Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Should running a red light at an empty intersection be legalized?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:05 AM
  #1  
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
PhilipMSPT
Thread Starter
Cycle Savant
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 21,528
Likes: 9
From: In rehab...
Default Should running a red light at an empty intersection be legalized?

This has been proposed for motorcycles, which due to its size and weight, sometimes cannot trigger traffic light sensors. I've been stuck on my motorcycle at an intersection before for several minutes, and I've run the red after waiting for more than two minutes. Another issue is when needing to turn left with a red left-turn signal, and the opposing traffic signal has run through two cycles.

From the point of view of a motorcyclist or bicyclist (who is likely to experience the same problem), many traffic-activate lights are ineffective and will almost never change for a road user on two wheels. Consider my case of entering a left-turn lane at a controlled intersection, waiting through two light cycles without a change in his or her red arrow. Unless a car happens to pull up behind me, that light is never going to go green.

In these instances, I don't deserve to get a ticket for running the red.


But what about cars?

What should the parameters be?

Should you wait a minute? Two minutes? No other traffic? No pedestrians?

What if there are traffic light sensors; must a car wait then no matter what the time limit?

Does it matter if it's a small town or a big city? Urban areas vs. rural roads?

Should there be a difference between private versus commercial vehicles?



DISCUSS.


Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:11 AM
  #2  
Brian@Vossen's Avatar
Brian@Vossen
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Default

What would help to me is more round abouts and less lights. I know its not feasible at every interesection but it would keep traffic flowing at larger ones.



Maybe we need updated lights and sensors that turn them into 4 way stops (all red) when there isn't traffic.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:13 AM
  #3  
Allen K's Avatar
Allen K
-0----0-
CL Folding 25,000
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,182
Likes: 1,158
From: NJ
Default

That assumes people in the US can figure out how to use roundabouts. There is a large one near my workplace and people when you have 1 person that can't work it and everything comes to a stop. Old Florida people and roundabouts scare me
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:25 AM
  #4  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,223
Likes: 220
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

During times of low-traffic (say, between 10 PM and 5 AM), many intersections, IMO, don't need steady red or green lights.....they could do with simple yellow flashers (or yellow/red flashers), where you slow down or stop, check for side traffic, and if clear, simply go through or turn without having to waste time and gasoline waiting for a green. But many localities refuse to reprogram the lights to do so....why, I have no idea.

Last edited by mmarshall; Jun 5, 2013 at 11:12 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:46 AM
  #5  
bagwell's Avatar
bagwell
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 11
From: The Woodlands, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Allen K
That assumes people in the US can figure out how to use roundabouts. There is a large one near my workplace and people when you have 1 person that can't work it and everything comes to a stop. Old Florida people and roundabouts scare me
LOL!!! my thoughts exactly!!! US drivers are pretty stupid as a whole. Need to have more frequent and stringent driving tests!!!
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:51 AM
  #6  
My0gr81's Avatar
My0gr81
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 2
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by Allen K
That assumes people in the US can figure out how to use roundabouts. There is a large one near my workplace and people when you have 1 person that can't work it and everything comes to a stop. Old Florida people and roundabouts scare me
This. I used to live in a city that had numerous traffic circles and most people didn't know how to use them. Created more backlogged traffic than helped the flow. They eventually, over the course of 15 years, got rid of them and where they couldn't added traffic lights at each entry and exit points. Essentially making what should be a single light intersection to be a 2 lights one.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 09:02 AM
  #7  
TangoRed's Avatar
TangoRed
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 24
From: Washington
Default

I would love this rule to go into effect, but I know for a fact that it would turn every intersection into a free for all where people would pull out in front of others. When the cop would ask would happen, I'm sure said person would say "I didn't see the other car coming-I had been waiting here for 2 minutes and didn't see anyone."
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 09:15 AM
  #8  
GS3Tek's Avatar
GS3Tek
CL Community Team
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,388
Likes: 181
From: so cal
Default

Look forward-look left-look right-look behind you.

No other cars around, no cops, AND no traffic cam..........use your discretion

Besides, how often does this come up?

We don't need politicians, flying in their jet, staying at exp. hotels, wasting more $$$ to propose another bill
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 09:25 AM
  #9  
Allen K's Avatar
Allen K
-0----0-
CL Folding 25,000
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,182
Likes: 1,158
From: NJ
Default

I admit I run the red arrows a lot when it's a road with really good visibility
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 10:20 AM
  #10  
Whitigir's Avatar
Whitigir
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 838
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Allen K
I admit I run the red arrows a lot when it's a road with really good visibility
Calling Officer !!!!!!!!!

Anyways, People have enough Accidents without running a red light.

Imagine the Possibility of Accidents when people do run on a red light, good visibility or not, sometime you mind can deceive you !!
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 11:15 AM
  #11  
Fly4u's Avatar
Fly4u
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Banned
Default

While an extension of good driver judgement to permit valid red-light movement would be refreshing, most rules of the road are biased to the least common denominator - for good reason. The potential mayhem at intersections IMHO mitigates against a relaxation of the rule. I'd rather see development of "smarter" traffic lights and/or a more liberalized off-peak policy of flashing amber or simple mandatory 4-way stop.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 11:42 AM
  #12  
Squirrelz's Avatar
Squirrelz
Pole Position
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default

No, that's a stupid solution to the problem. Fix the red lights, don't legalize running red lights....
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 12:08 PM
  #13  
Coconut's Avatar
Coconut
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 137
From: NO
Default

I understand the frustration on motorcycle riders but legalizing running a red light is NOT the solution. People WILL abuse it and more harm than good will come from it.

The correct course of action would be to update the sensors to account for lighter vehicles (motorcycles).
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 01:09 PM
  #14  
speedflex's Avatar
speedflex
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
From: MO
Default

Originally Posted by Mike@Vossen
What would help to me is more round abouts and less lights. I know its not feasible at every interesection but it would keep traffic flowing at larger ones.



Maybe we need updated lights and sensors that turn them into 4 way stops (all red) when there isn't traffic.
THIS! I love roud-abouts. Efficient and effective ways of managing traffic flow. It would take time and there would be major growing pains for Americans to learn how to use them though. But I don't feel that it should ever be legal to run a red light no matter what because the conditions which signal all clear is left up to individual driver judgement... I don't feel confident in that. Also, too many would simply exploit the rule.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 01:18 PM
  #15  
rominl's Avatar
rominl
exclusive matchup
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 81,772
Likes: 349
From: Lovely OC
Default

Originally Posted by Allen K
That assumes people in the US can figure out how to use roundabouts. There is a large one near my workplace and people when you have 1 person that can't work it and everything comes to a stop. Old Florida people and roundabouts scare me
this... you know where i live. roundabouts are good but people need to know how to use them correctly. otherwise it's a timebomb for accidents, which is proven over and over again...

Originally Posted by Coconut
I understand the frustration on motorcycle riders but legalizing running a red light is NOT the solution. People WILL abuse it and more harm than good will come from it.

The correct course of action would be to update the sensors to account for lighter vehicles (motorcycles).
i agree, i simply don't like the idea of running redlights, even for motorcyclists. it should be all about how sensors can be made better. if cars today can "see" if there are cars at your blind spots, keeping you in the lane, monitoring what's ahead and warn you? these light sensors can be made better
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:41 AM.