When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The reasoning: Today’s chauffer-driven executive, politician or other high roller finds the cramped rear seats of the Lexus LS, the brand’s flagship, or the Toyota Century, the staid old-school V-12 limousine usually spotted outside four-star restaurants, too confining.
So a stretched LS600H is not good enough for them? Poor guys....that's cruel and unusual punishment. My heart just bleeds for them.
there really isn't any super good looking van out there. The sienna is boring. They can't give away the grand caravan.
the nissan quest would have been stellar if they stuck to the elgrande front end. It's so lame that nissan management decided to make the quest look worse when they already had the perfect van suited for North America. The ElGrande front is so gorgeous.
So a stretched LS600H is not good enough for them? Poor guys....that's cruel and unusual punishment. My heart just bleeds for them.
The biggest difference is the height, a van is twice as tall as a sedan. Next to the Vellfire, even the stretched Maybach 62 look cramped. The LS600hL looks like someone leather wrapped a Camry as a joke compare to those 2.
If I have a chauffer, minivan would be my choice of vehicle
Let's do a photo comparison:
1, Toyota Vellfire Royal Lounge.
2, Maybach 62
3, Lexus LS600hL
I'd rather they make a Sienna Platinum or something super expensive with all the luxury touches. I think that would actually go well with affluent families and even livery service.