2017 Lincoln Continental
You probably have without knowing it. Visually, from the front 2/3 of the vehicle, except for the door handles, though the Continental is little longer and wider than the MKZ, the two are almost identical.
Continental:

MKZ:
Continental:

MKZ:
Last edited by mmarshall; Feb 3, 2017 at 04:32 PM.
I have not seen a new Continental yet, either, but then, I now have a much shorter commute to-and-from work without having to drive on the highway.
While waiting for at the airport for a limo last week, I noticed quite a few ES Hybrid and Cadillac XTS livery vehicles but no Lincolns.
While waiting for at the airport for a limo last week, I noticed quite a few ES Hybrid and Cadillac XTS livery vehicles but no Lincolns.
Originally Posted by Sulu
I have not seen a new Continental yet, either, but then, I now have a much shorter commute to-and-from work without having to drive on the highway.
While waiting for at the airport for a limo last week, I noticed quite a few ES Hybrid and Cadillac XTS livery vehicles but no Lincolns.
While waiting for at the airport for a limo last week, I noticed quite a few ES Hybrid and Cadillac XTS livery vehicles but no Lincolns.
I saw a bunch of these in NYC now, as limo fleets are using them.
From the rear it looks great, even rear quarter view is nice.
But then the side is completely ruined by the FWD proportions and the hood is just so short.
Looks very weird and unappealing.
CT6 and G89/G90 look much better.
From the rear it looks great, even rear quarter view is nice.
But then the side is completely ruined by the FWD proportions and the hood is just so short.
Looks very weird and unappealing.
CT6 and G89/G90 look much better.
So you are saying that the Continental's proportions are wrong, without the traditional sedan proportions? Even Volvo knows that luxury cars need that classic long hood, long dash-to-front-wheel ratio look, so they designed their FWD S90 to look more like a RWD sedan rather than a transverse-engined FWD car.
Originally Posted by Sulu
I have not seen a new Continental yet, either,
I don't quite see why Lincoln gave the MKZ and Continental virtually identical front end and styling forward of the C-Pillars. But, then again, Buick did the same thing with all three of its last-genenation American-market sedans.
I have seen at least five Contis now on the road. It's a total breath of fresh air compared the German cars and the poor looking front ends of the Lexus models such as the ES, GS or LS. Long term, the Conti is going match up well with the next gen ES. FWD vs FWD. We sat in the car a few weeks ago, it's a fantastic interior with great materials and for the first time, the PRNDL buttons actually work. Too bad the dealer experience was poor as we're never once approached by anyone for the 30 minutes we were in the Ford/Lincoln delear. Compared to Lexus or BMW or MB, they are world's better.
As for the livery vehicles, I see a ton of Lexus ES airport taxis all the time. MKS taxis are everywhere. I highly doubt we are going to see any Contis but you never know.
As for the livery vehicles, I see a ton of Lexus ES airport taxis all the time. MKS taxis are everywhere. I highly doubt we are going to see any Contis but you never know.
I thought I saw one the other day, could've swore it was a continental until is passed by and I could see from the side profile, door handle design and rear end, that it was the Lincoln "Ford Fusion" equivelant that has been out for years, can't remember the name but definitely not a Continental.
So why is the front end of the Continental IDENTICAL to that cheap Fusion-based Lincoln? I do not understand it. It's 100% exact.
So why is the front end of the Continental IDENTICAL to that cheap Fusion-based Lincoln? I do not understand it. It's 100% exact.
Okay seeing MM's post above of the 2 cars, there are some minor differences in the fronts, but holy crap, that is WAY too similar. Someone at Lincoln thought it was smart to make the flagship front end look just like the midsize car? Running out of ideas? Maybe time for a new design team? That is pathetic.
I thought I saw one the other day, could've swore it was a continental until is passed by and I could see from the side profile, door handle design and rear end, that it was the Lincoln "Ford Fusion" equivelant that has been out for years, can't remember the name but definitely not a Continental.
So why is the front end of the Continental IDENTICAL to that cheap Fusion-based Lincoln? I do not understand it. It's 100% exact.
So why is the front end of the Continental IDENTICAL to that cheap Fusion-based Lincoln? I do not understand it. It's 100% exact.
Okay seeing MM's post above of the 2 cars, there are some minor differences in the fronts, but holy crap, that is WAY too similar. Someone at Lincoln thought it was smart to make the flagship front end look just like the midsize car? Running out of ideas? Maybe time for a new design team? That is pathetic.
Originally Posted by mmarshall
I don't quite see why Lincoln gave the MKZ and Continental virtually identical front end and styling forward of the C-Pillars.
Last edited by mmarshall; Feb 4, 2017 at 04:46 PM.
Pathetic in the sense that they could not design a unique face for their flagship sedan and basically copy pasted the face of the cheap model onto it, changed the angle of the bumper side openings and put different internals into the headlights. Otherwise it's identical.
Pathetic in the sense that they could not design a unique face for their flagship sedan and basically copy pasted the face of the cheap model onto it, changed the angle of the bumper side openings and put different internals into the headlights. Otherwise it's identical.
Steve













