Formula One change in 2013
. Can't say they will be thrilled in the land where "bigger is better". Gengar hit it on the head, it isn't a "green" sport but rather an elitist "Green with money" sport so why pretend?
And yes, designing another engine from the ground up is going to be very, very costly. The FIA seems dead set on Killing F1
This.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
i suppose any method of making additional power without an increase in fuel consumption can be considered "green" (in the most liberal sense, mind you).
but that's just me.
-Remuneration for test or race drivers, including any young driver programmes;
-Fines or penalties imposed by the FIA;
-Engine costs (for 2010 only);
-Any expenditure which the team can demonstrate has no influence on its performance in the Championship;
-Dividends (including any tax thereon) paid from profits relating to participation in the Championship.
however, any move to help cap team spending and the cost of entry is a sign that formula one wants to try to lower the main barrier of entry: cost.
(actually, that's the second barrier of entry; bernie ecclestone is the first one.
)
Be it so or not, Ferrari, McLaren, Honda and Toyota would have had operating budgets at about $400 million / year.
lol lol.. i'd have lost it if that bike actually skid out of control










