Looking for some advice..
It sounds like you were both at fault though also known as Contributory negligence. If you both were trying to merge and neither seen each other that might be the case.
Goodluck either way.
As mentioned by xsh0tya, it will help your insurance company a whole heck of a lot when they can go into negotiations and show you weren't found guilty in court (regardless of how you got off).
It sounds like you were both at fault though also known as Contributory negligence. If you both were trying to merge and neither seen each other that might be the case.
Goodluck either way.
Last edited by BostonVP; Jun 25, 2011 at 10:26 AM.
As mentioned by xsh0tya, it will help your insurance company a whole heck of a lot when they can go into negotiations and show you weren't found guilty in court (regardless of how you got off).
As mentioned by xsh0tya, it will help your insurance company a whole heck of a lot when they can go into negotiations and show you weren't found guilty in court (regardless of how you got off).
Trending Topics
The problem with the accident ones is if the other party involved shows up (that's why it's good to have an attorney to try to knock the citation out early on technicalities), but you'd be surprised how often they won't show up either and the case gets tossed. Usually the times the other party will show up is if the party got hurt (not just the car).
However note, even if you get the infraction tossed...the insurance company will still ding you (less so than if you were found guilty).
The judges I have seen the few times I've gone there with friends and one time with a family member didn't ask much of the lawyers or those that defended themselves. Either they bought you're argument or they didn't.
I think probably the biggest issues that is talked about in these courtrooms is officers writing driver was reckless or careless and the judge telling them they didn't get it right in citing that person's behavior as either one of those.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
The problem with the accident ones is if the other party involved shows up (that's why it's good to have an attorney to try to knock the citation out early on technicalities), but you'd be surprised how often they won't show up either and the case gets tossed. Usually the times the other party will show up is if the party got hurt (not just the car).
However note, even if you get the infraction tossed...the insurance company will still ding you (less so than if you were found guilty).
The judges I have seen the few times I've gone there with friends and one time with a family member didn't ask much of the lawyers or those that defended themselves. Either they bought you're argument or they didn't.
I think probably the biggest issues that is talked about in these courtrooms is officers writing driver was reckless or careless and the judge telling them they didn't get it right in citing that person's behavior as either one of those.
Last edited by BostonVP; Jun 28, 2011 at 10:35 AM.
In your case, you will most likely get pays only if you file a small cliam against the other owner/driver's, not the insurance compnay (the owner/driver will forward the court summon to their insurance company and that when they decide to pay you or not. They will something when they think it snot worth to go to the court.
I have full coverage so I get to yell at my insurance agents when ****s happen!!
Last edited by grabber2; Jun 28, 2011 at 10:58 AM.
In your case, you will most likely get pays only if you file a small cliam against the other owner/driver's, not the insurance compnay (the owner/driver will forward the court summon to their insurance company and that when they decide to pay you or not. They will something when they think it snot worth to go to the court.
I have full coverage so I get to yell at my insurance agents when ****s happen!!






