlling it. If you are that worried about engine changes, buy a new car every year - because that's just how the business is.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 09:31 AM
  #439  
jadu's Avatar
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 90
From: CALI
Default

i love it! i would have liked it to be much bigger as well.
Originally Posted by Kense
Looks like a large Miata

so much truth to this. i can hear the word on the streets and memes now much like how the FRS and BRZ is the new 240.

nice hardtop s2k/miata.
nice nissan 3X0Z!
what year 3X0Z is that?
what model year is that miata/s2k/3X0Z?
what kind of hardtop you got on that miata/s2k/3X0Z?
what kind of exhaust you got on that miata/s2k/3X0Z?
what body kit you got on that miata/s2k/3X0Z?
what engine you swap in that miata/s2k/3X0Z?

just sayin

LOL
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 10:36 AM
  #440  
IS350jet's Avatar
IS350jet
Pole Position
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 1
From: Coral Springs, Fl
Default

Embarrassing. It's a BMW Z4 for Pet's sake. It appears very little of Toyotas' work actually went into the car. So much for a legend.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 10:36 AM
  #441  
UDel's Avatar
UDel
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,269
Likes: 296
From: ------
Default

Originally Posted by Kense
Looks like a large Miata
That is exactly what I thought. It is just too small, should have been longer.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 10:38 AM
  #442  
UDel's Avatar
UDel
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,269
Likes: 296
From: ------
Default

Originally Posted by plex
With Toyota bench marking Cayman for this car the size isn't surprising I wish it was bigger.
That's the problem, should have been benchmarked against a 911 or 928 type Porsche like the last Supra.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 10:48 AM
  #443  
plex's Avatar
plex
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 76
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by IS350jet
Embarrassing. It's a BMW Z4 for Pet's sake. It appears very little of Toyotas' work actually went into the car. So much for a legend.
Toyota supposedly had a hand in the tuning etc on the Supra....not sure what they did exactly until they officially release something we won't truly know.

Originally Posted by UDel
That's the problem, should have been benchmarked against a 911 or 928 type Porsche like the last Supra.
100% agree those would have been better benchmarks a smaller sportier lighter LC chassis would have worked with the 3.5 V6TT from the LS500 but who knows why Toyota went the route they did.

Hopefully Monday's reveal will have a lot of info.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 12:02 PM
  #444  
situman's Avatar
situman
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 296
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by plex
100% agree those would have been better benchmarks a smaller sportier lighter LC chassis would have worked with the 3.5 V6TT from the LS500 but who knows why Toyota went the route they did.
.
This has been the new trend with Toyota sports cars lately. Share development costs with other manufacturers (Subie and BMW) or use old parts (5L V8, RCF, GSF)
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 12:55 PM
  #445  
Fizzboy7's Avatar
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,994
Likes: 248
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
Looks like an updated GT86 rather than a Supra.
At $60k plus - good luck.

The short wheelbase really hurts the look of this car.
My thoughts exactly. It has more of a fancy compact car look, whereas the last Supras were full-bodied gran tourers. This is not an upgrade.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 05:10 PM
  #446  
pizzafan's Avatar
pizzafan
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 2
From: NJ
Default

Lexus already has two grand tourers -- rc-f, lc500.
They are not selling well. There's no point making a 3rd.

It's a good thing that this supra is not the same. Lexus could use a sports car to compete with the 718 & 911
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 05:41 PM
  #447  
MattyG's Avatar
MattyG
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 4
From: RightHere
Default

The MKV will never be good enough for MKIV owners and enthusiasts. Toyota already did the research on this and knows all of these things. So why try and fill that niche market? The MKIV is legendary and deserves every bit of the praise that it gets. So many good things on that car that were innovative. This is not that car and wouldn't be good enough anyway.

This is a car aimed at a much different generation of buyers. I agree with pizzafan. You already have two GT cars in the Toyota stable right now and they don't do well. So what sense does it make to create yet another large two door?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 06:28 PM
  #448  
ragingf80's Avatar
ragingf80
Pole Position
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 358
Likes: 11
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
A major engine upgrade is no where on par with cosmetic changes. M2 was only out for 3 model years before getting a complete engine upgrade. Why didnt they just put M3/4 engine in the first place? Its also a middle finger to M3/4 owners.
The engine in the M2 is a detuned version of the M3/4 engine. Since the M2 and M3/4 are almost the same weight, the M2 does not step on the M3/4's toes.

Originally Posted by MattyG
The MKV will never be good enough for MKIV owners and enthusiasts. Toyota already did the research on this and knows all of these things. So why try and fill that niche market? The MKIV is legendary and deserves every bit of the praise that it gets. So many good things on that car that were innovative. This is not that car and wouldn't be good enough anyway.

This is a car aimed at a much different generation of buyers. I agree with pizzafan. You already have two GT cars in the Toyota stable right now and they don't do well. So what sense does it make to create yet another large two door?
Agreed. A modern Supra is a hard sell in this market. The market for larger GTs is crowded and Toyota would have had a difficult time putting a dent in it because there are so many good cars out there making insane power that still handle well!
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2019 | 10:02 PM
  #449  
Fizzboy7's Avatar
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,994
Likes: 248
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by MattyG
The MKV will never be good enough for MKIV owners and enthusiasts. Toyota already did the research on this and knows all of these things. So why try and fill that niche market? The MKIV is legendary and deserves every bit of the praise that it gets. So many good things on that car that were innovative. This is not that car and wouldn't be good enough anyway.

This is a car aimed at a much different generation of buyers. I agree with pizzafan. You already have two GT cars in the Toyota stable right now and they don't do well. So what sense does it make to create yet another large two door?
This is all true. GT's are a hard sell these days. Therefore, what Toyota is doing with the Supra makes sense. But calling it a Supra does not. Maybe Celica would have been better for this type of vehicle. What I am seeing here does not do the Supra name justice. It's a new approach that should have a different name.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2019 | 09:00 AM
  #450  
Benoit's Avatar
Benoit
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 605
Likes: 42
From: Switzerland
Default

I just was stroked by something...

Even if the Supra isn't the FT-1...
Wouldn't it be impossible to go from this :




To Thiis :



?????
I mean... the bases sure look similar. Couldn't a bodykit fix this ?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:13 AM.