Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Next Gen Mazda CX-9 News Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2014 | 10:30 AM
  #1  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,474
Likes: 320
From: California
Default Next Gen Mazda CX-9 News Thread

Mazda CX-9 - Caradvice


The next-generation Mazda CX-9 SUV will lose its V6 petrol engine, likely in favour of a more efficient turbocharged four-cylinder.

Mazda global head of sales and marketing, Masahiro Moro, indicated to CarAdvice at the New York auto show that Mazda is in a transition period away from the Ford-sourced V6 seen in the current CX-9.

“We stopped production of our own V6 in the late 1990s. We have used Ford V6 [up until today, and that engine is still used in the CX-9]. Since then everybody is putting in a downsized turbocharged solution.”

Moro suggested the Japanese brand may follow suit in dropping the six-cylinder in favour of a four-cylinder turbo for the next-generation model, which is expected to be launched by 2016.

“I think that turbocharging technology has improved a lot,” he said of the thirsty 2.3-litre four-cylinder turbo that was used in the now defunct Mazda CX-7.

“But obviously a question is whether we put in two more cylinders or use turbocharge, which is cost-effective and [offers] better performance. That’s always a good question for engineers.

“If I ask Mr Hitomi, our top guy of powertrains at Mazda, he believes the downsizing turbo solution costs more. But real downsizing means six-cylinder to four-cylinder turbo could make sense from a cost point of view. But four-cylinder to four-cylinder doesn’t make sense,” he said of reducing engine capacity and power.

“You can make it bigger displacement with four-cylinder, that is cost-friendly. As long as you can get better fuel economy.”

Obvious alternatives include a conventional turbo diesel drivetrain, as many competitor cars such as the Kia Sorento, Hyundai Santa Fe, Ford Territory and Holden Captiva offer.

But Moro said that due to the fact the CX-9 is most popular in the US and customers there choose petrol almost by default, a diesel CX-9 is unlikely.

“With the CX-9 the main market is the USA. In general, these customers don’t have a strong preference towards diesel engines. So probably the main engine should be a petrol engine in my opinion.”

Moro said a diesel wasn’t ruled out, and indeed it would be more likely than a hybrid powertrain, as competing vehicles like the Nissan Pathfinder hybrid and Toyota Kluger [Highlander] hybrid. Neither of those cars are currently sold in Australia, though the Nissan is expected to arrive this year.

“A fuel-efficient petrol engine or diesel engine [would be preferable] where it’s possible. Hybrid is not really a high priority for us other than in the Japanese market,” he said. “It depends on the driving condition of each market. In Australia and the USA, people drive longer mileage, on the highway for example. I think real-world fuel economy, for example, a diesel engine would be better.”

Despite the axe looming over the current V6 and plenty of alternatives being investigated, Mazda won’t be moving away from six-cylinder engines altogether, according to Moro.

“As Mazda is moving up towards premium territory, at some point in time we will need a six-cylinder,” he said. “It’s too early, we don’t have a car yet. But we are collecting advice as to V6 or straight six.”
http://www.caradvice.com.au/282304/m...esel-expected/
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 10:54 AM
  #2  
doge's Avatar
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

I love the idea of a straight 6 but packing one into a FWD car pose a challenge for engineers and mechanic's. I can only imagine the labor required to change a time belt/chain on a horizontal i6
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 10:55 AM
  #3  
Blackraven's Avatar
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 1
From: Makati, Philippines
Default

I guess that means that Mazda can't renew their agreement with Ford for the use of the CYCLONE V6 ENGINE
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 10:57 AM
  #4  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,474
Likes: 320
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by doge
I love the idea of a straight 6 but packing one into a FWD car pose a challenge for engineers and mechanic's. I can only imagine the labor required to change a time belt/chain on a horizontal i6
even so and as you say, the idea of a straight 6
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 11:03 AM
  #5  
Blackraven's Avatar
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 1
From: Makati, Philippines
Default

Originally Posted by doge
I love the idea of a straight 6 but packing one into a FWD car pose a challenge for engineers and mechanic's. I can only imagine the labor required to change a time belt/chain on a horizontal i6
As to your concern, IMHO, this would depend on whether Mazda will release a FWD version for the next CX-9.

Or they could limit 6 cylinder versions to only the AWD version.

Hence, if you choose FWD, then only a 4 cylinder engine would be available.

Something like that....
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 11:06 AM
  #6  
doge's Avatar
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Blackraven
As to your concern, IMHO, this would depend on whether Mazda will release a FWD version for the next CX-9.

Or they could limit 6 cylinder versions to only the AWD version.

Hence, if you choose FWD, then only a 4 cylinder engine would be available.

Something like that....
I don't think it works that way
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 11:18 AM
  #7  
Blackraven's Avatar
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 1
From: Makati, Philippines
Default

Originally Posted by doge
I don't think it works that way
Hmm.......I guess you're right.

Still:
If you ask my opinion, they could go AWD only (ala Subaru). Sure, the downside is that sales will drop since there's no more lower cost FWD variant.......but from a manufacturer's point-of-view, the advantages are quite good as well.
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 12:05 PM
  #8  
tex2670's Avatar
tex2670
Lexus Champion
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,001
Likes: 85
From: Southeastern PA
Default

I can't think of another SUV in this class (or lux class, with similar size) that uses a turbo-4. I know that there are some sedans out there with turbo-4's getting mid to high 200 range in HP, but it will be interesting to see what happens when such an engine ends up in a larger SUV.
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 12:19 PM
  #9  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,474
Likes: 320
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
I can't think of another SUV in this class (or lux class, with similar size) that uses a turbo-4. I know that there are some sedans out there with turbo-4's getting mid to high 200 range in HP, but it will be interesting to see what happens when such an engine ends up in a larger SUV.
Explorer FWD offers 2.0 EcoBoost.
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 12:20 PM
  #10  
tex2670's Avatar
tex2670
Lexus Champion
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,001
Likes: 85
From: Southeastern PA
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Explorer FWD offers 2.0 EcoBoost.
Ah, true--but not AWD. Mazda is saying no 6 at all, not even for AWD.
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 12:26 PM
  #11  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,474
Likes: 320
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
Ah, true--but not AWD. Mazda is saying no 6 at all, not even for AWD.
correct. Just in size. I want this straight six rumor to be true, nice and smooth
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 05:56 AM
  #12  
Ando's Avatar
Ando
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Jakarta
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
I can't think of another SUV in this class (or lux class, with similar size) that uses a turbo-4. I know that there are some sedans out there with turbo-4's getting mid to high 200 range in HP, but it will be interesting to see what happens when such an engine ends up in a larger SUV.
4 cyl is necessary for global markets because in many countries traffic is bad and roads r narrow. Examples of 4 cyl suvs:
- Hyundai santafe / kia sorento 2.4 liter gasoline and 2.2 liter crd.
- Lexus RX 2.7 liter
- the new Toyota Harrier 2.0 liter
- Toyota fortuner (a little smaller than 4runner) 2.7 liter
- Toyota prado 2.7 liter
- Nissan rogue/xtrail
- Etc.
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 07:14 AM
  #13  
TangoRed's Avatar
TangoRed
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 24
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by Blackraven
I guess that means that Mazda can't renew their agreement with Ford for the use of the CYCLONE V6 ENGINE
I'm sure they could, but they've been actively trying to ween themselves off of Ford support much in the same way JLR has been.

Originally Posted by tex2670
I can't think of another SUV in this class (or lux class, with similar size) that uses a turbo-4. I know that there are some sedans out there with turbo-4's getting mid to high 200 range in HP, but it will be interesting to see what happens when such an engine ends up in a larger SUV.
Volvo has one on the way, although it will be supercharged and turbo'd. I think Mazda is going to end up sticking a V6 of some sort in it personally, but we will see...
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 07:31 AM
  #14  
yowps3's Avatar
yowps3
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
From: NSW
Default

Haha anyone who thinks the RX270 will use less fuel than the RX350 is a fool in the first place..
Reply
Old May 3, 2014 | 07:42 AM
  #15  
Ando's Avatar
Ando
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Jakarta
Default

Originally Posted by yowps3
Haha anyone who thinks the RX270 will use less fuel than the RX350 is a fool in the first place..
For hard acceleration n highway cruising you maybe right.

However, for stop n go traffic it does make a difference. Car buyers outside US and mideast stay away from v6. The sales figure speaks for itself.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:01 AM.