When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
well compact gas engines are getting 40. Ford hybrids that are full size and have more hp are "rated" at 47. So in order for people to compromise the power and shape of the prius, it has to get 60
you are talking about fake ratings?
So I guess the question is - will Toyota work the EPA results so they get fake rating too?
I remember when GM advertised their 4 cylinder, FWD Terrain as getting 33 hwy mpg, an obvious lie. They still claim it achieves 32 hwy mpg, still a laughable lie for a 4,000 pound, boxy SUV. It seems certain domestic models are allowed false EPA ratings.
Last edited by Chocolate; Mar 19, 2013 at 07:22 AM.
I remember when GM advertised their 4 cylinder, FWD Terrain as getting 33 hwy mpg, an obvious lie. They still claim it achieves 32 hwy mpg, still a laughable lie for a 4,000 pound, boxy SUV. It seems certain domestic models are allowed false EPA ratings.
yeah, it is interesting... all these Ford hybrids getting 47 MPG combined actually get 36-39 max in real life, slightly less than Toyota Hybrids that should get 40 MPG EPA.
So now Ford is gaining sales, it has better CAFE numbers but some customers are complaining, not enough for now to influence their sales.
In fact, one of the guys that had 2010 Fusion Hybrid and now has 2013, says that his 2010 constantly gets better mpg over the same routes (new one should get 10 MPG better).
so question is - will Toyota have to play the EPA numbers themselves? Otherwise public perception is that they are behind the curve, low technology company.
+1 on the center stack design. That design gives absolutely no benefits to the driver (only allowing the manufacturer a few parts that can be shared between LHD and RHD markets) but is an unbelievably bad idea and serves to block many potential buyers from choosing the car. Mini does the same thing, although adhering to tradition is their reason. I would never buy a car with a center mounted instrument panel.
I have a 2011 Prius and used to think this way. However, I've had no issue with the center-ish placement of the displays. Heck, I already look to the center to see the rearview mirror. A big advantage of the center display is that I can adjust my steering wheel for comfort and not worry about obstructing any displays. The only complaint I have with the Prius display is that Toyota uses a display technology that is mostly blocked by polarized sunglasses. I have a set of non-polarized dark glasses for use in the Prius.
As for the picture, I'd like to see the front. From the spy pics I've seen, the front is supposed to look a lot more athletic.
yeah, it is interesting... all these Ford hybrids getting 47 MPG combined actually get 36-39 max in real life, slightly less than Toyota Hybrids that should get 40 MPG EPA.
So now Ford is gaining sales, it has better CAFE numbers but some customers are complaining, not enough for now to influence their sales.
In fact, one of the guys that had 2010 Fusion Hybrid and now has 2013, says that his 2010 constantly gets better mpg over the same routes (new one should get 10 MPG better).
It's remarkable. The Lincoln MKZ hybrid uses a larger displacement engine and weighs 700 POUNDS more than a Lexus CT, yet it somehow gets 3mpg better. Another EPA lie.