shopping for a small SUV advice needed.
We are looking at a Small SUV needs AWD and navigation under $30K.
I am leaning towards the Honda CRV. Wanted any advice, were also going to look at the Santa Fe Sport which is a tad larger.
We had looked at the Forrester before but were not impressed didn't care for the CVT. We had not looked at the CX-5 Mazda but when testing the Mazda 6 we were not impressed with the TomTom nav system and the Forrester also seems to be lacking in the nav department as it seems like a generation behind the Honda.
I am leaning towards the Honda CRV. Wanted any advice, were also going to look at the Santa Fe Sport which is a tad larger.
We had looked at the Forrester before but were not impressed didn't care for the CVT. We had not looked at the CX-5 Mazda but when testing the Mazda 6 we were not impressed with the TomTom nav system and the Forrester also seems to be lacking in the nav department as it seems like a generation behind the Honda.
Last edited by rai; Jun 1, 2014 at 11:31 AM.
I don't endorse Ford, but there's the Escape. There's the Tucson too. However, if you will keep it 7+ years, pick between the CRV or RAV4 without a doubt as they are the most reliable.
EDIT: Did you see the Subaru Crosstek XV? Basically an Impreza hatchback on stilts but also has the CVT. However, it does have a manual mode, paddle shifters, and " 6 gears" for a more engaging drive whereas the Forester has this only in select models.
EDIT: Did you see the Subaru Crosstek XV? Basically an Impreza hatchback on stilts but also has the CVT. However, it does have a manual mode, paddle shifters, and " 6 gears" for a more engaging drive whereas the Forester has this only in select models.
Last edited by corradoMR2; Jun 1, 2014 at 11:56 AM.
I assume you are talking brand-new rather than used.
That said, it's hard to go wrong with the CR-V. It's Swiss-Watch assembly-quality is legend, it has a stellar reliability record, a ride that is smoother than most of its rivals, good space efficiency inside for its exterior size, a fairly nice color choice, FWD models if traction is not an issue, decent outward visibility except for the large D-pillars, and generally easy-to-use controls. Negatives include a less-flexible 5-speed automatic where some rivals use a 6-speed, the lack of a V6 for added power, and an ingrained culture at a lot Honda dealerships that sometimes make them difficult to deal on.
Also take a good look at the Subaru Outback and Forester, both of which have good histories. The Outback, being a raised Legacy wagon, is probably the most car-like of all SUVs in its driving experience. The Forester's outward visibility and interior space efficiency are virtually unmatched. The Subaru Symmetrical AWD systems are considered by many in the industry to be the best-designed AWD systems of them all. Negatives include a boxer-four or six engine that, while generally reliable, will probably not last as long as the Honda's 4, CVT transmissions on the 4-cylinders (if you don't get a manual) that take some getting used to, and a somewhat more sparse dealership-network than Honda.
That said, it's hard to go wrong with the CR-V. It's Swiss-Watch assembly-quality is legend, it has a stellar reliability record, a ride that is smoother than most of its rivals, good space efficiency inside for its exterior size, a fairly nice color choice, FWD models if traction is not an issue, decent outward visibility except for the large D-pillars, and generally easy-to-use controls. Negatives include a less-flexible 5-speed automatic where some rivals use a 6-speed, the lack of a V6 for added power, and an ingrained culture at a lot Honda dealerships that sometimes make them difficult to deal on.
Also take a good look at the Subaru Outback and Forester, both of which have good histories. The Outback, being a raised Legacy wagon, is probably the most car-like of all SUVs in its driving experience. The Forester's outward visibility and interior space efficiency are virtually unmatched. The Subaru Symmetrical AWD systems are considered by many in the industry to be the best-designed AWD systems of them all. Negatives include a boxer-four or six engine that, while generally reliable, will probably not last as long as the Honda's 4, CVT transmissions on the 4-cylinders (if you don't get a manual) that take some getting used to, and a somewhat more sparse dealership-network than Honda.
Last edited by mmarshall; Jun 1, 2014 at 06:43 PM.
We are looking at a Small SUV needs AWD and navigation under $30K.
I am leaning towards the Honda CRV. Wanted any advice, were also going to look at the Santa Fe Sport which is a tad larger.
We had looked at the Forrester before but were not impressed didn't care for the CVT. We had not looked at the CX-5 Mazda but when testing the Mazda 6 we were not impressed with the TomTom nav system and the Forrester also seems to be lacking in the nav department as it seems like a generation behind the Honda.
I am leaning towards the Honda CRV. Wanted any advice, were also going to look at the Santa Fe Sport which is a tad larger.
We had looked at the Forrester before but were not impressed didn't care for the CVT. We had not looked at the CX-5 Mazda but when testing the Mazda 6 we were not impressed with the TomTom nav system and the Forrester also seems to be lacking in the nav department as it seems like a generation behind the Honda.
I never really dug the Forrester. If I was in the market for one of these vehicles, I'd look seriously at the CRV, CX-5 and Rogue.
Given that you have 2 Honda products in your signature, it would certainly be a safe and familiar choice.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by corradoMR2
EDIT: Did you see the Subaru Crosstek XV? Basically an Impreza hatchback on stilts but also has the CVT. However, it does have a manual mode, paddle shifters, and " 6 gears" for a more engaging drive whereas the Forester has this only in select models.
The XV Crosstrek is a nice small raised-suspension hatchback AWD (with some funky paint-colors), but it doesn't have the room inside or good outward visibility of the larger, more squared-off Forester. That's why I didn't mention it in my last post.
Unless Nav systems improve dramatically in the next few years, I think our RX will be the last car we ever buy with one. It's been literally years since we used it for directions.
I went through this process myself last year and narrowed it down to the CX-5 and Rav4. In the end, Rav4 was a little larger and more comfortable for me, which ultimately made it the winner.
No bad choices in this class, which is great!
No bad choices in this class, which is great!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
petergerst
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
5
Dec 19, 2006 11:17 AM











