Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

2016 Chevrolet Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 11:39 AM
  #106  
I8ABMR's Avatar
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 22,608
Likes: 105
From: Waiting for next track day
Default

did they finally get rid of that lame dash?? The exterior looks amazing. I love this thing.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 08:06 PM
  #107  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,472
Likes: 3,828
Default

yes, completely overhauled, modernized, better materials, very high tech.

Reply
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 08:17 PM
  #108  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,472
Likes: 3,828
Default

gauge cluster is 'traditional' (still boxy and ugly) or they have an optional all LCD panel which is very cool...

Reply
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 08:22 PM
  #109  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,472
Likes: 3,828
Default

supports both android auto and apple carplay systems too.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 08:28 PM
  #110  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,223
Likes: 221
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
gauge cluster is 'traditional' (still boxy and ugly) or they have an optional all LCD panel which is very cool...
Not quite as traditional, though, as the last panel...which harkened back to the 1960s versions by having the secondary gauges in a row down under the dash, forward of the shift-lever, where you had to take your eyes way off the road to scan them. This way, on the new 2016, they are right up there in view with the two big primary gauges.

I don't know if I like the idea, though, of those two huge circular-vents on the console blowing out ice-cold air on your pinkies when you are trying to shift LOL.

(some of GM's A/C systems, like those of Toyota/Lexus, when cranked up, could frostbite an Eskimo)

Last edited by mmarshall; Nov 26, 2015 at 08:34 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2015 | 12:55 AM
  #111  
cino's Avatar
cino
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
yes, completely overhauled, modernized, better materials, very high tech.

Outward visibility is still horrible.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2015 | 08:25 AM
  #112  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,472
Likes: 3,828
Default

Originally Posted by cino
Outward visibility is still horrible.
is a lexus rc that much better?

Reply
Old Nov 27, 2015 | 04:44 PM
  #113  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,474
Likes: 320
From: California
Default



This is a previous Z/28 interior but just to give an idea of the upgrades. Such a night and day difference. Way to go Bowtie
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2015 | 04:53 PM
  #114  
mjeds's Avatar
mjeds
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 192
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by cino
Outward visibility is still horrible.
Originally Posted by bitkahuna
is a lexus rc that much better?



coming from a 2012 Camaro to an RCF


yes the RC has much better rear visibility.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2015 | 07:16 PM
  #115  
G8rGirl's Avatar
G8rGirl
Driver
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by mjeds
coming from a 2012 Camaro to an RCF


yes the RC has much better rear visibility.
Do you like the RCF better than the Camaro? Which would you pick between the 2016 Camaro SS and the RC 350? Power vs. luxury?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2015 | 09:40 AM
  #116  
mjeds's Avatar
mjeds
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 192
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by G8rGirl
Do you like the RCF better than the Camaro? Which would you pick between the 2016 Camaro SS and the RC 350? Power vs. luxury?

I've been a GM guy my whole life, 9 GM models since I started driving in 1986. 3 of them Camaros, 1 Trans Am, several trucks, and an Impala SS and a Cadillac DTS. I also had a Chrysler 300c SRT8 and 2 Mustangs in there a 1971 Mach I and a 1993 GT Convertible.


The RC-F is my first ever import.


now with that being said. Unless GM does some major shifting in quality and customer service I will never buy another GM product.


my last 3 GM vehicle were plagued with issues. The last solid GM product I bought was a 2000 Silverado Z71, had that truck for 8 years 240,000 miles and it never saw the dealer for any warranty work, or any major work period, I sold that truck to a neighbor in 2006 and he had added another 100,000K to it with only an alternator and water pump replacement.


my 2003 Caddy, a mess of issues
my 2002 Impala SS, 4 water pump failures
my 2010 Avalanche serious electronic issues that would cause the truck to randomly shut down at highway speeds, dealer couldn't reproduce because a key cycle cleared the error codes.


my 2012 Camaro, major issues vehicle ended up being a lemon law buy back which is what paid for the Lexus.


I was looking to replace the Camaro with a Corvette, however based on the history I have experienced with GM since 2003 I decided to do some research on the Corvette first.. While a fantastic vehicle, GM has experienced approx. 7% of the C7 Corvettes having catastrophic motor failures. 7% may not seem like a lot, but total sales for the Corvette C7 have been ~37,000 and 7% is ~2600 vehicles where within the first 2,000 miles the motors had to be completely replaced due to a broken valve spring dropping a valve.


This does not ring quality to me in a $70,000 vehicle.


coupled with the pure "***** on the customer" attitude of the GM dealer franchises (or American dealers in general because I saw the same behaviors at Chrysler and Ford), personally I am done with American cars.


The RC-F is not really comparable to a Corvette in overall performance, but I will never track the car so it really doesn't matter to me, my personal preference is a 400+ hp V8 car with some specific amenities and the RC-F fit that bill.




Which is better the RC over the Camaro?


IMO the Lexus will win out hands done for quality and customer service. I've seen the 2016 Camaro up close, and while GM had stepped up their level of materials I have lost faith in their ability to build quality vehicles and their ability to support them. My Lexus is leaps and bounds better in materials and quality, though the ergonomics are a little iffy, I personally prefer tactile controls that I can change without taking my eyes off the road, the Camaro was better in this sense, the Lexus requires too much distraction to adjust HVAC or Radio IMO.


They have reduced and restricted their overall warranty coverage dropping it from 5/100 for powertrain to 5/60, they have eliminated their free 2 year maintenance programs. To me this screams lack of faith in their vehicles.




GM will win out if raw power is your desire, but be prepared to spend a good part of your ownership time in a rental while your Camaro is at the dealer.


My Camaro had a total of 7 months in dealer hands during 3 years of ownership.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2015 | 11:15 AM
  #117  
G8rGirl's Avatar
G8rGirl
Driver
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by mjeds
I've been a GM guy my whole life, 9 GM models since I started driving in 1986. 3 of them Camaros, 1 Trans Am, several trucks, and an Impala SS and a Cadillac DTS. I also had a Chrysler 300c SRT8 and 2 Mustangs in there a 1971 Mach I and a 1993 GT Convertible.


The RC-F is my first ever import.


now with that being said. Unless GM does some major shifting in quality and customer service I will never buy another GM product.


my last 3 GM vehicle were plagued with issues. The last solid GM product I bought was a 2000 Silverado Z71, had that truck for 8 years 240,000 miles and it never saw the dealer for any warranty work, or any major work period, I sold that truck to a neighbor in 2006 and he had added another 100,000K to it with only an alternator and water pump replacement.


my 2003 Caddy, a mess of issues
my 2002 Impala SS, 4 water pump failures
my 2010 Avalanche serious electronic issues that would cause the truck to randomly shut down at highway speeds, dealer couldn't reproduce because a key cycle cleared the error codes.


my 2012 Camaro, major issues vehicle ended up being a lemon law buy back which is what paid for the Lexus.


I was looking to replace the Camaro with a Corvette, however based on the history I have experienced with GM since 2003 I decided to do some research on the Corvette first.. While a fantastic vehicle, GM has experienced approx. 7% of the C7 Corvettes having catastrophic motor failures. 7% may not seem like a lot, but total sales for the Corvette C7 have been ~37,000 and 7% is ~2600 vehicles where within the first 2,000 miles the motors had to be completely replaced due to a broken valve spring dropping a valve.


This does not ring quality to me in a $70,000 vehicle.


coupled with the pure "***** on the customer" attitude of the GM dealer franchises (or American dealers in general because I saw the same behaviors at Chrysler and Ford), personally I am done with American cars.


The RC-F is not really comparable to a Corvette in overall performance, but I will never track the car so it really doesn't matter to me, my personal preference is a 400+ hp V8 car with some specific amenities and the RC-F fit that bill.




Which is better the RC over the Camaro?


IMO the Lexus will win out hands done for quality and customer service. I've seen the 2016 Camaro up close, and while GM had stepped up their level of materials I have lost faith in their ability to build quality vehicles and their ability to support them. My Lexus is leaps and bounds better in materials and quality, though the ergonomics are a little iffy, I personally prefer tactile controls that I can change without taking my eyes off the road, the Camaro was better in this sense, the Lexus requires too much distraction to adjust HVAC or Radio IMO.


They have reduced and restricted their overall warranty coverage dropping it from 5/100 for powertrain to 5/60, they have eliminated their free 2 year maintenance programs. To me this screams lack of faith in their vehicles.




GM will win out if raw power is your desire, but be prepared to spend a good part of your ownership time in a rental while your Camaro is at the dealer.


My Camaro had a total of 7 months in dealer hands during 3 years of ownership.
WOW...thank you for the detailed response. The Camaro is not as tempting considering these reliability issues. Lexus is definitely peace of mind in addition to luxury.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2015 | 12:01 PM
  #118  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,223
Likes: 221
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by mjeds

They have reduced and restricted their overall warranty coverage dropping it from 5/100 for powertrain to 5/60, they have eliminated their free 2 year maintenance programs. To me this screams lack of faith in their vehicles.
Chevy's warranty is the same now as on most mainstream Japanese brands (5/60 drivetrain and 3/36 bumper-to-bumper)....Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Mazda, and Subaru. And Chevy has kept the 5/100 drivetrain warranty for truck diesels. Buick and Cadillac both have the same warranties as Lexus, Infiniti, and Acura......6/70 drivetrain and 4/50 bumper-to-bumper. IMO, that's not skimpy warranty coverage.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 12:30 PM
  #119  
I8ABMR's Avatar
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 22,608
Likes: 105
From: Waiting for next track day
Default

The interior is SOOOOO much nicer than the last gen. Like worlds away. In fact its more improved than even the Vette's
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 02:15 PM
  #120  
mjeds's Avatar
mjeds
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 192
From: CA
Default

saw it at the L.A. Auto Show this past weekend.


the interior and exterior styling is nice, but the interior materials still look and feel cheap when compared to other vehicles.


the dash while looking leatherish; felt rubbery however I have the same thing to say about the Mustang and the Challenger.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 AM.