Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Test drove the Chevy SS today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2014 | 04:01 PM
  #31  
yowps3's Avatar
yowps3
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
From: NSW
Default

Originally Posted by Joeb427
H,$47K is affordable?
Add in it's an ugly high performance Malibu.
Yes it's good value for money actually. How much does the equivalent C63 AMG or M5 cost?
Reply
Old May 10, 2014 | 04:56 PM
  #32  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,218
Likes: 220
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
That's not true at all. My CT was borderline crap, but I tone it down as this is a Lexus forum.
The CT I reviewed had decent interior materials (especially the nice NuLuxe upholstery, which I was impressed with), and, overall, was well-assembled with good fit/finish. But I agree that its firm noisy ride and overall lack of refinement was more worthy of a Toyota badge than a Lexus.

GM on the other hand should focus on reliability, affordability, and interior materials.
GM does interiors (and materials) that, IMO, run the whole gamut from superb to just plain junk. One of the reasons (among many) that I bought a Verano was that I was impressed with its Opel-Astra-derived solid interior materials, strong solid construction, Germanc ride/handling balance, and lots of Buick-added sound-insulation for a quiet ride. But, even in the Buick showroom (I may own a Verano, but I'm not necessarily a Buick-fanboy) there are some models that I am clearly not impressed with. And the Cadillac XTS, IMO, though with a nice interior and an AWD option, is otherwise a joke and not worthy of a flagship-designation.

Making a $47k Chevy SS is just stupid.
Is it dumb, then, for Chrysler to make SRT Chargers and 300s that sell the same general price range......or more? A few years ago, I did a special end-of-year review of a Chrysler SRT 300 that listed above 60K.
Reply
Old May 10, 2014 | 06:39 PM
  #33  
bagwell's Avatar
bagwell
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 11
From: The Woodlands, TX
Default

I don't think anyone would actually pay $46K for one.....see link ----

$7000 off MSRP before haggle!
Reply
Old May 10, 2014 | 06:48 PM
  #34  
Joeb427's Avatar
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11,670
Likes: 20
From: SC
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
I don't think anyone would actually pay $46K for one.....see link ----

$7000 off MSRP before haggle!

There might be one or two nuts out there.
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 08:26 AM
  #35  
BoDarville's Avatar
BoDarville
Intermediate
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 334
Likes: 2
From: ga
Default

see you at the gas pump! make sure you get a CC with high % rewards for gas station purchases
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 09:43 AM
  #36  
LH1's Avatar
LH1
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 505
From: PA
Default

Yeah, I saw the place in Miami that's selling them for $7k off MSRP. Pretty crazy. These cars didn't come out that long ago.

They're somewhat appealing to me but they really do look like a slightly bigger Malibu. I think the G8 looked much better.
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 09:46 AM
  #37  
Joeb427's Avatar
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11,670
Likes: 20
From: SC
Default

Originally Posted by LH1
Yeah, I saw the place in Miami that's selling them for $7k off MSRP. Pretty crazy. These cars didn't come out that long ago.

They're somewhat appealing to me but they really do look like a slightly bigger Malibu. I think the G8 looked much better.

I think GM made a mistake with the Malibu look.
Yes,the G8 did look so much better.
Another GM stupid thing was coming out with the new GTO they though would sell because of the name.
How'd that make out?
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 09:54 AM
  #38  
LH1's Avatar
LH1
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 505
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by Joeb427
I think GM made a mistake with the Malibu look.
Yes,the G8 did look so much better.
Another GM stupid thing was coming out with the new GTO they though would sell because of the name.
How'd that make out?
GM has teased me too many times. I was intrigued by the GTO when they first announced it and then I saw it. It's the same thing with this SS [which is horribly overpriced] and the ATS. I really want to try to like GM stuff but...
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 10:59 AM
  #39  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 81
From: CA
Default

The price is approaching the Dodge Charger/Chrysler 300 SRT8. I think I would splurge the extra bucks for more power and better mpg. Not that I would care about mpg if I were to buy these cars..
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 11:05 AM
  #40  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
How many useless GM products have we seen like this in the past. Total waste IMO
Just wow

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
That's not true at all. My CT was borderline crap, but I tone it down as this is a Lexus forum.

GM on the other hand should focus on reliability, affordability, and interior materials. Making a $47k Chevy SS is just stupid. The Corvette is fine but this is just dumb.
No one believes you. You need more people.
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 11:10 AM
  #41  
Blackraven's Avatar
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 1
From: Makati, Philippines
Default

Originally Posted by LexFather
Just wow



No one believes you. You need more people.
Haha nice one Mike.

With that said, I think this vehicle is great and it's a great addition to the segment............which is needed now that Chrysler has announced that the 300C SRT will be discontinued
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 04:38 PM
  #42  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,218
Likes: 220
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
I don't think anyone would actually pay $46K for one.....see link ----
Originally Posted by JOEB427

There might be one or two nuts out there.
Well, guys, there seem to be a fair number of so-called "nuts" out there buying Chargers and 300s in the same general price range.

You also have to look at who these cars are generally aimed at...primarily people of my generation, who still fondly remember the big-engined American sedans and coupes from the 1960s. Those people were (and, to an extent, still are) quite strong in their brand-loyalties. If someone liked the Impala SS in the early/mid 60s (along with the Mustang, arguably that decade's most popular car), he or she is likely to still be somewhat pro-GM today..... especially after the recent return to some decent quality after a lot of the junk of the last 40 years. These are the people that (May?) have just been waiting for a new SS, and previously passed on the Charger and 300.
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 04:03 AM
  #43  
UGKkllr's Avatar
UGKkllr
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: FLORIDA
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
I don't think anyone would actually pay $46K for one.....see link ----

$7000 off MSRP before haggle!
39 grand seems like a heck of a value imo

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
GM on the other hand should focus on reliability, affordability, and interior materials. Making a $47k Chevy SS is just stupid. The Corvette is fine but this is just dumb.
Having spent close to an hour inside the SS , I can assure you the interior materials are mostly nice. There is some plastic trim that I was not crazy about but overall the interior is very sexy
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 05:36 AM
  #44  
Aron9000's Avatar
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,592
Likes: 31
From: TN
Default

I'd take a Charger SRT-8 over the Chevy SS any day of the week. Main thing is the Charger is something interesting to look at. The Chevy, man it looks dated and horribly bland. It harkens back to the 1990's IMO, where everything had to be rounded, bubbly, there isn't a good crease or sharp edge on that car.

The way the wheel arches intersect with the top of the fenders, it makes the body look too tall, like its some sort of pickup truck with the wheel gap, even though its running an aggressive 19" wheel, the way the body is designed it makes the wheels look tiny IMO.
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 08:53 AM
  #45  
Infra's Avatar
Infra
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 1
From: TX
Default

I just think it's amazing GM can take an interior like this



And turn it into this



The satin trim switched for chrome. The carbon fiber, of which was already minimal, switched out for some bland piano black. The smooth plastic trim switched for some bumpy crap. The smooth leather steering wheel, switched out to a frumpy looking coarse leather. The consistent red lighting theme turn into a red/blue superman abomination.

This car was phenomenal as the HS-V. All GM had to do was put a Chevy badge on it and leave the rest alone.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:44 PM.